Antonio Gramsci — Selections from the Prison Notebooks
1990 published claims from this book.
- A 1923 reform of Italian education was named for Gentile but drafted by Croce
- A backward nation can pass directly from bourgeois to socialist revolution.
- A class becomes hegemonic when its elite transcends narrow corporate interests
- A class born fully equipped with organic intellectuals can subordinate old classes without compromise
- A class can be practically advanced while its strata remain ideologically backward.
- A class lacking moral prestige can borrow the State’s reflected authority to found itself
- A clerical promotion makes manual labour shameful for a whole kinship clan
- A cohesive worldview fused with matching conduct functions as secular religion or ideology
- A common humanistic education can unify manual and intellectual capacities
- A conformism created from below enables, rather than destroys, individual freedom.
- A conquering official language never fully displaces vernacular mother-tongues.
- A consistent sceptic could not participate in debate at all
- A constructed ideal intellectual combines Third World origin with metropolitan location
- A critical warning can be inverted into a conservative political program
- A critical warning concept can be inverted into a ruling-class political program.
- A defeated coercive labour policy can reappear later under a new economic program.
- A democrat can still betray full comprehension of mass politics through strategic blindness
- A deterministic worldview can generate great practical initiative, as Calvinism did
- A disciplined centralized party is the prerequisite for Soviet experiments
- A dispersed rural class gains power by aligning its will with the ruling class
- A doctrine popularized for the masses becomes inadequate against elite ideologies
- A dominant group sustains rule by presenting its own interests as universal national ones
- A failed bourgeois revolution stems from economic weakness and historical timing
- A feudal insult against the bourgeoisie was reused by bourgeois culture against workers
- A finished work differs essentially from its raw preparatory material
- A finished work is constituted by editorial choice, not by its raw material
- A former left revolutionary turned monarchist pioneered colonial expansion and brutal suppression
- A full party develops into an integral state and world-conception
- A historical epoch’s philosophy is the ensemble of all its tendencies, not one system
- A landed stratum’s survival depends on keeping peasants impoverished
- A leading class must represent future needs beyond its present members
- A leading party can force a class beyond its own preferred position
- A leading party can force the situation forward by creating irreversible faits accomplis
- A living worldview must consciously respond to the present rather than past problems
- A long-lasting crisis signals incurable contradictions within a social structure.
- A mass base is necessary but insufficient for a party to exist
- A Mazzinian corporal attacked an Italian army barracks in 1870 shouting republican slogans
- A military class can permeate and partly occupy the state apparatus
- A movement gains autonomy only by learning that existing conditions are contingent, not natural.
- A movement’s social base determines the composition and slogans of its leadership.
- A nation’s religion, art, and philosophy are inseparable from its state form.
- A national-popular bloc requires religious and intellectual cohesion between elite and masses
- A national-popular elite can catalyze historical change by skipping developmental stages
- A new conformism built from below on production enables genuine freedom
- A new culture develops only with changing social relations and state formation.
- A new feminine self-conception is prerequisite to any healthy sexual regulation
- A new philosophy is defined by transforming how philosophy itself is conceived
- A new philosophy must root itself in popular consciousness like traditional beliefs.
- A new political faction crystallized only when an individual took deliberate initiative.
- A new science earns credibility by resolving or disproving its rivals’ core questions.
- A newly hegemonic subaltern group must build a new intellectual and moral order
- A paradigm theory prevents false comparisons across cultures and eras
- A party becomes historically necessary when conditions for its State power are already forming
- A party becomes indestructible when its mass base and leadership perpetuate themselves
- A party becomes undestroyable once its mass element necessarily generates leadership
- A party can function as a general ideology superintending scattered rival groups
- A party can function as ideological glue binding rival factions into one bloc
- A party can prefigure a state by meeting intellectuals’ needs through its services
- A party can wield hegemony by satisfying intellectuals’ needs like a state.
- A party is an embryonic state and can permit no division of power
- A party is complete only when it becomes historically redundant
- A party secures allied-group consent by arbitrating between its own and others’ interests
- A party severed from class roots becomes a rootless volunteer sect.
- A party structured as embryonic state cannot tolerate internal factions claiming equal rights
- A party without a governing program functions as the servant of its opponent
- A party’s history is inseparable from the whole society and state around it
- A party’s history is the general history of a country from one viewpoint.
- A party’s policing function is progressive or regressive depending on whose development it serves
- A passive revolution is elite-led change without mass participation
- A peasant class that self-produces its consumption cannot form collective political action
- A person’s real philosophy is expressed in action, not declared belief
- A person’s real worldview shows in action rather than declared belief
- A philosophy becomes historical and living only through contact with the simple
- A philosophy can exist implicitly inside practical aphorisms
- A philosophy is genuinely historical only by staying in contact with the simple masses
- A philosophy of praxis begins by criticizing common sense while building on it
- A philosophy of praxis methodology must be a systematic philology of history and politics
- A philosophy of praxis must critically supersede common sense while starting from it
- A philosophy’s historical worth is its practical effect on society
- A philosophy’s intellectual sources do not constitute its essential content
- A philosophy’s self-knowledge requires codifying its practical rules of research
- A policy of quality produces its opposite, disqualified quantity.
- A political element must prepare its own successors against its destruction
- A political leader can be a collective body with shifting individual spokesmen
- A political party can absorb intellectuals by replicating the state’s services
- A political party’s history is inseparable from its broader social group and national context.
- A political vanguard can begin on vague enthusiasm before finding a slogan
- A politics can be superficially Western yet not genuinely national.
- A progressive bourgeois law was repurposed to suppress workers’ associations
- A progressive national bloc requires allying with the peasant masses and lower intellectuals
- A prolonged crisis signals irremediable structural contradictions being patched over
- A purely theological movement had reactionary social effects in practice.
- A radical party must counterpose an organic program to dominant classes’ spontaneous attraction
- A rational, historicist will grounded in objective necessity grounds philosophy
- A receptive passive people can absorb and Russify foreign elites
- A regulated society cannot exist while any class-State remains
- A rentier class’s disappearance must precede industrial revolution
- A returning national elite can compel an enforced awakening in its people
- A revolutionary class needs a peasant base and agrarian program to win
- A revolutionary crisis needs a vanguard party already formed to exploit it
- A revolutionary government endures only if it unites a majority coalition.
- A revolutionary theory is defined by conscious separation into two camps
- A rigid material-instrument theory spawns absurd boundary questions
- A rising class can dominate economically while old elites retain politico-intellectual supremacy.
- A ruler’s broken amnesty destroyed the last consensual basis for Bourbon legitimacy
- A ruling class lacking organic intellectuals cannot sustain hegemony
- A ruling class needs its own intellectuals to exercise hegemony alongside coercion
- A sabotaged general strike demoralized the proletariat and opened the way for fascism
- A saturated bourgeois class reverts to the State as pure force
- A school of Italian criminology argued the biological inferiority of Southern Italians.
- A school’s social character comes from perpetuating a group’s class function
- A school’s social character comes from which class it serves, not its teaching method
- A self-described liberal could celebrate the Russian Revolution as liberation while rejecting its socialism
- A self-made national elite can awaken a passive people by skipping historical stages
- A shared enemy alone cannot constitute national unity
- A single regional autonomy movement split along the fascism divide in interwar Italy
- A single subaltern group can exercise hegemony over others via a party
- A single youthful political error can haunt a career for decades
- A sixteenth-century monk authored a utopia mixing theocracy and communism
- A small Italian ruling group absorbed all political personnel from subversive mass movements
- A small-circulation journal organized factory councils across Turin’s major factories.
- A social order persists until new productive relations mature within it
- A southern newspaper shaped regional ideology toward expansionist settler colonialism.
- A southern reaction quantified the wealth extracted from Sardinia by the unitary state.
- A state can defuse revolt by denying radicals the repression that mobilizes masses.
- A state can defuse revolution by restraining provocation and waiting out empty rhetoric.
- A state can politically rest on plutocracy and ordinary savers at once.
- A state can substitute for a leading class in a passive revolution
- A state’s consent is organised and educated through associations, not merely election moments
- A structural phase can only be analyzed after it has fully developed
- A sub-proletariat can become the conservative bastion of a monarch against bourgeois revolution
- A subaltern group’s disorganic growth blocks its access to state power and hegemony
- A subordinate class cannot win by imitating ruling-class force tactics
- A teenager’s alleged assassination attempt became the pretext for abolishing Italian democracy.
- A tenth of Italy’s population lived off the state budget
- A theory is revolutionary by being openly antagonistic to all old thought
- A theory’s influence penetrates rivals diffusely through implicit absorption, not direct adoption.
- A theory’s universality is proven by its incorporation into new concrete realities.
- A theory’s universality is shown by its capacity to illuminate new concrete situations.
- A thinker must be studied in works published under their own responsibility
- A thinker’s authentic works supersede co-authored attributions
- A thinker’s most fecund ideas often appear outside their expected domain
- A thinker’s own thought must be separated from earlier material that only stimulated it
- A thinker’s provisional borrowings are discards, not part of their true worldview
- A traditional civilization subordinates all spheres to intellectual principles
- A victor state’s war exhaustion can cost it hegemony at peace
- A weak bourgeoisie explains why no revolutionary vanguard party formed in Italy
- A weak bourgeoisie’s failure to ally with peasants prevents hegemonic revolution
- A weakly-developed bourgeoisie shapes a country’s political-military structure.
- A worldview’s hold on the masses requires continuous organized repetition and intellectual leadership
- A worldview’s independence or integration is a decisive analytic criterion.
- Abolishing a political form requires abolishing its economic content
- Abolishing parliamentary forms requires abolishing their individualist economic content
- Absence of feudal legacy sedimentations drove American capital accumulation more than natural wealth
- Absence of historical sedimentations, not natural wealth, drove American capital accumulation.
- Absolute rules guarantee collective trust where case-by-case judgment cannot
- Absolute rules of duty justify trust in those holding power over others
- Absorbing enemy elites decapitates opposition; hegemony precedes state power
- Abstraction, modern thought’s key power, operates by effacing the human face
- Abstractions are required to produce real social objects
- Accepting a comintern-imposed leadership requires an internal polemicist fraction
- Accurate social analysis benefits even those who publicly oppose its author.
- Accusations of foreign rationalism may mask genuine national adherence
- Administrative standing substitutes for political legitimacy
- Adolescent daydreaming is a narcissistic compensation for felt inadequacy
- Advanced capitalism’s superstructures slow revolutionary action and demand long-term strategy
- Adversaries can understand subaltern political technique better than subalterns
- Agitational parties without government programmes serve their rivals.
- Agrarian interests outweighed regional autonomy in consolidating national unity.
- All essential questions of sociology collapse into questions of political science
- All humans are philosophers; experts differ only in quantitative rigor.
- All humans exercise intellectual activity, but only some become intellectuals.
- All party members are intellectuals by their directive-organisational function.
- All people are legislators in a broad political sense
- All people are philosophers, differing from professionals only in degree
- All property relations involve state intervention continuously
- All state powers are organs of hegemony in varying degrees
- Alliance-building is easier where no single majority presides.
- America skipped feudalism, making its productive methods of global theoretical interest
- America’s absence of feudal tradition produced a universal work ethic across classes
- American hegemony arises in the factory, fusing force and persuasion without state intermediaries
- American influence on Europe works through economic production, not culture
- American ruling classes are now generating the same social passivity Europe had
- Americanism is a panic reaction of doomed old strata, not a real culture
- Americanism is an intensification of European civilisation, not a new type
- Americanism is not a new civilisation but an intensified extension of European capitalism
- An absolute duty rule is the only guarantee of responsible collective leadership.
- An anti-establishment artistic movement can be absorbed into authoritarian nationalism
- An author’s absorbed influences differ from their own original philosophy
- An editor’s footnote reveals Gramsci cited a tale from memory rather than text
- An educated class that cannot lead the masses fails its historical function
- An effective revolutionary strategy required a worker-peasant alliance spanning North and South Italy.
- An epoch’s philosophy is a combination, not any single thinker’s system
- An era’s philosophy is a synthesis of popular and elite worldviews
- An explicitly non-socialist liberal could nonetheless celebrate Lenin and Trotsky as liberators
- An ideology in its highest sense is a world-conception permeating all social life
- An international class must nationalise itself to lead nationally-rooted social strata
- An intransigent faction functions as party conscience rather than genuine alternative leadership.
- An obscure thinker could wield outsized intellectual influence despite publishing almost nothing
- An occupying power can provoke premature revolt to identify and decapitate resistance
- An organization’s value includes preparing successors for its own defeat
- An unresolved party-versus-union divide left the Italian radical movement internally dual
- An urban republic fell because it neglected the countryside and threatened its income sources
- Analysis of force relations only matters as justification for practical will
- Analyzing mass movements properly begins with followers, function and demands, not suspicion of manipulation
- Analyzing mass movements requires examining social content before judging motives
- Anarchist claims to be educators are inverted by ironical false etymology.
- Anti-colonial struggle blends three distinct forms of political warfare
- Anti-colonial struggle deploys war of position, movement, and underground forms
- Anti-democratic legislators were within one shift of becoming a majority
- Antivar slogans differ in whether they presuppose a mythical national ‘we’
- Any epoch’s philosophy is an ensemble including common sense, not a single system
- Any proposed social solution operates inside modernity’s inherent contradictions
- Any single religion contains multiple contradictory class-specific versions
- Apparent cruelty can restore political order and loyalty
- Apparent spontaneity is merely un-documented conscious leadership in subaltern movements
- Appealing to commonsense realism to refute philosophy implicitly restores religious belief.
- Appeals to product quality conceal class-based market strategies
- Appeals to quality over quantity mask class privilege
- Appearances are historically necessary, not merely illusory
- Applying advanced foreign schemas to a less developed society yields confusion, not progress
- Arising Black American intellectuals could channel expansionist influence into Africa.
- Ascendant groups develop from subaltern to hegemonic status through acquiring autonomy and allies
- Associational life differs structurally between America and Europe
- Assumed collective wills require reconcentration rather than creation from scratch.
- Attacks on vulgar economism are often mistaken for critiques of Marxism itself
- Attempts to purify language of metaphor are doomed and futile
- Austro-Marxists read Marx as objective science and sought values in Kantian ethics
- Authoritarian leadership fails to win the consent of those it commands
- Authoritarian rule that rejects winning consent fails militarily and politically
- Autonomous factory committees threatened established trade-union structures from inception.
- Behaviorist accounts of persons fail by omitting their transcendence-transcended principle
- Being an intellectual is defined by directive and educative function, not education level.
- Being present at a creative political moment sharpens one’s grasp of political will.
- Belief that existing arrangements are natural blocks real social change.
- Bergson’s elan vital defines life as a creative, non-predetermined action on matter
- Bergson’s vitalism rejects both mechanistic and finalist accounts of evolution
- Betrayals by reformist union leaders did not deliver communists a union majority
- Biological race and craniology do not constitute historical unity among humans.
- Biology and abstract reason never united humans; concrete thought did
- Bismarck and Disraeli launched social welfare legislation to counter socialist pressures
- Black parliamentarism operates like informal markets, explained through hegemony
- Bodin theorized consent and class balance, not state founding like Machiavelli
- Bodin’s politics concerned consent and class balance, not founding a national state
- Bolshevisation was contested inside the PCI along left-centre factional lines
- Bordiga and Gramsci split over international versus national frames for revolutionary action.
- Bordiga asserted national sections could question Russian Communist Party policy
- Bordiga attacked Ordine Nuovo as syndicalist gradualism neglecting state power
- Bordiga rejected winning working-class majorities for a pure vanguard party
- Bordiga saw Comintern strategy as favoring the party’s Right.
- Bordiga’s followers treated party discipline as inapplicable to predestined leaders
- Bored isolated labor can breed nonconformist thought in workers
- Both PSI and PCI condemned anti-fascist Arditi for differing reasons.
- Both the PCI and Aventine opposition misjudged fascism’s imminent crackdown
- Boulanger’s near-successful coup attempt failed through hesitation, not weakness
- Bourgeois ideology claims society can be wholly assimilated
- Bourgeois Italian intellectuals fail to apply their talent due to national conditions
- Bourgeois law and state aim to absorb the whole of society into itself
- Bourgeois libertinism spread downward undermines working-class moral discipline
- Bourgeois parliamentary expansion co-existed with periodic repression and suffrage curbs
- Bourgeois rule absorbs and assimilates society, unlike closed-caste prior ruling classes
- Bourgeois rule transforms the State into an educator assimilating all classes
- Bourgeoisie could grow within feudal states, but socialism cannot grow within capitalism
- Bourgeoisie rule can hide behind the facade of old aristocratic classes
- Breaking the unity of traditional ideology precedes new forces acquiring independent self-consciousness.
- Broad popular penetration made Protestant nations militarily and culturally resilient
- Brutal state repression of a peasant revolt fueled regional nationalism
- Bukharin’s 1921 manual was the canonical text of vulgar-materialist Marxist orthodoxy.
- Bukharin’s philosophical defeat coincided with his political destruction
- Bureaucratic centralism arises from political passivity at the periphery, not just top-down control.
- Bureaucratic centralism signals a ruling group becoming a self-perpetuating clique.
- Bureaucratic centralism signals a ruling group hardening into a narrow clique
- Bureaucratic expansion creates masses of intellectuals justified by politics rather than production
- Bureaucratic independence from democratic control is a universal problem requiring varied solutions
- Bureaucratic party rule can develop into a dictatorship masking capitalist development
- Byzantinism treats theoretical questions as self-valuable apart from practice.
- Caesar’s and Napoleon I’s Caesarism was transformative; Napoleon III’s was merely quantitative
- Caesar’s citizenship grants created Rome’s permanent imperial intellectual class.
- Caesarism arises when conflicting forces reach catastrophic equilibrium, letting a third force intervene
- Caesarism can serve either progressive or reactionary forces depending on concrete history
- Caesarism cannot be explained by fundamental-class equilibrium alone
- Caesarism describes compromise regimes without equating fascism with capitalism
- Caesarism emerges when balanced hostile forces risk mutual destruction
- Caesarism emerges when two forces reach an organic equilibrium neither can win
- Caesarism is a compromise between fundamental forces, not pure Bonapartism
- Caesarism is a polemical formula that can operate through parliaments without any heroic person
- Caesarism is neither inherently progressive nor reactionary; only concrete history decides
- Caesarism names rule arising when conflicting forces mutually exhaust each other
- Caesarist military regimes differ by whether the countryside is passive or uncoordinated
- Caesarist power can mark either a genuine state-type revolution or mere evolution
- Caesarist solutions can operate through parliament without any heroic personality
- Calling the whole past monstrous cannot inspire present action
- Calvinism’s doctrine of vocation energetically promoted economic life and wealth
- Calvinist determinism paradoxically generated extreme practical initiative and collective will.
- Campanella’s Utopia fused theocratic rule with communist social organization
- Capitalist modernization proceeds by passive revolution when revolutionary forces are defeated
- Capitalist rationalization attempts to co-opt worker militancy through co-operative management schemes
- Capitalist reform gestures aim to absorb workers’ self-organization into management goals
- Cataloguing behaviors is insufficient; deciphering them requires a proper method
- Catastrophic stalemate can result from momentary dominance failure rather than organic crisis
- Catholic ecclesiastical organisation absorbed and monopolised cultural direction for centuries
- Catholic lay movements were suppressed and later reborn as mass political parties.
- Catholic Modernism reconciled Church doctrine with modern science.
- Catholic Modernism, condemned in 1907, seeded later Christian Democracy
- Catholic Popular Party outcompeted socialist unions among Italian peasants.
- Censorship forced Gramsci’s political commentary into opaque, allusive form in prison
- Central parties suppress intra-party disputes from reaching international sections
- Centralizing budget authority neutralized regional rivals by making them compete for funds
- Challenging a monopoly on pedagogy is a route to building hegemony.
- Charisma stems from Weberian authority lacking legitimate institutional basis
- Children’s consciousness reflects their social milieu, always at odds with school curricula
- Civil society exerts coercive educative pressure without formal legal sanctions
- Civil society in advanced states resists direct economic shocks.
- Civil society itself exercises hegemony and thus is the State proper
- Civil society stands between economic structure and the coercive State.
- Civil society’s claimed independence from the state renders its critique dismissable
- Claims to supersede Marxism often regress to pre-Marxian humanism dressed in new vocabulary.
- Class ascendancy cannot quietly mature within the regime it aims to replace
- Class consciousness requires maintained antagonistic cleavage, not reconciliation with rulers.
- Class consciousness shapes the gestalt of thought, not its details
- Class differentiation into castes dissolves the moral authority needed for coercion
- Class struggle can continue invisibly beneath a regime’s surface stability.
- Classical education forged modern European selfhood by assimilating Greco-Roman civilisation.
- Classical education formed character by assimilating the European cultural past.
- Co-opting local elites into state offices neutralizes potential regional opposition leadership.
- Coalition governments are potential first stages of Caesarism, not bulwarks against it
- Coercive State power can progressively wither into regulated civil society
- Collaborators’ joint authorship does not guarantee doctrinal identity
- Collective association multiplies individual power to achieve radical change
- Collective critique and division of labor raise a group’s average to its best members.
- Collective disasters stem from leaders neglecting others’ sacrifices, not from followers’ disobedience
- Collective historical action requires a shared cultural conception welding dispersed wills into one aim
- Collective movements are best studied through their minute molecular phases
- Collective wills are born from countless molecular discursive exchanges
- Collective wills crystallize from countless micro-discursive acts
- Collective worker consciousness extends from the factory to national and international division of labour
- Colonial mythmaking survived opposition from its own financiers
- Combating economism requires developing the concept of hegemony
- Comintern factional balance gave national parties policy autonomy before 1926
- Comintern factions defined fascism as armed dictatorship of capitalist fractions
- Comintern interventions could trigger right-wing internal opposition in national parties.
- Comintern left factions resisted united-front strategies toward socialists.
- Comintern policy after 1924 was determined by Russian party struggles
- Comintern practice collapsed left and right opposition into one category
- Comintern structure inverted authority by balancing on the Russian summit
- Common people hold beliefs by faith in their group, not by reasoned argument
- Common schooling aims to produce autonomous, creatively capable citizens.
- Common schooling requires converting education from private to public cost.
- Common schooling would unify intellectual and industrial work across social life
- Common sense died once science explained how it worked
- Common sense earned praise historically as anti-authoritarian empiricism but now has less intrinsic merit
- Common sense is a chaotic aggregate allowing any claim to be confirmed
- Common sense is an incoherent aggregate containing any and all conceptions
- Common sense is an uncritically absorbed, fragmentary folklore of philosophy, not a coherent system.
- Common sense is class-bound folklore that sedimented philosophies leave behind
- Common sense is conservative so new truths entering it prove exceptional force
- Common sense is contradictory and only validates truths by their historical spread
- Common sense is fluid, replenished by specialist ideas that sink into popular knowledge.
- Common sense is historical and plural, with religion as only one fragment of it
- Common sense is society’s incoherent assumptions while good sense is practical empirical judgment
- Common sense is the fragmentary, incoherent philosophy of non-philosophers tied to their social class
- Common sense is the uncritical, unconscious worldview common to an epoch
- Common sense layers sedimented historical beliefs with crude realistic elements, remaining acritical
- Common sense merits only a limited empirical trust, not philosophical authority.
- Common sense once carried real experimental merit but now has far less.
- Common sense preserves layered residues of past religions and cults
- Common sense varies across time, place, and even within one person
- Commonsense objections hinder the popular spread of idealist philosophy
- Communist parties after October 1917 organized strategy around revolution’s actuality
- Communist revolution was understood to require winning a majority of workers first.
- Communists feared accepting reformist leadership would liquidate revolutionary perspective.
- Communists in the early twenties still saw revolution as imminent
- Complete political equality requires prior economic equality
- Compromise is the only concrete method for unifying allied forces
- Concepts only carry meaning within the theory that frames them
- Condemned social groups cannot rebuild; those bearing the new order’s burden must.
- Confalonieri conspired against Austria and had his death sentence commuted to exile
- Confident assertions in letters are less reliable than considered book claims
- Conflicts are first consciously grasped only at the level of ideology.
- Conjuncture is ephemeral circumstances while situation is structural
- Conjuncture means immediate ephemeral conditions while situation means longer strategic structure.
- Conquest of power and new productive arrangements are inseparable
- Conservative elites may champion reforms deliberately to forestall revolution.
- Conservative statesmen granted welfare concessions to defuse working-class unrest
- Conservative wills aimed at preserving equilibria are equally acts of political will
- Constitutional fictions of the crown protect State unity and consent.
- Continental European states formed from reaction-national transcendence of the French Revolution.
- Coopting a rival faction leader into leadership prevented a cross-faction alliance
- Corporate-statist ideology lets the State claim popular backing while remaining plutocratic.
- Corporatism conceived as an autonomous industrial bloc excludes parasitic savers from accumulation.
- Corporatism predates Fascism and was co-opted by Mussolini
- Corporatist ideology preceded fascism and drew supporters across the political spectrum.
- Corporatist state structures preserve rather than transform existing class order
- Corporatist States present a popular base while remaining structurally plutocratic
- Corruption substitutes for hegemony when force and consent both fail
- Counter-hegemonic elites require an internal hierarchy to develop
- Countryside regions with strongest patriarchalism show 30 percent family incest rates
- Creating new intellectual strata from unprepared groups faces unprecedented difficulty
- Creative school means autonomous rediscovery, not originality at all costs
- Creative schooling means mastering a method, not producing novelties
- Creative thought is thought that modifies popular feeling and thereby reality.
- Crises must be analyzed through the organic-conjunctural distinction rather than either economism or ideologism.
- Crises of ruling legitimacy produce misread progress claims and mass empowerment
- Crispi’s career anticipated twentieth-century Italian nationalism and fascism
- Critical thinking means incorporating rather than defeating adversary positions
- Critique must target foundational syntheses, not mass ideology
- Critique reweights old ideology’s elements, promoting the subordinate to nucleus
- Croce denied politics philosophical value while Gramsci made it central
- Croce’s enthusiasm for De Man rested on shared anti-Marxism, not theoretical affinity.
- Croce’s philosophy tried to reabsorb Marxism as a subordinate of traditional culture.
- Croce’s post-Marxist secularism influenced Italian left intellectuals
- Cross-national organizations function as international intellectuals mediating between extremes
- Crude economism explains every political movement by a guaranteed ruling-class profit
- Cultural and economistic deviations are twin symptoms of the same immaturity
- Cultural brilliance can coincide with and mask political and military decadence
- Cultural formations are momentary equilibria of old and new social relations
- Cultural labels like ‘Americanism’ are reaction from socially displaced strata, not new order.
- Cultural leadership requires self-limited freedom of intellectual inquiry, not police coercion
- Cultural outcomes stem from whole tradition, not the specific subject taught
- Cultural tradition outside school, not the subject itself, does the educating
- Cultural unity among an elite cannot substitute for political unity of the masses.
- Daily material practices express the totality of a group’s social relations.
- Daydreaming inverts the present into fantasy rather than transforming it.
- Daydreaming substitutes fantasy for the disciplined transformation of present reality
- Deep intellectual study initially captivates the whole personality before critical equilibrium forms
- Defeated revolutionary movements often self-destruct rather than self-correct
- Defensive efforts to resolve crisis constitute the conjunctural terrain where opposition organizes.
- Defining fascism posed contested questions of national specificity versus general capitalist tendency.
- Defining man as an ensemble of social relations blocks comparison across eras
- Degrading the people into an object is the deepest demagogy.
- Democracy exists where led groups can pass into the leading group
- Democracy requires that every citizen can govern, not merely reach a better job
- Democratic centralism has nothing to do with abstract democracy.
- Democratic centralism is not abstract democracy but a distinct historical form.
- Democratic centralism means adapting constantly to movement rather than hardening into bureaucracy
- Democratic centralism requires inductive adaptation rather than abstract rule-following.
- Democratic centralism seeks unity inductively through practice, not by abstract deduction
- Democratic policy was understood as necessary for conscript national armies
- Denigrating past doctrines creates a verbal illusion of superiority
- Denying the predictability of social facts logically yields pure opportunism
- Despite mass membership, Italy’s socialist party failed to organize revolution
- Devolution of state functions to local bodies presupposes a rentier class of civic prestige.
- Dialectical thinking contradicts vulgar common sense’s demand for certainties.
- Didactic abstractions are necessary and do not mislead learners
- Diet, clothing, housing and family express social relations as a whole.
- Different local conditions produced rival revolutionary strategies in early Italian communism
- Differentiated schooling reproduces rather than abolishes class divisions
- Diplomacy’s conserving habits stem from a single state’s limited weight
- Disinterested formative schooling is being eliminated in favor of early vocational specialization
- Dismissing past thought as irrational reduces to smug presentism
- Displaced rural petit-bourgeois intellectuals become ready volunteers for subversive movements.
- Diverting popular anger onto secondary targets protects ruling-class power
- Divided labor’s objective subordination becomes historically dissolvable once the subaltern class grasps it
- Doctrinal movements can serve as vehicles for social and political reaction.
- Doctrinal orthodoxy is judged by a theory’s self-sufficiency, not by any single adherent’s reading.
- Dogmatic cataloguing of sources replaced real historical interpretation
- Domestic and foreign policy are organically linked, not separable
- Dominant classes survive crises by out-maneuvering subordinate groups
- Dominant groups conquer traditional intellectuals by developing organic ones.
- Dominating differs from leading in whether rulers concord interests with others.
- Domination without leadership constitutes dictatorship without hegemony
- Dual power in the factories ended through isolation, not armed force
- Each field of research must develop its own method rather than borrow natural-science method
- Each firm’s unique productive process breeds a privileged skilled workforce.
- Each rising class generates its own organic intellectuals from its practical activity
- Each science constructs its own method; there is no universal method
- Each social group’s optimal internal structure varies with its members’ culture and discipline.
- Each social system has its own demographic equilibrium whose breakdown can be catastrophic.
- Early American union struggles defended craft rights against industrial liberty.
- Early communist analysts divided on whether fascism was novel or a bourgeois unity
- Early fascism grew into a mass phenomenon through massive state connivance
- Early Italian nationalists failed because aristocrats withheld support
- Early Italian socialism fragmented between reformism and revolutionary left currents.
- Early Italian sociology grounded Southern inferiority claims in biology and race
- Early nineteenth-century carbonarist revolutions failed across Europe except in Greece
- Early schooling should replace folkloristic worldviews with concepts of the State.
- Early vocational specialization can re-crystallize class divisions rather than dissolve them.
- Economic abstractions are historically determined, not universal or extra-historical
- Economic and political problems are never only about economics or politics
- Economic base determines superstructure and historical epochs change through structural contradiction
- Economic class analysis of the state cannot be applied mechanically to history
- Economic coercion alone cannot force workers to adapt to new production methods
- Economic crises alone cannot topple advanced capitalist states because civil society resists
- Economic crises alone do not directly cause fundamental historical events
- Economic crises cannot by themselves overthrow advanced capitalist states.
- Economic crises supposedly serve as artillery breaching enemy defences and rallying revolutionary troops
- Economic extremism and cultural opportunism are twin aspects of the same political immaturity.
- Economic laws of tendency operate historicistly, not as naturalistic determinisms.
- Economic restructuring does not make superstructural self-development automatic
- Economic structure can only be analyzed after it develops fully
- Economic struggle becomes political when class fights for its very organization.
- Economic subordination shaped a distinct Southern Italian socialist tradition.
- Economics, philosophy, and politics must be mutually translatable within one worldview
- Economism’s crude form retains a ferment capable of higher rebirth
- Economism’s premature judgment reduces political analysis to moralistic accusations
- Economism’s profit-hunting method is a fallacious historiographical shortcut
- Economism’s self-serving reasoning always locates profit in a progressive ruling fraction
- Education aims to form autonomous citizens, not just skilled workers
- Education distinguishes natural laws from alterable social laws via work
- Education is a formative struggle against biological instincts, not passive unwinding.
- Education is a struggle against nature that forms each new generation
- Education policy slogans can mask reactionary practice behind rhetorical progressivism
- Education shifts from imposed discipline to demanded self-discipline
- Educational reform fails when it changes curricula rather than the social complex producing teachers
- Effective politics can operate tacitly outside formal institutions like black markets
- Effective reality is a shifting equilibrium of forces, not a static ground
- Effective revolutionary parties unite force with consent dialectically
- Effective social groups are constrained to an optimal intermediate size.
- Efforts to reverse technocratic expertise tend to fail as mere moralism
- Eighteenth-century French materialism grounded equality in biological species-unity
- Elections measure the persuasive reach of elites, not equal individual opinions
- Elementary foundational ideas grow into political pillars through innumerable repetition
- Elite complaints against democracy mask a wish to seize popular decision power
- Elite cultural movements fail to penetrate society unless they win collective popular faith
- Elite cultural unity does not equal mass political unity
- Elite intellectuals must be created through a slow contradictory process
- Elite intellectuals must subordinate individual flexibility to the collective doctrine’s demands
- Elite libertinism creates totalitarian hypocrisy when coercion disappears
- Elite tactical units signal the masses’ passivity, not their combativeness.
- Elite volunteer action substitutes for mass popular participation in national history
- Elite volunteer action substitutes for, rather than expresses, popular mass participation
- Elite-led and popular revolutionary forces jointly make outcomes even when unaware
- Emerging orders ground themselves in production, not in inherited moral authority.
- Empires suppressed nationalist uprisings by enlisting subordinate ethnic groups with land promises
- Empirical positivism and speculative idealism are mirror forms of anti-historicism.
- Engelsian freedom means transcending necessity, not political liberty
- England’s nobility absorbed bourgeois functions to preserve the ruling system
- English and American divorce law far surpassed Italy’s in Gramsci’s era
- Equating individual, society, and State by pure logic produces a fascist utopia.
- Essential factual drill is indispensable at some educational stages
- Established organic forces consistently absorb spontaneous mass movements
- Estranged bureaucracy becomes a party replacing political leadership
- Ethical and interventionist state concepts have distinct philosophical and economic origins
- European culture is uniquely universal because it assimilates other cultures
- European fascism drew its intellectual lineage from syndicalist and ex-servicemen milieus.
- Even America now generates its own social passivity and new residues
- Even mechanical teaching can produce informed, self-ordering pupils
- Even the judiciary is an organ of political hegemony, not neutral arbiter.
- Every form of property depends on State intervention throughout economic life
- Every hegemonic relationship is necessarily an educational relationship
- Every hegemony relationship is an educational relationship pervading all of society
- Every human collectivity has its own specific optimum principle of fixed proportions.
- Every nation believes it invented the comforts of civilized life first.
- Every nation’s internal power relations are unique and must be studied as such
- Every person sustains or modifies a conception of the world.
- Every philosophy has confronted the problem of uniting theory and practice.
- Every philosophy is a politics embedded in its historical context
- Every philosophy tends to become the common sense of a limited intellectual environment
- Every political action serves some faction, even if not one’s own
- Every politics is implicitly a philosophy even when crudely sketched
- Every prior philosophy expressed social contradictions without consciously knowing them
- Every privilege presupposes someone else being sacrificed and exploited.
- Every social group forms its own specialized intellectual categories.
- Every social stratum carries its own common sense, sedimented from past philosophies.
- Every social system has its own law of fixed demographic proportions.
- Every society develops its own solution to the problem of bureaucratic control.
- Every society must solve the problem of bureaucratic independence
- Every sociology presupposes a philosophy of which it is a subordinate part
- Every spontaneous movement contains rudimentary elements of conscious leadership and discipline
- Every state contains territorial sectors whose local relations of force differ internally
- Every state requires both coercive arms and legitimating belief.
- Every worldview claiming eternal truth is actually historically provisional.
- Everyday language silently preserves superseded worldviews as fossilized metaphors.
- Everyone acts as a legislator by modifying their social environment
- Everyone is a philosopher; experts differ only in degree, not kind
- Everyone is an intellectual, but few hold the social function.
- Everyone possesses intellectual activity; intellectuals are a trained social stratum, not a separate species
- Exact sciences held near-fetishistic authority within Marxist thought
- Experimental science achieved the greatest cultural unification of human subjectivity
- Experimental science is the most universalized form of subjectivity
- Expertise-based bureaucracies enable capitalist control over democratic regimes
- External sacred authority legitimises hereditary dynasties after oligarchic rule.
- Extolling spontaneity as a method masks a bid to replace existing leadership
- Factional allegiance to the Comintern line determined Italian party leadership calculations
- Factional strength shifts through organizational, not ideological, factors
- Facts are only selected for enquiry against a pre-existing conceptual criterion
- Facts only become meaningful through pre-existing conceptual criteria of choice
- Failed assassination attempts trigger disproportionate factional political violence
- Failed insurrections reveal class divisions within national liberation movements
- Failed revolutionary agency lets the old order exterminate its rival elite
- Failed revolutions invalidate tactical estimates but not underlying historical analysis
- Failed transitions of power end in class extermination or mutual ruin.
- Failing to ally with radicalized petty bourgeois drives them toward the ruling class
- Failing to name internal allies of an external enemy depoliticizes struggle into petty disputes
- Family and city life confer hidden educational advantages on privileged children.
- Family environment transmits the bodily attitudes that make study succeed
- Fantasy thinking substitutes passive imagined futures for real present transformation
- Fascism absorbed the bourgeoisie, Vatican, and industrial capital by 1924
- Fascism appropriated the Hegelian idea of a national spirit to justify state power
- Fascism arrested class polarisation before the bourgeoisie formed its own party
- Fascism captured and transformed corporatism beyond its originators’ intentions.
- Fascism defines itself explicitly against democracy as rule by sheer numbers
- Fascism drew on syndicalist currents and positioned itself against both bolshevism and plutocracy.
- Fascism followed the defeat of workers, not ruling-class desperation
- Fascism is a petit-bourgeois mass movement bankrolled by big capital, not mere elite politics
- Fascism originated in the petite and rural bourgeoisie then served capitalist class interests
- Fascism represented big capital directly seizing the state apparatus.
- Fascism restored class consciousness and organization to the bourgeoisie
- Fascism shattered a school of historians whose members dispersed into exile or regime service
- Fascism unified the bourgeoisie and gave it renewed class consciousness.
- Fascism was an aggressive offensive, not a desperate defensive move
- Fascism’s 1926 consolidation rested on a repression more thorough than earlier reaction.
- Fascism’s electoral strength rested on absorbing bourgeois strata and Vatican support
- Fascism’s essence was disputed among revolutionaries in 1926
- Fascism’s internal contradictions failed to destabilize the regime.
- Fascism’s rise combined petit-bourgeois base with big-bourgeois patronage
- Fascist arrests hollowed out the PCI leadership, forcing exile-based recomposition
- Fascist corporations displaced autonomous trade unions by state-granted sole bargaining rights
- Fascist Italy replaced independent trade unions with state labour corporations.
- Fascist movements grew from ex-servicemen plotting putsches into minor electoral parties.
- Fascist movements recruited disaffected military officers radicalized by the Russian Civil War
- Fascist prison conditions nearly killed Gramsci before transfer to Formia
- Fascist repression crushed Italian communist party organisation in early 1923
- Fascist repression itself severed the Italian Communist Party’s original leadership
- Fascist repression pushed communist recruitment toward the peasantry.
- Fascist school reform aimed to synthesize Italian high culture around the national ideal
- Fascist show trials render legal evidence secondary to political verdicts.
- Fascist suppression of dissident publishing came through administrative bans and harassment
- Fatalism is active will disguised while in a weak position
- Fatalism is real will dressed in the clothing of weakness
- Fatalistic determinism and crude voluntarism can coexist in one politics
- Fatalistic determinism arose as ideology suited to subaltern social strata.
- Fear of revolutionary terror and personal ties to elites demobilized the Action Party
- Feelings in politics can themselves be expressions of economic interests, not their opposite.
- Feudal clerics were intellectuals organically bound to the landed aristocracy
- Feudal elites can keep leading a bourgeois state without fusing with the bourgeoisie
- Feudalism’s crisis begins when the aristocracy loses its military-technical monopoly
- Feuerbach’s materialism retained a dualism between objective reality and human subjectivity
- Finance capital rule can rest on a petit-bourgeois democratic base
- Finance-capital rule can rest politically on petit-bourgeois and peasant rentiers
- For Gramsci the leap-vs-evolution debate marks where theory becomes political action.
- For the PCI Left, fascist repression merely confirmed the inevitability of revolution
- Force and consent operate dialectically, not in mechanical sequence.
- Force cannot assimilate one’s own side, only compromise can
- Ford’s direct control of distribution cut costs and enabled high wages.
- Ford’s high wages derive from a new, more exhausting form of labor-power consumption.
- Ford’s high wages were paid because its methods exhausted labor power more intensely
- Ford’s wages fail to compensate for the exhaustion of its labour force.
- Fordism marks a forced passage from economic individualism to a planned economy
- Fordist hegemony rests on force plus persuasion, born in the factory.
- Fordist labour discipline requires persuasion and high wages, not coercion alone.
- Fordist rationalisation creates a new human type through psycho-physical adaptation before hegemony.
- Foreign observers endorsed fascism through its claimed practical achievements
- Foreign troops curbing local revolution alienated the rural masses and doomed the Republic
- Formal logic is acquired through study, not innate as curricula assume
- Formal logic is acquired through work, not innate
- Foscolo read Machiavelli as exposing tyranny while strengthening rulers
- Fovel theorized the corporation as a self-contained productive bloc against parasitic savers
- Fragmentary authorship requires caution against treating unfinished drafts as definitive
- Fragmented rural property spawns a disruptive stratum of appointment-seekers
- France’s 1789 revolution came amid economic plenty, not impoverishment
- France’s bourgeoisie arrived in 1789 already equipped to dominate culturally
- Freedom of research must be preserved from subordination to cultural policy
- Freedom of thought depends materially on prior mastery of natural necessity
- French fascism drew on syndicalist and anti-bolshevik movements rooted in ex-servicemen
- French Jacobinism presupposed Physiocrat culture’s economic defense of peasant proprietors
- French political culture long stressed binding Paris to the countryside.
- Full legislative power couples formulated directives with execution, verification, and mass consent
- Garibaldi’s forces suppressed Sicilian peasant revolts on behalf of order
- Generic nationalist slogans can mask a bloc’s concrete class interests
- Generic slogans like unity can mask diverging political content under one hegemony
- Gentile’s 1923 school reform tried to synthesize Italian high culture under the national ideal.
- Gentile’s pure act philosophy exalts action divorced from self-reflection.
- Genuine historical thinking holds truths as period-bound without collapsing into relativism.
- Genuine political knowledge requires sentimental connection between intellectuals and the people
- Geographical categories remain real even when they are conventional historical constructs.
- German cultural predominance was abstract prestige, not structural influence
- German idealism first introduced the creativity of thought into philosophy
- German industrialization left feudal classes ruling while the bourgeoisie held economic power
- Germany’s 1848 revolution failed from weak bourgeois concentration and the national question
- Giants, he suggests ironically, are what get filmed.
- Giolitti allied with the Catholic Electoral Union in 1913 to block socialist gains
- Giolitti replaced Crispi’s Jacobin fervor with bureaucratic continuity in policy
- Giordano Bruno distinguished contemplation from heroic striving in knowing
- Gramsci analyzed fascism as comparable to Bonapartism and New Deal interventionism
- Gramsci analyzed fascism through its social base rather than abstract class form
- Gramsci anchored revolution in autonomous class organisations dialectically linked to a vanguard party.
- Gramsci applies passive revolution to the fascist regime itself
- Gramsci asks whether parliament is part of the state structure itself
- Gramsci asks whether passive revolution characterizes the present as much as the past
- Gramsci asks whether phenomena are objective or cut out by practical and scientific interests.
- Gramsci attacked empiricism and positivism masked as materialism in Bukharin’s Manual
- Gramsci backed Bordiga partly from fear of a rightward replacement
- Gramsci believed bourgeois state forces would migrate to the democratic opposition
- Gramsci borrowed non-Marxist concepts while redefining them within Marxist discourse
- Gramsci broke from Bordiga’s immobilism while keeping his own critique of Comintern
- Gramsci came to see fascism as unifier of the ruling class, not just terror
- Gramsci censored terms like Marx and class to evade prison censors
- Gramsci coined ‘catharsis’ to name the acquisition of revolutionary consciousness while evading prison censorship.
- Gramsci conceived the Prison Notebooks as a project for the ages.
- Gramsci derives his passive revolution concept from Cuoco but transforms it
- Gramsci described the Western State inconsistently as both outer ditch and citadel
- Gramsci died in 1937 in a Rome clinic, days after his sentence expired
- Gramsci disguised ideal future systems as the past to evade censors.
- Gramsci dismissed some socialist thinkers as hollow absorbers of borrowed culture
- Gramsci distinguishes Marx’s rational dialectic from a merely materialist inversion of Hegel
- Gramsci distinguishes non-party informational papers from official party organs
- Gramsci frames Marxism as a Reformation uniting philosophy and politics
- Gramsci generalized the dual perspective beyond its tactical origins in Zinoviev
- Gramsci groups Kantianism, Aristotelian-Scholastic thought, and positivism in a shared transcendentalist matrix
- Gramsci held a minority seizure of power without mass organisms would be quickly overthrown
- Gramsci held that only mass struggle could overthrow fascism
- Gramsci held that revolutionary politics requires active intervention in history, not passive waiting.
- Gramsci judged the PCI’s failure to win socialist workers a reactionary triumph
- Gramsci never fixed one consistent definition of the State or civil society
- Gramsci never separated hegemony and consent from force and domination
- Gramsci opens whether the French revolution-restoration model can apply to other states
- Gramsci opposed Comintern policy in 1923 as firmly as Bordiga did.
- Gramsci poses whether modern theory can contradict the masses’ unschooled spontaneous feelings.
- Gramsci proposes virtues that sustain a party’s hegemonic culture against older ones
- Gramsci read Americanism as a symptom of a major historical shift in production relations.
- Gramsci read Machiavelli and Marx as twin theorists of militant action.
- Gramsci reads Machiavelli as legitimizing political leaders who defy reigning ideology
- Gramsci reduces Marx’s abstractions to mere pedagogical devices
- Gramsci refused to separate hegemony and consent from force and coercion
- Gramsci rejected any Marxism that separated knowledge from how it is acquired
- Gramsci rejected Croce’s dialectic for ignoring real class conflict in history
- Gramsci rejected faction labels of left and right as falsifying real political strategies
- Gramsci rejected left-right faction labels as inadequate to party strategy.
- Gramsci rejected predictions deferring revolution because they would force tactical retreats
- Gramsci rejected simple left-right labels for political leadership choices
- Gramsci rejected the deterministic Marxism that forbid revolution before capitalism developed.
- Gramsci rejected the fascist analogy equating Mussolini with Caesar
- Gramsci rejects Feuerbachian non-dialectical materialism as a philosophical position
- Gramsci rejects paternalist religion-as-primitive-education dressed as historicism.
- Gramsci rejects religious schooling by infantilizing the people as primitives.
- Gramsci resisted reducing political disagreements to factional labels
- Gramsci saw trade-union reformism as resisting mass organization from below
- Gramsci sustained his will through revolutionary movement belonging, not privileges
- Gramsci treats knowledge as superstructure expressing human needs and historical conditions.
- Gramsci underestimated fascism’s internal strength and stability
- Gramsci uses civil society to mean political and cultural hegemony, not Hegel’s economic sphere.
- Gramsci uses Hegel’s rational-real formula to name a moment fusing structure with superstructure.
- Gramsci was held in near-total isolation and surveillance in Milan for over a year
- Gramsci wrote nothing about Russia despite living there for eighteen months
- Gramsci wrote the Prison Notebooks during an eleven-year physical death-agony
- Gramsci’s ‘passive revolution’ concept remained internally ambiguous and unstable
- Gramsci’s ‘totalitarian intelligentsia’ means a unified, all-absorbing intellectual stratum, not a despotism
- Gramsci’s ‘totalitarian’ means all-embracing, not pejorative
- Gramsci’s 1926 theses rejected any stable post-fascist democratic phase
- Gramsci’s censorship forced a coded vocabulary for Marxist class concepts
- Gramsci’s censorship-driven vocabulary distinguishes fundamental classes from castes
- Gramsci’s Centre repudiated Italy’s pre-Livorno socialist tradition as provincial
- Gramsci’s chronic illness shaped his life and the conditions under which he wrote.
- Gramsci’s civil society shifts meaning from economic sphere to hegemony sphere
- Gramsci’s concept of ‘Dirigente’ links cultural hegemony to workers controlling the work process
- Gramsci’s concept of historical regularity derives from Ricardo’s political economy, not natural science.
- Gramsci’s concept of totality is a neutral unifying term, not a pejorative one
- Gramsci’s dirigere terms resist single English translation equivalents
- Gramsci’s early differences with Bordiga concerned theory-practice relations and party strategy.
- Gramsci’s early hardship formed his insistence that learning is disciplined work
- Gramsci’s early revolutionary voluntarism was accused of Bergsonian influence he had not directly read
- Gramsci’s factory-council focus delayed but ultimately grounded his party work
- Gramsci’s family poverty was political, driven by his father’s imprisonment for local opposition.
- Gramsci’s Italian cannot be reliably translated into English by his editors.
- Gramsci’s leadership combined anti-sectarian party norms with mass responsiveness
- Gramsci’s Lyons theses broke cleanly from Italy’s pre-1921 socialist tradition
- Gramsci’s non-abstentionist communist platform was rejected by Bordiga’s faction
- Gramsci’s notebooks are too fragmentary for definitive claims about his project.
- Gramsci’s philology means studying the Certain as distinct from the True
- Gramsci’s philosophy of praxis links theory inseparably to practice and action
- Gramsci’s philosophy of praxis unites Reformation and French Revolution
- Gramsci’s political divergence from Bordiga centered on the theory-practice relation.
- Gramsci’s prison letters persist through deprivation without self-pity
- Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks were written under fascist imprisonment and smuggled out.
- Gramsci’s prison terminology camouflaged revolutionary concepts against censorship
- Gramsci’s prison writings allude opaquely to politics because censorship barred direct speech
- Gramsci’s prison-coded language hides radical theory in aesthetic terms
- Gramsci’s project centers on forging working-class organic intellectuals
- Gramsci’s regional grievance shaped his later anti-colonial internationalism.
- Gramsci’s shared anti-centrism with Bordiga delayed his open dissent
- Gramsci’s split with Bordiga turned on party-mass relations and strategy, not overall analysis
- Gramsci’s strategy rejected a post-fascist democratic phase as impossible and unstable
- Gramsci’s theory is fundamentally polemical rather than disinterested.
- Gramsci’s theses rejected democratic transition and any broad reformed united front
- Gramsci’s thinking was inherently polemical, aimed at concrete adversaries
- Gramsci’s worker-peasant alliance strategy originated in the Southern Question
- Grasping a theory’s main principles is insufficient for correct application.
- Great powers routinely fund internal opposition parties in rival states to weaken them
- Great powers weaken rivals by backing their internal opposition parties
- Group conflict arises from worldview threat to existential meaning
- Group conflicts serve distinction and cohesion; doctrinal content is interchangeable
- Groups demand State intervention in their favor and neutrality against adversaries.
- Groups invoke state neutrality only when they cannot dominate it
- Guerrilla tactics suit weak minorities while commandos require large latent reserve forces
- Guicciardini advocated retreat into private interest as refuge from public life
- Gumperz defined politics as producing consent to a system’s measures
- Hegel achieved in one system the awareness of contradictions formerly spread across many
- Hegel alone achieved consciousness of contradictions within a single system
- Hegel saw each people’s spirit as shaping its religion, constitution, and philosophy.
- Hegemonic democracy depends on upward mobility of the led groups
- Hegemonic democracy permits molecular movement from led to leading groups
- Hegemonic rule allows the led to pass molecularly into the leading group.
- Hegemony as a concept traces to Lenin’s anti-economist revolutionary theory, not his vocabulary.
- Hegemony can be achieved through dominance over the work process.
- Hegemony is achieved by more than mere class dominance
- Hegemony means intellectuals rule by consent while dictatorship rules by force
- Hegemony means making a class the leading force of the whole nation.
- Hegemony means the party internalizing State rules as moral conduct
- Hegemony requires a separation between civil and political society
- Hegemony rests on consent backed by state coercion held in reserve
- Hegemony sometimes fuses leadership with domination in Gramsci’s usage
- Hegemony via civil society and state coercion are the two superstructural levels
- High philosophy influences the masses as external coercion, not as transforming thought
- High wages are a transitory monopoly that disappears once new production methods spread.
- High wages compel the state to regulate workers’ private spending
- High wages derive from monopoly profits and vanish once methods diffuse.
- High wages require state discipline to keep workers spending rationally
- Historians should record every step toward subaltern autonomy including false starts
- Historical action requires welding dispersed wills into one cultural-social unity.
- Historical acts require a common cultural-social worldview unifying dispersed individual wills
- Historical change arrives only when material conditions are already ripe
- Historical competition, not will, determines which ideologies win mass adhesion
- Historical economism reduces history to individual greed and technical change
- Historical fatalism played a role like predestination did for modernity
- Historical law-statements require generalizing away from unique facts
- Historical laws are constituted regularities, not metaphysical or causal determinants
- Historical materialism is fundamentally historicist, not metaphysical
- Historical materialism superseded subjectivist philosophy by posing its questions historicist terms
- Historical outcomes require analyzing auxiliary groups, not just fundamental class forces
- Historical prediction really expresses practical political effort, not scientific knowledge
- Historical tasks arise only when their material preconditions already exist
- Historical-political typologies are interpretive criteria, not rigid predicting schemata
- Historically necessary ideologies organize masses while arbitrary ones only stir individuals
- Historicism applied to itself threatens the convictions needed for political action
- History can redirect itself by covert means despite the vagaries of human wills.
- History shapes diet and taste, not the reverse
- History’s unity is a developing process, not a presupposition.
- Human beings are processes of their own actions, not fixed essences
- Human collectivities resist mechanical proportional analysis because qualitative capacities dominate
- Human essence is the ensemble of social relations, not an individual abstraction
- Human freedom is achieved socially, not through nature
- Human nature is defined by the complex of social relations, not fixed essence
- Human nature is the ever-changing complex of social relations, not a fixed essence
- Human nature is the totality of historically determined social relations
- Human nature is the totality of historically determined social relations, not a fixed essence.
- Human self-development is inseparable from transforming external social relations
- Human societies vary widely, supporting a potentialist view of nature
- Human will makes deterministic social science impossible and science itself political
- Humans are constituted by their social relations rather than an intrinsic essence
- Humans can truly know only what they themselves have made.
- Idealism denies objective knowledge and makes God a creation of the intellect.
- Idealism since Croce has repeatedly credited Bruno with anticipating modern anti-transcendentalist thought.
- Idealism’s failure to prove the Other’s existence collapses into metaphysical realism.
- Idealist aesthetics identify form and content, not technique and plot
- Idealist revisions of Marxism came from pure intellectuals while orthodoxy came from activists.
- Ideas become a material force when carried into revolutionary political practice.
- Ideas become durable only when they penetrate the masses as collective belief
- Identifying State with government constitutes the economic-corporate form of politics.
- Ideological appearances are historically necessary and valid despite their perishability.
- Ideological critique alone cannot resolve; only revolutionary praxis can
- Ideological factors lag behind economic ones and require conscious political struggle
- Ideological forms are how people become conscious of economic conflict
- Ideological forms are where historical agents perceive and wage their struggles.
- Ideological fronts differ fundamentally from military fronts in strategy
- Ideological struggle must target the strongest adversary, not the weakest
- Ideological struggle requires engaging elite adversaries, not minor ones, unlike military tactics.
- Ideological struggle requires engaging one’s strongest adversaries, unlike warfare
- Ideologically backward classes can still hold advanced practical functions
- Ideology’s shift from science of ideas to system of ideas demands historical explanation
- Idioms encode folk judgments about people who claim credit for others’ labor.
- Illegal private violence has a political function only in politically enfeebled states
- Immanence is the unifying concept translating German philosophy into historicist form
- Immanentism is progressive only when historicised and materialist
- Immanentist philosophies fail by remaining confined to elite circles
- Immigrant labor fills unskilled work while natives hold direction and skilled trades
- Impoverished rural strata use left-wing subversivism as blackmail while siding with the right
- Imprisonment can be endured as continued productive struggle rather than defeat.
- Imprisonment shifted Gramsci’s struggle from active to patient endurance
- Imprisonment threatens the prisoner’s belief that past struggles had meaning
- Improvised charismatic movements can outperform established organic parties in action
- In advanced industrial states, wars of manoeuvre diminish to tactical rather than strategic roles.
- In extreme national crises industrialists fall back on the landed class’s permanent party
- In Italy ‘middle class’ means the intellectual and professional strata
- In its own field the party functions more completely than the State.
- In Renaissance politics religion was civil society, the hegemonic apparatus of the ruling group.
- In the West civil society is a sturdy fortress behind the state’s outer ditch
- Incest occurred in 30 percent of families in Italy’s most patriarchal rural regions
- Independent factory committees clashed with seeking union-institution alliances
- Individualism and sectarianism both constitute forms of political apoliticism
- Individuality cannot escape the social system because its inner essence already embodies that system
- Industrial civilization can develop inside a feudal-bureaucratic shell
- Industrial civilization’s habits arise through coercive subjugation of instinct, not consent
- Industrial class politics displaced but did not erase Gramsci’s regional-peasant concerns
- Industrial non-uniformity generates privileged closed-shop labour aristocracies.
- Industrial rationalization of production requires rationalizing the sexual instinct
- Industrial work rationalization requires reshaping workers’ entire mode of living, not just their labor
- Industrialist parties failed because they represented a class nexus, not one class.
- Industrialists shift support among parties rather than founding their own
- Industrialists wield influence by funding whichever party suits their balance of forces
- Inefficient parliamentarianism does not justify praising bureaucracy
- Inner-party Soviet struggles had shifted alliances by 1925-26
- Institutional authority can override a party’s own internal majority preference
- Institutionalized religion can transform from a revitalizing force into a narcotic for the masses.
- Institutions are instruments made of thinking humans, not robots.
- Institutions forcibly retake space surrendered in earlier concessions to protesters
- Instruction inevitably becomes education because no pupil is purely passive
- Instrumental progress cannot explain scientific advance across fields
- Integralism masked reactionary social effects behind purely doctrinal theological language.
- Intellectual clairvoyance only becomes political when it becomes disseminated passion
- Intellectual clarity only becomes political force when it turns into shared popular passion
- Intellectual clarity only becomes politically effective as disseminated passion
- Intellectual creativity needs freedom from fixed disciplinary limits
- Intellectual desertion causes cultural sterility until the people breed new intellectuals
- Intellectual excellence requires mechanically coerced psycho-physical habits from childhood.
- Intellectual gatherings concentrate influence and steer lower-rank intellectuals by caste spirit.
- Intellectual growth and mass cultural elevation advance dialectically together
- Intellectual influence travels indirectly through intermediaries rather than by direct reading
- Intellectual influence without popular ties prompts organic centralism theories.
- Intellectual revolutions require confronting social forces, not just rival philosophies
- Intellectual self-discipline and moral independence must precede all specialisation
- Intellectual status belongs to anyone performing a directive and organisational function
- Intellectual status is defined by social relations, not by work’s intrinsic nature
- Intellectual strata can be graded by their organic connection to a dominant social group
- Intellectual strata emerge from concrete historical class processes, not abstract democracy
- Intellectual struggle targets representative exponents, not every individual opinion holder
- Intellectuals act as functionaries of the superstructures mediating society and production
- Intellectuals are class-bound, not an autonomous social category
- Intellectuals are defined by social relations, not intrinsic activity.
- Intellectuals are never class-neutral but split into traditional and organic types
- Intellectuals attract followers only while their class genuinely advances society.
- Intellectuals claiming continuity with the past are fossilized remnants
- Intellectuals cut off from popular passion become a bureaucratic caste unable to make history
- Intellectuals divide into traditional and organic groups tied to class formations
- Intellectuals must distinguish durable instrumental values from transient philosophical ones inherited from the past.
- Intellectuals revise their own published history to appease a new regime
- Intellectuals who cling to inherited language are conservative and reactionary.
- Intellectuals who detach from popular feeling become a bureaucratic caste, not true intellectuals
- Intellectuals who remain detached from popular passions become a caste, not leaders
- Intellectuals’ self-image as autonomous shapes ideology and politics.
- Intellectuals’ self-image as autonomous stems from their historical esprit de corps
- Intellectuals’ self-perception as paternalistic versus organic determines whether masses enter the state
- Intense political passion must be convertible into moral duty
- Internal party struggles over bolshevisation eroded the Left’s strength through multiple converging forces
- Internal peasant stratification does not threaten the worker-peasant alliance.
- International bodies like religions function as transnational political parties mediating between nations
- International power relations shape each nation’s internal class-political development
- International relations logically follow domestic social-structural changes
- Interpretations of Gramsci require his pre-1926 political context, not later criteria.
- Introducing Fordism into Europe demanded extreme coercion against moral resistance.
- Isolated smallholders combine into a nation only by mere addition, not social relation
- Italian ‘internationalism’ was actually medieval Catholic cosmopolitanism without national consciousness
- Italian anarcho-syndicalist leaders moved from radicalism into fascism via nationalism.
- Italian aristocratic deference to foreign rulers persisted even as nationalists refused it
- Italian bourgeois revolution aims were sacrificed to Piedmontese state ambitions
- Italian Catholic voters backed liberal government candidates to block socialist gains
- Italian city-state oligarchies preceded and legitimized princely dynasties
- Italian communes failed to transcend the corporative phase into a modern state
- Italian communists opposed fusion with reformist socialists even after expulsions
- Italian communists read fascist repression as proof of imminent revolution in 1924.
- Italian Communists read mounting repression as proof of revolution’s approach
- Italian corporatism arose from economic policing needs, not industrial modernisation.
- Italian corporatism predated Fascism with Catholic, Socialist, and capitalist backers.
- Italian criminology founded by Ferri rejected moral retribution for deterrence-based punishment
- Italian dirigenza terms resist single-English-equivalent translation
- Italian futurism shifted from popular anticultural revolt to fascist nationalism during the war
- Italian history is driven by the city-countryside relation as its fundamental motor force
- Italian idealism and Second International socialism both drew on German sources.
- Italian industry profited enormously from the First World War
- Italian internationalism was really a weak populism built on cultural rather than political unity
- Italian Left governments preserved Right policies under new personnel
- Italian maximalist socialism valued principle-preservation over concrete political strategy
- Italian national unity rested on a weak 1300-1700 cultural tradition rather than political history
- Italian parliamentary parties collapsed into personal cliques via trasformismo
- Italian parliamentary parties dissolved into factions that converged into one ruling bloc
- Italian party convergence under Depretis erased substantive Left-Right differences until socialism
- Italian skilled workers embraced automation while American workers opposed it
- Italian socialism’s party led a loose federation of forces, not a disciplined vanguard
- Italian state life since 1848 was characterized by transformism
- Italian unification faced open resistance from French national interests
- Italian unification posed a national question only in partial aspects, not fully
- Italian unification repressed peasant insurrections against landowners
- Italian unity was North-over-South hegemony, not equality.
- Italian urbanism cannot be read as a simple index of industrialisation
- Italy created state mortgage institutions to rescue banks during the Great Depression
- Italy’s active-to-passive population ratio was among Europe’s worst
- Italy’s Catholic party supported fascism before being suppressed and dissolved by 1926.
- Italy’s communal bourgeoisie failed to transcend the economic-corporate phase and form a national state
- Italy’s cosmopolitan intellectuals both caused and reflected its political fragmentation.
- Italy’s failure to form a national state left the Papacy as its absolutist center
- Italy’s first universal-suffrage election hinged on a Catholic-liberal pact against socialism
- Italy’s Renaissance bourgeoisie failed to create a national state while Northern Europe succeeded.
- Italy’s school system divides academic from vocational training
- Jacobinism exemplifies the ex novo formation of a collective will.
- Jacobinism means organically uniting city and countryside through peasant consent
- Jacobinism’s constructive popular-mass content was split from its destructive sectarian image.
- Jacobins forged town-country bonds, persisting in successor forms after defeat.
- Japan industrialized within a surviving feudal-bureaucratic shell unlike Western patterns
- Job mechanization repurposes reflection as error and erases interpretive labor
- Job qualification rises as a worker’s intellectual engagement with the task falls
- Journalists claim intellectual status by modeling letters and philosophy.
- Judging a regime as historically transitory prevents that judgement from becoming endorsement.
- Judging past thought as mere folly is itself a metaphysical error
- Junior-officer class origins underpin Bonapartist Caesarism forms
- Juridical order is ontological while political order is critical and evaluative
- Knowing social relations as historically formed already modifies them
- Knowing social relations historically enables individuals to multiply their agency collectively
- Knowledge acquisition is an active creative process, not mechanical reception
- Knowledge and objectivity are only knowable in relation to humanity
- Labriola originated the philosophy of praxis as the unity of theory and practice.
- Labriola saw the philosophy of praxis as independently self-developing
- Labriola’s Marxism was widely misread in an idealist direction.
- Laissez-faire is itself a form of deliberate state regulation.
- Laissez-faire is itself a form of state regulation, not an absence of it
- Laissez-faire liberalism only rotates ruling-party office, never changes State structure
- Landless agricultural labourers are peasants without land rather than industrialized farm workers
- Landlord allies pushed Italian capital toward outright working-class repression
- Landowner tenancy policies deliberately fragmented the Po valley workforce
- Landowners’ tenure choices deliberately fragmented the peasantry into class allies
- Landowning strata profit directly from keeping peasants impoverished and degraded
- Language changes through class culture acquisition and hegemonic national languages
- Language choice serves intellectual hegemony, not mere communication
- Language is a stratified multiplicity reflecting historico-social differences, not a unitary thing
- Language preserves fossilized worldviews within its living metaphors
- Large samples average out random variation to reveal underlying economic laws
- Latin as a dead language can be dissected analytically while living languages cannot
- Lavoisier was executed for raising taxes, not for his chemistry
- Lavoisier’s execution stemmed from his tax-collector post rather than his chemistry
- Law functions to make the ruling group homogeneous and create social conformism
- Law is the state’s instrument for creating a desired type of citizen
- Law must be stripped of all transcendental and absolutist residues.
- Leaders chronically assume that declaring an order just makes it happen
- Leaders mistakenly assume obedience among their own group must be automatic
- Leadership change in the P.C.I. cannot be explained by Comintern influence alone.
- Learners actively create meaning even within abstract drill
- Left factions failed to unite because their strategies were mutually contradictory
- Legal form alone is insufficient for Americanisation to take hold.
- Legislative capacity requires both coercive instruments and spontaneous mass consent
- Legitimate legal order requires internal assent, not external coercion
- Lenin built the doctrine of hegemony to supplement a force-based theory of the state.
- Lenin contested the Social Democratic division of labour between workers and intellectuals
- Lenin defined economism as confining workers to economic struggle without politics.
- Lenin held that the proletariat spontaneously develops only trade-union, not revolutionary, consciousness
- Lenin saw that revolution required shifting tactics from East to West
- Leopardi mocked progress optimism by setting civilization against Vesuvius’s threat.
- Liberal Catholic movements embedded bourgeois liberal assumptions before disappearing after 1870.
- Liberal state forms are prerequisites for Americanised industrial monopoly
- Liberalism and syndicalism serve dominant versus still-subaltern groups.
- Liberation promises without material redistribution leave peasants uncomprehending and re-criminalized
- Libertarian sexual ideology spread by leisured elites degrades working-class habits
- Linguistic form lags behind radical historical change
- Literary judgments require historical knowledge to separate the personal from the representative
- Literary polemics over Supercountry and Supercity masked a real Italian social conflict
- Llull could not convince even in a debate he staged to vindicate his rationality.
- Local republics sustained resistance after their formal armies collapsed.
- Lorenzo’s death ended the Italian balance of power and invited foreign domination
- Lorenzo’s death in 1492 triggered Italian foreign domination until the Risorgimento
- Lost profits privatize while losses nationalize in statist capitalism.
- Low state-guaranteed savings demand an excessively low standard of living for workers
- Loyal party discipline must flow from conviction, not mechanical coercion
- Lukacs did not actually maintain a dualism between natural and human history.
- Lukacs’s dialectic is historically monist, not dualist between nature and humanity
- Machiavelli blamed transitory conditions, not human nature, for Italy’s failure
- Machiavelli derived political rules from objective conditions of struggle, not ethics
- Machiavelli distinguished political action from political science
- Machiavelli must be read as historically situated, not as a timeless political scientist
- Machiavelli pioneered fusing political ideology with science as myth
- Machiavelli premised Italy’s Renaissance on founding a national state.
- Machiavelli reasoned elliptically from unified France and Spain to general state rules
- Machiavelli reduces everything to politics, the art of securing permanent consent
- Machiavelli reframed fortune as circumstance and virtu as human capacity
- Machiavelli sought willing follower loyalty to a leader despite ideological clash
- Machiavelli wrote as an agitator urging action, not as a systematic theorist
- Machiavelli’s concepts function as intuitions and symbols, not metaphysics
- Machiavelli’s fortune concept is lived intuition, not metaphysical abstraction
- Machiavelli’s logical argument functions as the people’s own inner reasoning
- Machiavelli’s political concepts were worldly intuitions, not metaphysics
- Machiavelli’s political priorities distort his military theory
- Machiavelli’s political theory centers on securing permanent consent through the art of governing.
- Machiavelli’s political theory expresses Italy’s specific structural contradictions of his era
- Machiavelli’s political writing embodies an original philosophy of praxis rather than utopia
- Machiavelli’s politics demanded drawing rulers closer to the people
- Machiavelli’s Prince drew on foreign, not Italian, unification experience.
- Machiavelli’s Prince epilogue functions as a political manifesto through mythic identification
- Machiavelli’s realism derives rules from objective conditions rather than ethics
- Machiavelli’s science of state mirrors the era’s drive toward absolute monarchies
- Machiavelli’s thought answers three nested layers of Italian political crisis
- Machiavelli’s virtu means human capacity, ability, and self-measure, not divine virtue
- Machiavelli’s virtu means Renaissance capacity, not scholastic virtue or Livian valour
- Machiavelli’s work is immediate political action, not utopian blueprint
- Machiavelli’s work is political action, not utopian blueprint or abstract science.
- Making education artificially easy distorts the training needed for genuine intellectual work.
- Man is a process, the product of his own actions
- Many political acts spring from organizational needs, not structure
- Many political and ideological acts serve organizational coherence needs
- Manzoni’s Betrothed fuses Enlightenment reason uneasily with Catholic Quietism.
- Marsilio of Padua blamed papal temporal power for Italy’s wars
- Marx distinguished scientific determination of material production from ideological forms of consciousness
- Marx distinguishes material economic transformation from ideological forms of consciousness
- Marx locates reality in phenomenal forms, not behind them
- Marx preferred ‘rational dialectic’ to ‘materialist dialectic’
- Marx read Hegel’s Philosophy of Right as a critical analysis, not a conservative apology
- Marx read Hegel’s Philosophy of Right as both critical analysis and negation.
- Marx refused the label materialist for his own philosophy of praxis
- Marx refused to reduce history to a single ultimate economic cause
- Marx’s concept of necessity derives from Ricardo’s determined market, not natural science
- Marx’s inversion of Hegel is oppositional, not a simple turn from idealism to materialism
- Marx’s philosophy is irreducible to its Hegelian and materialist sources
- Marx’s practical aphorisms conceal an implicit full philosophy
- Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach reject separating theory from practice
- Marxism allied with foreign doctrines to fight religious residue among the masses
- Marxism continues immanence stripped of metaphysics onto historical terrain
- Marxism degenerated into economism by fusing with laissez-faire liberalism
- Marxism historicizes the Hegelian idea across both structure and superstructure.
- Marxism influenced modern thought most powerfully through diffuse, unacknowledged absorption
- Marxism is absolute historicism, not metaphysical materialism
- Marxism is essentially Hegel’s philosophy combined with Ricardo’s economics.
- Marxism synthesizes the Reformation plus the French Revolution into a unified theory
- Marxism’s alliance with vulgar materialism responded to popular religious culture
- Marxism’s core innovation is rejecting transcendence, not asserting materialism
- Marxism’s educational mission to the masses absorbed its intellectual strength
- Marxist currents widely subordinated theory to practice’s needs
- Marxist intellectuals historically emerged from intermediary classes rather than the people.
- Marxist orthodoxy allied chiefly with traditional materialism over Kantianism
- Marxist orthodoxy derived its core concepts from Lange’s conventional materialism
- Marxist philosophy continues and purifies the philosophy of immanence.
- Marxist philosophy fuses German philosophy with English political economy
- Marxist theory has been widely framed as subordinate to political practice.
- Marxist theory has itself ossified into the popular prejudice it critiqued
- Marxist theory itself is a product of historical contradictions and will disappear with them
- Mass conviction rests on social group membership, not recalled arguments
- Mass ideology differs from the elite philosophical cornerstones that must be engaged.
- Mass ideology differs from the scientific syntheses that anchor it.
- Mass ideology must be distinguished from its great philosophical cornerstones
- Mass movements develop the high culture only in later phases
- Mass philosophy must start from common sense and take polemical form
- Mass-intellectual splits are healed by disciplining elites, not elevating masses
- Masses will not sacrifice for leaders who offer no concrete return
- Mastering a theory’s principles alone does not ensure correct application
- Material conditions do not mechanistically determine history; social development shapes material life.
- Material forces are social creations, not discoveries of preexisting nature
- Material forces of production are the measureable skeleton of historical process
- Material forces of production determine the superstructure and drive social revolutions
- Materialism polemically named any thought excluding transcendence.
- Materialist mentality self-reinforces through its own dissemination
- Materialist method develops quality through measurable quantitative work
- Matter matters only as socially organized for production
- Mature civil society resists economic crises like trench systems resist artillery
- Mazzini favored professional armies over popular insurrection to defend the Roman Republic
- Mazzini-inspired insurrection failed because aristocrats withheld support
- Mazzini’s followers could break with him over assassination tactics
- Mazzinism offered no self-criticism from within its own ranks
- Mechanical causality cannot account for qualitative change or historical novelty.
- Mechanical determinism makes people believe history moves without them.
- Mechanical repetition in childhood builds the psychophysical habits scholarship later requires.
- Mechanicism functioned as the religion of the subaltern masses
- Mechanized work frees the worker’s brain rather than mummifying it
- Media beauty competitions cultivate commodified feminine status in ruling classes.
- Mediaeval proletarians could ally and rebel but classical slaves could not
- Mediation by work yields a dialectical world-conception free of magic.
- Medieval subaltern groups could ally upward while classical slaves could not
- Medium and small rural bourgeoisie dominate the bureaucratic career in modern Europe
- Members join parties for directive functions, not economic gain.
- Mere verbal identification of individual and state changes no one’s consciousness.
- Merging knowledge and being avoids relativism only if a single unified human subject exists
- Meridionalist equality among urban elites was historical fiction masking northern domination
- Metaphysics is any assertion of extra-historical abstract universal truth.
- Metaphysics is any system presented as extra-historical abstract truth
- Michels, Mosca, and Pareto founded elite theory that indirectly influenced Gramsci
- Militarised labour policy was adopted in 1920 and eroded by trade-union opposition.
- Military analysts gauge capability by measurable inputs despite tenuous links to outcomes
- Military character can operate through civilians without open army participation
- Military coups in Spain rise from elite clique rivalries, not rank-and-file revolt
- Military influence masks the class origin of its officer stratum
- Military leadership cannot be separated from political leadership in national struggles
- Military oppression of a nation also needs the politico-military terrain to be explained
- Misreading organic-conjunctural relations yields either economism or ideologism errors
- Misunderstanding the state as dictatorship plus hegemony causes strategic errors
- Misunderstanding the state’s dual nature causes strategic errors in politics
- Mobility into intellectual roles severs a person’s organic link to their class of origin
- Moderates won intellectuals by offering a dignified national philosophy
- Modern anti-historical individualism means private appropriation of socially produced wealth
- Modern Caesarism is police-run rather than military-run
- Modern Caesarism operates through party and union coercion, not military coups
- Modern cultural authority lacks the institutional center it once had
- Modern democratic equality originated as biological species equality
- Modern individualism emerged from the Renaissance-Reformation shift to immanentism
- Modern Islamic economic and political structures replicate rather than differ from global capitalism
- Modern science advanced by expelling Aristotle and the Bible from its authority
- Modern state disintegration is worse than medieval because it lacks integrative forces
- Modern state leaders need technical literacy to adjudicate expert proposals
- Modern states replace the mechanical bloc with active hegemony by dominant groups
- Moltke the younger was unfairly scapegoated for losing the 1914 Marne campaign
- Moltke was scapegoated to preserve the myth of Schlieffen’s planning genius
- Montesquieu’s separation of powers shaped the American Constitution
- Moral and cultural reform cannot proceed detached from economic reform
- Moral crises among elites do not destabilize workers already disciplined by necessity
- Moral decay panic is really a struggle between two competing conformisms
- Moral reform requires economic reform as its concrete form
- Moral-cultural reform must be grounded in economic reform to take effect.
- Moral-religious reformers can gain popular support by predicting calamities that then appear fulfilled
- Moralistic unitarianism suppressed objective evidence of regional conflict as intimidation.
- Mosca’s political class and Pareto’s elite are earlier versions of Gramsci’s intellectuals concept
- Movements gain political independence by learning that social conditions have contingent causes.
- Movements only become transformative when they learn nothing exists naturally.
- Movements that reach the people pay for it with slowed theoretical development
- Mussolini framed fascism as opposition to democracy and majority rule
- Mussolini rejected opposition as unnecessary and internalized it within the regime.
- Naive empiricism masks dogmatism by claiming scientific method
- Names can be explained by the contradiction of what they denote
- Naples’ economy is organized around rentier consumption rather than productive industry
- Naples’ enlightened rationalist intellectuals became the Jacobins of the 1799 republic
- National historical variations depend partly on international relations
- National living-standard averages conceal chronic malnutrition among lower strata.
- National parties defiance of Moscow aimed to investigate Soviet conditions
- National party lines could diverge from shifting Comintern strategy in the mid-1920s
- National relations of force interlock with international relations to form unique historical combinations
- National unity depended on cohesion among all urban forces
- Nationalism converted radical syndicalist leaders into fascists via transformism.
- Nationalist commitment and aristocratic deference diverged in Risorgimento-era Italy
- Nationalist polemic can recast a food staple as foreign cultural contamination.
- Natural forces become historical only through social creation and use
- Natural forces become historically operative only when production harnesses them
- Neapolitan industry serves landowner consumption rather than productive accumulation
- Neglected spontaneous revolts enable right-wing coups during economic crises
- Neo-Guelphism offered a papal federation vision defeated by the Risorgimento monarchy
- Neo-Guelphism sought an Italian federation under the Pope
- New conceptions spread by rational form, authority, or organisational membership
- New orders are built by those who bear the burden, not the condemned
- New ruling groups must initially inherit existing functionary categories rather than replace them.
- New work methods require a matching mode of living and thinking
- New world-conceptions diffuse through rational form, authority, or organizational belonging.
- Newspapers split into nominally non-party popular papers and restricted party organs
- Nineteenth-century conservative elites pioneered social welfare legislation to preempt radical demands
- Nineteenth-century parliamentary hegemony channeled rising energies while continuously re-formation society
- Nineteenth-century state-church conflicts were bourgeois-democratic struggles against reactionary residues
- No class-state can be a regulated society; order and harmony require communism.
- No systematic research attributes the original philosophy of praxis thought
- Non-participation in fascism can still promote a depoliticising justificationism toward it
- Normal hegemony balances force and consent so that force appears based on majority consent
- Normal parliamentary rule works by balancing force and consent, with corruption bridging them
- Northern and Southern Italian intellectual strata have structurally distinct forms
- Northern urban forces subordinated Southern urban leadership within national unity
- Not every ideological shift directly mirrors the economic base.
- Objective conditions become political power only through organized capable cadres
- Objective historical conditions only become politically effective through organized cadres and capable leadership.
- Objective possibility constitutes freedom but requires knowing and wanting
- Objectivity is historical and exists only in relation to man.
- Official philosophy is reduced to a mental Taylorism serving industry
- Old European societies contain sedimented relics that check rapid historical progress
- Old ruling forces granted concessions only to gain time for counter-attack
- Only a class that will abolish itself can build a true ethical State
- Only already-dead languages can be taught through analytical dissection
- Only dead languages can be studied by analytic, abstracting grammar methods
- Only irreproducible individual works deserve the label quality; reproducible goods are quantity
- Only the Greek carbonarist revolution of 1820-21 achieved durable results
- Only unreproducible individual works qualify as quality; reproducible things are quantity.
- Only what humans make can be truly known, since maker and object coincide
- Opponents exploit historicist self-reference to accuse it of moral scepticism
- Opposition forces fragmented and refused a common front, easing fascism’s legal consolidation.
- Oppositions between quantity and quality mask political choices about who holds each.
- Optimism and pessimism are both sentimental dispositions toward history
- Orally delivered arguments tend toward superficiality of logic
- Orally delivered theory tends toward superficiality and uncritical habits
- Ordine Nuovo located revolutionary development in the productive organism, not the state
- Organic and democratic centralism are organisational forms hiding real political relations
- Organic ideologies organize masses while arbitrary ones only produce individual movements
- Organic intellectuals must arise from and stay in contact with the masses
- Organic versus traditional intellectuals is the key axis for analysis
- Organic working-class intellectuals link production roles to political direction
- Organisational impotence at national level sealed defeat despite the masses enacting the idea.
- Organizational coherence drives political action more than economic structure does
- Organizational discontinuity and improvisation outweigh the risk of bureaucratization
- Organizational rupture with old socialism did not require ideological rupture too
- Original thought can also inherit a prior heritage
- Parasitic urbanism describes cities that only consume not create
- Parliament’s real status within the State structure is an open question
- Parliamentary rule achieved permanent urban-class hegemony through privately organised consent
- Parties are not passive expressions of classes but act back upon them
- Party control of all mass movements leads to political immobilism
- Party leadership changes must be read through local history, not external dictates alone
- Party spirit, not individualism, is the foundation of State spirit
- Party unity must rest on conviction, not mechanical coercion.
- Passive revolution denotes either revolution without masses or molecular hidden change
- Passive revolution is an interpretive criterion, not a fatalistic programme
- Passive revolution is the political form of a war of position
- Passive revolution is the thesis absorbing the antithesis to avoid being transcended.
- Passive revolution theory risks fatalism but remains dialectically dependent on a vigorous antithesis
- Passive revolutions can unfold molecularly beneath society’s surface
- Passive revolutions suppress some contradictions only to spawn new ones
- Passive-revolution ideology reinforces hegemony by manufacturing expectation and hope
- Past philosophical systems remain historically valid even after being superseded
- Peasant and intellectual initiatives advance each other reciprocally
- Peasant and intellectual movements reinforce each other dialectically
- Peasant cruelty to childless elders drives couples toward having children
- Peasant political autonomy varies inversely with landowner organized strength
- Peasants fought for Austria because nationalism seemed a gentlemen’s affair
- People accept necessary sacrifice but revolt against needless or neglectful losses
- People answer what they think a question means, not what is literally asked
- People answer what they think you mean, not what you say
- People can outsource self-discipline when willpower alone fails
- People’s supposed deficiencies are historical facts, not natural traits
- Permanent revolution succeeds only when grounded in a particular society’s concrete historical relations.
- Persistent illusions about a party’s revolutionary character prolonged resistance to new strategy.
- Personality is built through directed will, concrete means, and remaking conditions
- Persons are understood as free unifications of responsibility rather than as substances
- Philology pursues the certain, distinct from philosophy’s pursuit of the true
- Philosophers have historically served to justify established authority
- Philosophers’ conviction of expressing unity is what turns ideas into material social forces
- Philosophical elaboration must be performed within the history of philosophy
- Philosophical immediacy to practice produces vulgar conservatism rather than cultural elevation.
- Philosophical innovation matters when it becomes a mass, popular phenomenon
- Philosophical truths are historically conditioned yet avoid relativism.
- Philosophy and common sense differ in degree, not kind
- Philosophy and history are indivisible, forming a single bloc
- Philosophy becomes historically true by diffusing into the popular mentality.
- Philosophy functions as a practical instrument for political organizing
- Philosophy instruction must progress from common sense through religion to systems
- Philosophy is a concrete social activity engaging everyone, not elite abstraction
- Philosophy is a socio-practical activity uniting thought with action
- Philosophy of praxis claims historicist self-explanation beyond its predecessors.
- Philosophy of praxis elevates the masses rather than disciplining intellectuals
- Philosophy of praxis elevates the masses rather than preserves their common sense.
- Philosophy of praxis entered Italy through Labriola and united theory with practice
- Philosophy of praxis must be understood as historical methodology.
- Philosophy of praxis shifted from mechanistic fatalism toward activist unity of theory and practice.
- Philosophy that never leaves elite circles cannot transform common sense
- Philosophy unlike other specialisms is an activity proper to every human
- Philosophy works by replacing one common sense with another aligned to the ruling group
- Philosophy-of-praxis intellectuals stayed rooted in intermediary classes, not the people
- Philosophy’s history must include mass worldviews and ruling groups, not just philosophers
- Physiocracy anticipated a more complex capitalist future than its own agrarian rhetoric suggests
- Piedmont’s leaders sabotaged volunteer support and rejected mass mobilization options
- Pisacane advocated peasant armies and a war of national insurrection, anticipating the Russian Narodniks
- Po valley rural poverty appeared as a pauperism crisis in the Risorgimento
- Policies of qualitative production inevitably produce disqualified quantity and malnutrition
- Political activity is the first, most elementary level of the superstructure
- Political actors who understand their rivals’ full role hold decisive superiority
- Political and intellectual action is the true expression of economic necessity
- Political commitment, not ill health, drove Gramsci from university.
- Political ideas must be translated to local conditions to move real movements
- Political imprisonment threatens the prisoner’s conviction in his past struggle
- Political intuition means connecting disparate facts and directing passions toward action
- Political intuition means swift synthesis of disparate facts toward an end
- Political labels change meaning across languages and ideological contexts
- Political leaders must gain enough technical culture to judge expert advice
- Political leaders need technical literacy to arbitrate among experts
- Political leadership can be exercised by a replaceable inner group, not one person
- Political movements should be analyzed via mass content and balance of forces
- Political myths mobilize action through images while utopias only mislead.
- Political myths work by embodying collective will in a concrete individual.
- Political parties are mechanisms for producing organic intellectuals
- Political parties are the laboratories where world-conceptions become practical ethics
- Political parties are the most effective institutions for training leaders and followers
- Political parties can serve foreign powers rather than their own interests
- Political parties function as laboratories unifying theory and practice into new intelligentsias.
- Political parties function as organs of order and surveillance
- Political parties mediate between state coercion and voluntary moral conduct
- Political parties prove that organized permanent passion is operationally possible
- Political parties remain the most effective instrument for producing leaders
- Political positions demanding contradictory simultaneous moves become tactically weak
- Political prisoners organized peer education courses in Italian detention.
- Political radicals in backward national contexts can outpace those in advanced ones
- Political realism is an inherited skill of ruling classes, not universal knowledge
- Political resistance weakens an oppressor by dispersing its military force.
- Political self-consciousness arises through struggling against opposing hegemonies
- Political siege is reciprocal; the ruler’s resource mobilization proves the adversary’s strength
- Political slogans can be historically concrete despite appearing abstract later
- Political stances must be judged by whether they stand alone or answer other forces
- Political statistics lose validity once masses become politically active
- Political strategy must orient toward the national majority, not an international minority.
- Political struggle continues after military defeat like colonial conquest does
- Political struggle continues after military defeat on political terrain
- Political struggle resembles permanent conquest rather than finite military war.
- Political will is defined by means-end capacity, not by its goal.
- Political will means operative awareness of historical necessity in action.
- Political writing requires partisan passion, not detached scientific objectivity
- Politics disguised as culture becomes insoluble jargon.
- Politics is not a mechanical reflection of economic structure
- Politics mediates between elite and popular philosophy without eliminating hierarchy.
- Politics mediates between elite philosophy and common sense
- Politics must be established as an autonomous science within any coherent worldview
- Politics reflects structural tendencies that may never become realized
- Politics sustains permanent organizations by identifying with economics while transcending it
- Popular beliefs can carry the energy of a material force
- Popular masses accept new ideas only as heterogeneous combinations, not pure forms
- Popular masses adopt new world-views only as heterogeneous and bizarre combinations.
- Popular mobilization requires concrete concessions, not abstract appeals
- Popular political change requires diffuse ideological preparation, not just armed insurrection.
- Popular psychological study must actively transform common sense into modern mentality
- Popular religiosity is crassly materialist and close to common sense
- Popular serial fiction in 1840s Paris blended vague humanitarian and democratic ideas.
- Popular uprisings succeed only when elite allies coordinate with mass discontent
- Popular uprisings succeed when mass discontent merges with elite conspiratorial planning.
- Positing a unitary ‘human’ as a starting point is a theological residue
- Positive culture-building precedes negative polemics like anti-clericalism in hegemonic struggle
- Positivist empiricism can be as anti-historical as speculative idealism
- Positivist sociology borrows natural-science criteria and lacks the dialectical principle
- Post-1815 ‘restoration’ was a realignment limiting, not reversing, middle-class gains.
- Posthumously published works must be read provisionally, not as definitive
- Postwar hegemony had to be rebuilt around masses newly stirred into chaotic movement.
- Postwar Italy suffered economic collapse that its makeshift governments could not address
- Practitioners escape dogmas of their age better than occasional philosophers do
- Pre-capitalist cities sustain an ideological unity against the countryside
- Pre-modern states worked as mechanical blocs of semi-autonomous social groups with dual power
- Pre-Risorgimento Italian federalists offered several opposed visions of the future state.
- Pre-unification Italian federalism offered a rival vision to unitary statehood
- Prediction acquires objectivity only when tied to a programme of will.
- Prediction is never neutral but serves the predictor’s programme
- Prediction of historical events is a practical act, not a scientific act of knowledge.
- Predictive capacity lies in the will, not in the worldview itself
- Predictive superiority lies in the will, not the worldview
- Premature economism reduces politics to accusations of bad faith and duplicity
- Premature systematization produces only illusory coherence in a doctrine
- Presumed national deficiencies are historical facts, not permanent traits
- Principality and republic are not opposed but hypostatize authority and universality
- Prison censorship forced Gramsci to mask Marxists and Marxist concepts in code names
- Prison censorship forced Gramsci to read Marx mostly through Croce’s commentaries
- Prison censorship forced Gramsci to rewrite his notebooks using veiled language.
- Prison conditions shaped the form Gramsci’s theoretical work took
- Prison produced Gramsci’s entire theoretical output under surveillance.
- Prison radicalized Bordiga against Comintern policy while Tasca urged submission
- Private associations form the hegemonic apparatus underlying the coercive State
- Private corporate discipline can be absorbed into state ideology over time
- Private moral regulation becomes state function when crises demand it
- Productive forces form the measurable skeleton of historical change
- Professional skill in text reproduction requires suppressing intellectual interest in content
- Profit rates depend jointly on exploitation rate and organic composition of capital
- Progress and becoming were born together as politics in France and philosophy in Germany
- Progress as ideology differs fundamentally from becoming as philosophy
- Progress fails when its standard bearers become part of nature
- Progress is a historically-bounded ideology; becoming is a pure philosophical concept
- Progressive economic reform depends on demoting pure property rights to technico-industrial functional necessities
- Progressive parties use democratic centralism while regressive ones become unthinking bureaucratic executors
- Progressive state direction would require abolishing parasitic property income
- Property ownership always involves state intervention
- Protectionism forged capitalist-class alliance while devastating the Italian peasantry.
- Protectionism trapped Southern peasants in a dual loss of export markets and cheap goods
- Protectionist policy created the Italian North-South divide that became the Southern Question.
- Proverbs show sex-as-sport framing pervades even rural same-class relations
- Pseudo-vanguardism lacks organic links to the masses it claims to lead
- PSI war-time abstentionism left a political vacuum into which fascism expanded
- Psychoanalysis gained popularity as a response to intensified state and social coercion on individuals.
- Psychoanalysis’s postwar spread evidenced rising state coercion of individuals.
- Pure negation cannot sustain a collective will without implicit construction
- Purely international programmatics breed passivity and waiting for others to move
- Puritan ideologies dress up coercion as consent once total pressure succeeds
- Puritanical workplace surveillance serves rationalized production, not mere ideology
- Purity-first party strategy produced near-total political immobilism
- Quantity and quality form an indivisible nexus, not opposed terms
- Racial identity arises as a negative product of oppression
- Rationalized labor discipline requires directing nervous energy away from passion
- Rationalized production requires the elaboration of a new type of man
- Reading Machiavelli as timeless political science distorts his situated meaning
- Real action modifies man and reality while verbal action only creates puppets
- Real equality is experienced associationally and requires consciousness to be real
- Real mass politics unites subaltern spontaneity with conscious leadership
- Real political progress unifies theory with practice and rulers with ruled.
- Reality never conforms to abstract theoretical schemas.
- Redefining intellectuals by social function clashes with caste preconceptions
- Reducing a philosophy to a systematic sociology is naive metaphysics.
- Reducing all ideology to immediate structural causes is primitive infantilism
- Reduction to economics enables creating a new culture
- Reform fails if it does not reach the people as a national educative force
- Reform ideals must move from romantic struggle to rational method.
- Reformist union leadership can constitute a de facto second party against revolution.
- Reforms that claim to activate students actually treat them as passive recipients.
- Refusing to ally with radicalized petty-bourgeois strata delivers them back to the ruling class.
- Refusing workers’ rights of combination broke the Jacobin’s urban support base.
- Refuting an ideology requires attacking its best exponents, not its weakest
- Refuting ideas does not destroy the social forces behind them
- Regime technical efficiency can win admiration abroad for authoritarian states.
- Regimes are analyzed through their social base, not as interchangeable forms
- Regional city-countryside relations shape national political party programmes
- Regional class structure determines the type of intellectual a region produces
- Regional intellectual types mediate different class relations in North and South Italy.
- Rejecting parliamentarianism need not entail rehabilitating bureaucracy
- Religion and common sense cannot form intellectual orders without coercion
- Religion can bind intellectuals and masses only when it originates from the people
- Religion functions as a utopia reconciling real historical contradictions in mythological form
- Religion, State, and party form an indissoluble unity rather than separable priority
- Religions stay strong by preventing a split between intellectuals and lay faithful
- Religious communities endure through organized repetition of apologetics and intellectual hierarchy
- Religious institutions survive by keeping elites and masses doctrinally unified
- Religious reform agendas alienated peasants and undermined revolutionary alliance
- Religious utopianism supplies equality and freedom demands to oppressed strata
- Renaissance rulers borrowed the Church as their cultural apparatus instead of building their own
- Rentier classes accumulate savings through usurious exploitation of underfed peasants
- Reorganising production, not just control, drives deeper state intervention.
- Repetition is the best didactic means for shaping popular mentality
- Representation requires an organic feeling-understanding-knowledge chain linking rulers and ruled into a historical bloc
- Representation requires organic cohesion, not merely formal delegation from masses to leaders
- Reproduction serves an economic function at both societal and family scales
- Reproduction’s economic function operates molecularly within families as units
- Resistance to social change comes from culturally invested groups facing obsolescence
- Revolution imposed from outside fails without support from the local population.
- Revolution requires an organized vanguard party that forms before the crisis peaks
- Revolutionaries under defeat must endure long patient degradation rather than choose heroic death
- Revolutionary clubs were media-centred assemblies held together by a newspaper’s clientele
- Revolutionary consciousness among masses outran organized revolutionary capacity nationwide.
- Revolutionary consciousness requires a precise concept of the State
- Revolutionary councils must represent the whole class, not just organized party members.
- Revolutionary crowds massacred 1200 royalist prisoners blamed for military defeats
- Revolutionary French clubs combined public assemblies with newspapers and inner circles
- Revolutionary leadership must flow upward from class awareness, not downward.
- Revolutionary mass parties can fail insurrection by neglecting alliances with peasants
- Revolutionary movements fail when foreign allies restrain land reform that could win rural support
- Revolutionary parties can be verbally maximalist while unprepared to act
- Revolutionary parties split over whether national conditions or international revolution determine their fate.
- Revolutionary periods produce materialist popular culture while elites cling to spiritualism
- Revolutionary phases produce popular materialism while traditional classes favor philosophies of spirit
- Revolutionary politics requires active intervention in history rather than correct waiting.
- Revolutionary problems transcend national boundaries and require international coordination
- Revolutionary regimes fuse state and civil society to hold national life.
- Revolutionary renewal depends on a country’s internal and international force relations
- Revolutionary rhetoric can galvanize mass imagination without any concrete preparation
- Revolutionary rhetoric can mask active counterrevolutionary alliances
- Revolutionary rhetoric outpaced concrete organizational preparation among socialist leaders.
- Revolutionary strategy shifted from war of movement to war of position after 1870
- Revolutionary strategy unites the moments of force and consent dialectically.
- Revolutionary theory is judged by analyzing internal forces, not predicting dates.
- Revolutionary theory raises the masses culturally while the Church maintains only mechanical unity
- Revolutionary timing is unpredictable, so strategy must hold two perspectives at once.
- Rhetorical action collapses when external support is withdrawn
- Risk-prone expansion drives state intervention beyond mere apparatus preservation
- Rival externally-backed ruling class factions tore Greece apart in 1920
- Rival nationalist bands fought each other while jointly fighting imperial rule
- Robinson Crusoe-style reasoning falsely derives society from an isolated individual
- Rotary Clubs are Freemasonry without petit-bourgeois participants.
- Rough beginnings of a new era surpass an old era’s refined end
- Ruling classes absorb and neutralize subversive movements through transformism
- Ruling classes build parallel private military forces positioned on class frontiers
- Ruling classes can maintain permanent armed forces that work-bound classes cannot match
- Ruling classes mobilize their full reserves before revolutionaries reach power.
- Ruling classes pacify the masses by declaring the promised future already achieved.
- Ruling classes reabsorb slipping control faster than subordinates reorganize
- Ruling-class philosophy subordinates masses without positively transforming their thought
- Ruling-class political blunders are possible and get corrected through successive crises
- Ruling-class unity is forged through the organic ties between State and civil society
- Ruling-class unity rhetoric signals its vulnerability to pressure
- Ruling-class women’s leisure functions as evidence of capitalist social decay
- Rural conflicts turn acute and personal because economic margins are absent
- Rural intellectuals remain traditional, unintegrated into capitalism
- Rural traditional intellectuals mediate peasants and state administration
- Russian Marxists split over whether revolution would yield workers’ or joint-class rule.
- Russian revolutionary factions split over whether a workers’ or cross-class democracy should govern
- Sabotaged resistance crushed proletarian morale so completely that later calls for action failed
- Sartre’s Critique reworked Marxist economism into praxis-language for a new era of revolutionary ferment
- Saussurean linguistics treats langue as code and langage as the messages it generates
- Schematic educational abstractions are actively absorbed and productive
- School and Church dominate institutional cultural production
- School instills state-centered worldview to displace folkloristic traditional conceptions
- School-to-university transition is a rupture, not a graduated passage
- Schooling first levels into dynamic conformism then expands autonomous personality
- Schools serve as the machinery that manufactures differentiated intellectual strata
- Science and action are distinct yet inseparable phases of revolutionary theory.
- Science as creation is political unless it rationally enlarges life
- Science had to destroy traditional good sense to create a new one
- Science is political activity because it transforms what men are
- Scientific advance is driven by intellectual, political, and methodological instruments, not material ones.
- Scientific discovery inescapably implies a transcendent unknown that ties science to politics
- Scientific experiment is the historical origin of united theory and practice
- Scientific management pioneers openly dehumanized manual laborers as interchangeable with animals
- Scientific management reduced the laborer to a beast of burden to be trained.
- Scientific method cannot be transferred wholesale across research fields
- Scientific progress advances mainly through intellectual and political instruments, not material ones
- Scientific progress required expelling religious and classical textual authority
- Scientific theories are superstructures explained by history, not causes of it.
- Scientific theories are superstructures to be explained by society, not causes of it
- Secret conspiracy organizations flourished under the French Restoration from 1815 to 1830
- Secular philosophies failed to construct their own education for children
- Self-criticism becomes performative ritual rather than operative change
- Self-criticism functioned as a disciplinary ritual inside communist parties, not only fascist ones.
- Self-discipline can be externalized by physically constraining oneself
- Self-disciplined, freedom-granting educational systems breed procrastination and teacher overload
- Self-government requires a rentier class with traditional public-affairs experience and mass prestige
- Self-government succeeds where the landed class never fought its population
- Self-sufficient smallholders establish no social bond, only spatial similarity
- Self-understanding is achieved through struggle between opposing hegemonies
- Semantic history is an aspect of cultural history.
- Separate Moderate and Action Party leaderships combined mechanically to unite Italy
- Separating philosophy from history and politics reduces it to metaphysics
- Separation of powers doctrine originated from Montesquieu’s reading of England and shaped modern constitutions
- Serbia failed as a Balkan Piedmont because peasantry became politically awake after 1919
- Severe ideological rifts cannot be cured by pure force, only rearranged
- Sexual ethics reform requires women’s genuine independence and new self-conception first.
- Short-term market conjunctures govern tactics, while durable situations govern strategy.
- Sicilian peasant leagues demanded land redistribution and were brutally crushed
- Sicilian peasant leagues won contract improvements but were brutally crushed when crisis triggered revolt
- Sicilian peasant leagues won land reform then were brutally repressed
- Single-party states displace politics into culture where disputes become insoluble
- Skilled labour monopolies limit unemployment’s wage-depressing effect
- Skilled labour organicity limits competitive wage discipline.
- Slow incremental corporatist reform can transform social structure without violent shocks
- Slow methodical doctrinal change keeps religious unity while satisfying intellectual demands
- So-called anti-individualist critics target wealth appropriation while production is already socialized
- Social being determines consciousness, not the reverse
- Social change unfolds across escalating levels of relations of force
- Social conformism is permanent; what changes is which conformism wins hegemony.
- Social Democracy treated intellectuals as bourgeois refugees supplying theory to workers
- Social democracy was theorized as a bourgeois instrument continuous with fascism.
- Social Democratic analysts diagnosed European fascism’s spread as early as 1928
- Social formations persist while productive forces retain room to advance
- Social norms constitute the subject rather than merely constraining her
- Social orders collapse only after their productive forces are exhausted
- Social orders only die after their productive forces have fully developed
- Social orders persist until their productive forces are fully developed
- Social prediction follows will-driven programs, not natural-science laws.
- Social transformation meets resistance from both subaltern and allied dominant sectors
- Social wholes exceed their components, so social law cannot be physical law
- Socialist relations cannot incubate within capitalism as capitalism did within feudalism.
- Societies only pose problems they can solve, and orders die only when superseded.
- Societies only rise or fall when material conditions make it possible
- Societies only undertake tasks whose material conditions are maturing
- Society exceeds its individual parts through collective labor and division of functions
- Society, through the division of labour, produces more than the sum of its parts.
- Society’s development cannot be explained by physical laws of quantity.
- Society’s laws cannot be physical laws because social aggregates transform quantitatively into quality
- Sociological laws are tautologies duplicating observed facts rather than real causes
- Sociologists may have outpaced political scientists in voting-behavior research
- Sociology attempts an exact positivist science of social facts
- Sociology derives from vulgar evolutionism and cannot grasp the dialectical principle
- Sociology emerged as political science declined under positivist theories
- Sociology is a positivist science of social facts, a philosophy in embryo
- Sole reliance on the working class distinguished the liberal antifascist position from Marxism
- Some Bordiga followers believed certain leaders stood above party discipline
- Some dogmatism in basic instruction is practically indispensable
- Sorel anticipated philosophy of praxis as a popular reformation but remained an elitist.
- Sorel stopped at the trade union and never reached the political party
- Southern autonomy campaigns voiced latent popular sentiment suppressed by unitarianism
- Southern Italian ideology was shaped by land hunger, emigration suffering, and settler colonialism.
- Southern Italian rentier ownership extracts surplus from a malnourished peasantry
- Southern Italy’s union with the North was framed as a revocable contract
- Southern urban forces derived strength from representing Northern urban prestige
- Soviet labour militarisation failed against Trade Union opposition after the Civil War
- Spanish colonial rule fossilized clergy and military as Latin America’s traditional intellectuals.
- Spatial categories like East and West are real yet historically constructed, not natural.
- Specialized philosophical jargon widens the divide between high culture and the popular masses.
- Spirit is a historical result of superstructure unification, not a starting point
- Spirit is an achievement of unification, not a starting point
- Splitting praxis into sociology and metaphysics erases the dialectic.
- Spoken questions are answered through shared tacit frames, not literal content
- Spontaneity marks subaltern classes that lack class-for-itself consciousness
- Spontaneous attraction to liberal ideology destabilized the Papacy in Italy.
- Spontaneous insurrection outpaced organized socialist leadership in Turin 1917
- Spontaneous mass uprising and elite conspiracy combined in the Sicilian Vespers
- Spontaneous mass uprising without organized revolutionary leadership invites state suppression
- Spontaneous mass working-class revolt drives previously apolitical middle strata toward reaction.
- Spontaneous subaltern movements usually enable regressive rather than progressive outcomes
- Spontaneous Turin insurrection lacked effective socialist organization and fell in four days.
- Spontaneous worker struggle produces only trade-union consciousness, never socialist theory.
- Stalin and Bukharin barred Comintern discussion of the Russian succession struggle
- Stalin identified two liquidationist dangers and a nationalist one in the Russian Party
- Starting a national history after its revolution silently erases the struggle that formed it
- State coercive power stands ready for moments when spontaneous consent fails
- State connivance drove fascism’s rise from marginal to mass scale
- State financial policy can eliminate rentier classes as a precondition of industrialisation
- State grants of citizenship created Rome’s imperial intellectual bureaucracy
- State intervention must extend from preserving to reorganizing the productive apparatus.
- State investment intermediation arises as savers flee private risk.
- State language unification fails to erase regional mother tongues
- State offers of co-partnership bait reformist labor leaders into ending occupations.
- State pensions enabled retirement in the forties while workers toiled past sixty-five
- State power always rests on the doubled forces of force and consent.
- State prestige can substitute for a class’s missing intellectual and moral authority
- State spirit means acting in solidarity with past and future generations
- State-led reform and national wars dominate the formation of modern states
- States claim belated basic improvements as merit and prestige
- States use law to shape a specific type of citizen and civilization
- Statesmen often exaggerate international constraints for party reasons rather than national ones
- Statistical laws apply to politics only while masses remain passive
- Statistical laws in politics presuppose mass passivity (actual or presumed).
- Statolatry must be criticised so civil society becomes self-governing and spontaneous
- Strategic preparation can let quantitatively inferior forces defeat stronger enemies
- Strategic preparation neutralizes unplanned reactions of passive populations
- Structure and superstructure form a unified historical bloc.
- Structure-superstructure relations must be posed precisely for historical analysis.
- Student self-directed scheduling causes work to cluster at month’s end, undermining educational seriousness
- Study is a physically and mentally tiring apprenticeship
- Studying a worldview’s origin requires philological reconstruction and identifying discarded provisional elements.
- Studying an unsystematized worldview requires philological reconstruction of its stable core
- Studying collective will requires tracing its formation, not its effects
- Subaltern classes lack unity until they achieve statehood, hence history of subalternity
- Subaltern forces resist rationalization intended to serve dominant interests.
- Subaltern groups lack state power and cannot exercise hegemony over society
- Subaltern history must be studied through six ascending formation phases
- Subaltern history traces development toward full autonomy
- Subaltern movements contain conscious leadership without a dominant, stratum-transcending element
- Subaltern transition from passive thing to active historical protagonist changes their responsibility
- Subjugated peoples cannot wait on the hegemon’s permission to organize militarily
- Subordinate classes gain self-awareness only by negation of the enemy
- Successful insurrection must prevent the expelled power from staging a counter-offensive.
- Successful insurrection requires lengthy ideological preparation beforehand
- Successful popular revolution requires long prior ideological preparation, not just armed insurrection
- Suffering obscured from view is as necessary to history as heroic action.
- Supremacy requires both domination and intellectual-moral leadership
- Sustained scepticism is self-contradictory because participation in debate assumes conviction
- Syndicalist gradualism assumes economic gains can outlast capitalist state power
- Tacit forms of parliamentarism persist where explicit ones are abolished
- Tactics must remain flexible while preserving an unchanging revolutionary identity.
- Taylorism deliberately breaks up skilled workers’ psycho-physical nexus
- Taylorized management treats the workforce as a single fragile machine
- Teachers must consciously impose their culture against pupils’ home culture
- Technical civilisation’s new hero is restrained mastery, not liberation
- Technique includes mental and philosophical instruments, not just industrial science
- Terminology confusion reveals an anti-dialectical, dogmatic cast of mind
- Territorial dispersal blocks a landed stratum from political centralization
- Territorial dispersal leaves landed strata ideologically volatile and slow to organize
- Textbook dogmatism is impossible for doctrines still in development
- The ‘German proletariat as heir of classical philosophy’ claim originates with Engels, not Marx
- The ‘materialist’ label largely misrepresents the actual founding of Marx’s philosophy
- The ‘nightwatchman’ expression for the liberal State was coined by Lassalle.
- The 1917 events marked a turning point in political science.
- The 1917 intransigent faction rejected the bourgeois conception of the nation
- The 1917 October Revolution taught Italian socialists two distinct lessons
- The 1920 factory occupations were a defensive employer-imposed confrontation
- The 1923 Gentile reform was the first major Italian education overhaul since unification.
- The Action Party failed because it had no organic government programme for the peasantry.
- The Action Party substituted a principled abstraction for a concrete political terrain
- The actualist State-as-superior-entity theory reduces individuals to abstractions
- The Albertine Statute established Piedmont’s constitutional monarchy and later governed unified Italy
- The American ruling class historically shared a vocation of work with workers
- The Bank of Naples came to control Il Mattino in 1928.
- The Bolshevik revolution was greeted by some Marxists as refuting deterministic Marxism
- The Bourbon repression destroyed the last consensual foundation of Neapolitan rule.
- The Calvinist doctrine of predestination paradoxically unleashed expansive individual initiative.
- The Catholic Church condemned Modernism in 1907 for engaging modern science and sociology
- The Catholic church maintained ideological unity by keeping intellectuals and masses doctrinally joined
- The Catholic church monopolized cultural direction with penal sanctions
- The Centre captured ninety percent of the Italian party in eighteen months
- The Centre faction consolidated control by absorbing rivals over several years
- The Church absorbed heretical challenges by co-opting individual intellectuals, not popular movements
- The Church healed elite-mass splits through reabsorbed popular movements.
- The Church inherited Rome’s monopoly over cultural direction with penal enforcement.
- The Church opposed infant schooling for its liberal ideology and clerical-monopoly threat
- The Comintern adopted a dual perspective allowing either revolution or labourism.
- The Comintern rejected offensive theory in favor of winning mass support
- The Comintern’s 1924 left turn stemmed from Soviet inner-party battles, not European events.
- The Comintern’s dual perspective allowed for both slow and imminent revolution
- The Comintern’s united front aimed to win a working-class majority
- The Comintern’s united front policy sought working-class majority through common action with reformists
- The Communist Party’s 1930 left turn destroyed its leadership and underground network
- The concept of charisma originated with Rudolf Sohm, not Max Weber
- The concept of praxis travelled into a protofascist philosophy of the pure act
- The crisis of progress is a crisis of its standard bearers, not the idea
- The defeated 1922 general strike crushed proletarian morale before Mussolini’s march.
- The dialectic only functions when philosophy of praxis stands as an integral philosophy.
- The Dreyfus affair demonstrates intra-bloc resistance to reactionary Caesarism
- The early PCI leadership treated fascism as secondary to the social-democratic threat
- The East-West distinction reflects European cultural hegemony accepted worldwide.
- The ethical State concept was borrowed by fascism from Croce
- The ethical State is the State that claims to educate citizens morally.
- The exploited South generated its own reaction against northern extraction
- The falling rate of profit forces capitalists to intensify labor exploitation
- The fascist regime isolated Gramsci through chained transfers and planted agents
- The fascist regime staged Gramsci’s trial as exemplary political punishment
- The French Enlightenment was a popular reformation that grounded the nation
- The French Enlightenment was a popular secular reformation embracing the peasant masses
- The French republic’s supposed alliance with struggling peoples was actually alliance with counterrevolution.
- The future is unknowable by definition, so prediction is only practical action.
- The gap between elite and popular beliefs varies systematically across religious traditions
- The historical bloc unifies structure and superstructure as a circle of distincts
- The human is a historical point of arrival, not a given starting point.
- The hundred cities term names a class-split urban pattern in latifundia zones
- The idea of endless ethical progress is unjustifiable because improvement is individual
- The idea of extra-human objectivity is a leftover of the concept of God
- The idea of God derives from our need for an absolute unobserved observer
- The idea of progress was born when society gained rational control over nature
- The infant PCI was a mostly working-class party with a tiny intellectual layer
- The intellectual category is a class myth; intellectuals divide into traditional and organic
- The Italian Communist leadership gravely underestimated fascism’s significance for years
- The Italian Communist Party clashed with the Comintern long before the united front policy
- The Italian Communist Party endured semi-legality with constant suppression in 1923.
- The Italian Communist Party formed only after revolutionary mass struggle had already been defeated.
- The Italian Communist Party formed only after the revolutionary wave collapsed
- The Italian communist party remained small during the 1924 elections
- The Italian Communist Party was overwhelmingly working-class with almost no intellectual membership
- The Italian Communist Party was tiny relative to the masses it aimed to lead
- The Italian left never resolved the party-union relation before the factory occupations.
- The Italian term sindacalismo conflates syndicalism and trade-unionism, shaping Gramsci’s category.
- The Jacobin Supreme Being cult was the first root of the modern lay State.
- The Jacobins created the modern French nation by winning rural hegemony.
- The Jacobins represented future needs of groups not yet fully part of the nation
- The label lazzaronismo encoded ruling-class contempt for Naples’ sub-proletariat
- The latent dream is a fantasy-satisfaction, not merely a disguised desire
- The Left faction dominated the PCI apparatus despite refusing leadership posts
- The Lombard aristocracy still oriented its deference toward Austrian rule
- The masses hold a contradictory consciousness that can produce political passivity
- The meaning of ‘middle class’ varies by national political history
- The meaning of social class terms shifts with each nation’s history
- The mere promise of passive revolution manufactures hope that reinforces ruling-class hegemony.
- The minimal night-watchman state may be the only conception transcending economic-corporate consciousness
- The minimal State alone may transcend merely economic-corporate politics.
- The modern prince is the political party, not a person.
- The modern Prince must organise both moral reform and collective will
- The monitorial school diffused authority and obedience throughout the whole body without loss
- The national-popular is a cultural historic bloc between mass and national aspirations, not populism
- The national-popular is a cultural historic bloc mediated by intellectuals, not populism
- The objective level of productive forces grounds which ideologies are practicable in a society
- The October Revolution taught militants party discipline while masses learned Soviet power
- The old humanistic school formed character by absorbing the entire cultural past
- The Ordine Nuovo factory council group disintegrated politically by mid-1920
- The original meaning of ideology was the science of how ideas derive from sensations
- The overall balance of forces imposes the form of war
- The party Centre hostility toward the reformist Right matched its hostility to the Left
- The party deadlock drove Gramsci toward a new centre majority
- The party functions as the proletariat’s organic intellectuals
- The PCI was founded by split from the socialists at Livorno
- The PCI’s founding policy treated fascism as secondary to social democracy within bourgeois rule
- The philosophy of praxis alone offers a consistently immanentist worldview
- The philosophy of praxis began as scattered aphorisms encoding a full worldview
- The philosophy of praxis needs practical research canons, not just theoretical doctrine
- The philosophy of praxis originates as materialism perfected by and fused with humanism.
- The phrase ‘historic mission’ has teleological origins
- The political moment must always prevail over the military in strategy
- The political party, not an individual, is the modern protagonist of political transformation
- The political-animal doctrine has deep Italian philosophical roots
- The Popular Party founded in 1919 re-emerged after fascism as Christian Democracy
- The post-1918 order parallels the post-Napoleonic era as a passive revolution
- The present realizes what was essential in the past
- The Prince substitutes for divinity and the categorical imperative
- The Prince synthesized foreign statecraft Italy lacked the forces to enact
- The Prison Notebooks comprise thirty-three fragmented, partially revised notebooks.
- The prison notebooks were a deliberate strategy against political self-abandonment
- The professional philosopher differs by knowing thought’s entire history
- The PSI’s abstentionist wartime policy opened the social space later filled by fascism.
- The PSI’s anti-resistance stance helped disarm the left before fascism.
- The PSI’s non-resistance posture led it to sign a pacification pact with fascists
- The PSI’s revolutionary rhetoric masked an absence of concrete revolutionary preparation
- The revolutionary-democratic dictatorship slogan resurfaced in later debates over Poland and China
- The rights declarations replaced historical rights with rights deduced from human nature.
- The Risorgimento proved Neo-Guelph papal federation illusory
- The Roman Republic and Venice resisted Austrian forces for months after Piedmont’s defeat.
- The ruler-ruled division reproduces inside every group, including homogeneous ones
- The rural poor split into day-labourers and property-owning smallholders with opposed interests
- The Russian proletariat invented the State of the Councils from its own class experience.
- The Russian Revolution’s example galvanized Turin workers to insurrectionary action.
- The same avant-garde movement can play opposite political roles in different countries
- The science of instruments is historically tied to production and technology
- The scope of political analysis determines whether change seems possible
- The shift from frontal attack to positional war is postwar political theory’s central problem
- The short-lived Roman Republic fell to French siege in 1849.
- The Spanish pejorative lazzaronismo labeled Naples’ urban poor monarchist and lazy
- The state actively educates and organizes the consent it governs by
- The state educates populations by shaping customs beyond formal legal sanction.
- The State evolves from government to nightwatchman to regulated society
- The State includes private hegemonic apparatuses, not just government
- The state includes the private apparatus of hegemony beyond government
- The State is an equilibrium between coercive political society and hegemonic civil society
- The state is an equilibrium of coercion and consent run through civil society
- The State is defined by ruling-class activity that secures the consent of the ruled
- The State is domination plus the active consent of the ruled
- The state lacks a unitary worldview, scattering intellectuals across strata
- The state must act as an educator, not merely a punisher of danger
- The state operates as both civil and political society
- The State-led dominant group blocks reform in regions it only holds by domination
- The state’s coercive arm withers as civil society expands within it.
- The state’s connivance and elite funding transformed fascism from marginal to mass.
- The State’s dominant group presents its interests as universal rather than corporate.
- The state’s educative aim is shaping new types of humanity fit for production
- The strategy of permanent revolution lost efficacy after 1870-71.
- The subjectivist conception only gains truth when reinterpreted through the concept of superstructures.
- The Supercountry-Supercity literary polemic masked deeper class conflict
- The technical hero embodies disciplined study rather than liberation
- The term ‘ideology’ conflates necessary superstructure with arbitrary individual fancies
- The term sciences once meant any organized branch of human knowledge.
- The theory-practice unity question runs through every philosophy of history.
- The totalitarian party absorbs the Crown’s arbitration function and poses as impartial State
- The true philosopher is the active political actor who transforms social relations.
- The Turin strike failed from lack of national coordination, not from state force.
- The united front aimed to win workers over by engaging reformist leaders
- The united front from below contradicted the tactic’s premise of winning the working-class majority
- The united front tactic presumed gaining majority working-class support precedes revolution
- The united front tactic sought working-class majority through engaging reformists
- The United States remains stuck in an economic-corporate phase lacking cultural hegemony
- The Vatican sponsored outward-facing political parties rather than internal Church reform
- The vote only measures the persuasive power of active minorities, not equal individual opinions
- The word quality in production means labour-heavy luxury specialization
- The word science narrowed its meaning after the industrial revolution
- The world’s unity is material and shown through accumulated inquiry
- Theorists can borrow rival concepts and redefine them within their own framework.
- Theory and practice unite through a critical act that accelerates historical transformation.
- Theory develops unevenly, paced by practical necessities rather than its own logic
- Theory must translate reality rather than force reality into abstract schemas.
- Theory of history is possible despite the uniqueness of historical facts
- Theory-practice unity develops historically from an instinctive sense of difference
- This selection is incomplete because the paragraph was truncated in the source.
- Thought is proper to every person, unlike specialized scientific skills.
- Thought requires active engagement with a modifying cultural environment to be real
- Tolstoy took the subjectivist conception of reality to literal physical experiment.
- Total labour mobilization requires unions to become organs of coercion over workers.
- Totalitarian parties absorb the Crown’s arbitrating function.
- Totalitarian regimes replace external opposition with enforced internal self-surveillance.
- Tracing a thinker’s sources can wrongly deny their originality
- Tracing how Marxism got absorbed into other philosophies requires delicate analysis of hidden connections.
- Traditional intellectuals can retain political dominance through an independent economic base
- Traditional intellectuals trace their origins to slavery and freedmen in the Roman Empire.
- Transforming concrete political questions into abstract principles guarantees political failure.
- Transformism absorbed opposition elites into the ruling bloc
- Transformism operates by absorbing individuals first, then entire opposition groups
- Transformism organically absorbed revolutionary personnel into the Italian ruling class
- Trasformismo is a historical form of passive revolution
- Treating a research principle as a historical cause explains nothing.
- Treating certain expressions as inherently beautiful is a philosophical error.
- Treating social quality as an entity is an arbitrary hypostasis in idealism and religion
- Treating society as naturally evolutionary impoverished the concept of the State
- Treating statistical laws as necessary in politics leads to catastrophic practical errors
- Treating technical instruments as the base generates absurd structure-superstructure category confusions
- Trotsky argued a harder conquest yields a safer post-revolutionary state
- Trotsky framed state labour control as union-enforced military discipline
- Trotsky held that a harder revolutionary struggle yields firmer post-victory power
- Trotsky opposed the revolutionary offensive in both military and political spheres
- Trotsky’s dismissal of Labriola reflected German intellectual influence
- Trotsky’s Eastern-Western front comparison lacked practical directives.
- Trotsky’s permanent revolution theory broke from both Menshevik and Bolshevik positions
- Trotsky’s program to industrialize through external coercion was destined to end in Bonapartism
- True democracy requires that every citizen can potentially govern
- True political representation requires organic cohesion between rulers and ruled
- Truth for critical theory is historically conditioned, not timeless.
- Turin professors first connected Gramsci to socialist thought.
- Turin’s August 1917 uprising cost fifty lives and a thousand arrests.
- Turin’s militant proletariat proved a natural class ally for Southern peasants
- Turin’s strikes convinced Gramsci workers could ally with southern peasants
- Turin’s strikes escalated from economic to political insurrection by 1917
- Turin’s textile women workers led the 1917 wave of industrial struggles
- Turin’s wartime industrialization transformed it into Europe’s leading FIAT production center
- Two distinct leaderships collaborating mechanically produced Italian unification’s success
- Typologies reduce analytic effort and predictive uncertainty about political actors.
- Uncritical worldviews are mechanically imposed by one’s social environment
- Uncritical worldviews make a single personality a composite of many historical layers
- Under dictatorship insurrection becomes the only channel for mass political expression.
- Understanding party leadership change requires internal history, not just external pressure
- Unintended consequences of private passion can form durable social institutions
- Union-party coordination operates through freely chosen leadership, not formal subordination
- Unique historical facts can still support a theory of history and politics
- Units of economics, philosophy, and politics each center on a man-nature contradiction
- Universal education requires the state to replace family, making formation public
- Universal moral maxims serve a cosmopolitan intellectual stratum’s civilizing project
- Universal techniques exist only as incarnated in concrete individual acts
- Universal truths are effective only when expressed in concrete situations’ language.
- University study methods grant students freedom at the cost of personal connection to teachers
- Unknown primary texts require unemended editions because editors distort authorial intent
- Unknown reality is a relative historical condition, not a metaphysical unknowable
- Unled spontaneous revolts invite reactionary counter-movements and coups
- Unorganized metalworkers outmilitated a collaborationist union leadership
- Upper-class nonconformity to work ethics blocks disciplining the masses.
- Urban and rural population types are not homogeneous or schematically opposed
- Urban-rural relations drive the fundamental motor forces of national history
- Urbanist and ruralist cultural movements were two faces of fascist imperialism
- Urbanites unite ideologically against the peasantry across class lines
- US Prohibition failed due to resistance from marginal backward forces
- US unions defended craft privilege rather than posing the hegemonic question.
- Using a lingua franca does not erode the speakers’ own cultural identity
- Using outmoded thought for present problems makes one a walking anachronism
- Vague ideological slogans can mask rather than resolve real political contradictions
- Valid literary judgment requires knowing the work’s historical context
- Vico distinguished empirical certainty from rational truth in law
- Vico distinguished the merely certain from the rationally true in law.
- Vico held that providence converts private passions into civil institutions behind men’s backs
- Violently interrupting the institutional repetition of a worldview can destroy it
- Vocational schooling advocated as democratic actually crystallises class differences
- Voluntarism degenerates into false heroism when detached from organic social blocs.
- Volunteer paramilitary squads against fascism emerged outside official left parties.
- Volunteer squads alone could not match fascist violence backed by the state
- Volunteer squads could not defeat fascism because the state backed it.
- Volunteer vanguard action masks rather than replaces mass political passivity
- Vote oscillation across election levels reveals a party’s cadre deficiencies.
- Wage-ceiling law alienated workers from the Jacobins
- War is the continuation of policy that demands permanent political organization.
- War of position analysis does not apply to colonies and backward states
- War of position replaced war of movement as politics after the 1921 setback
- War of position replaced war of movement in modern democratic politics
- War of position requires unprecedented concentration of hegemony and interventionist government
- War of position suits stable equilibrium when frontal attack is impossible
- War service gave officers-intellectuals leadership detaching peasants from landowner blocs
- War-time hegemony can be lost to subordinates at the peace table
- Wars against multi-ethnic empires should aim at internal dissolution, not territorial conquest
- Wartime sexual coercion created a postwar moral crisis driven by demographic imbalance
- Weak local forces can succeed when international conditions favor them
- Weak parties produce cultural squalor and apolitical elites
- Weak parties yield a bureaucracy that becomes a political party in its own right
- Western communist parties read the post-1921 revolutionary ebb as temporary
- Western states rest on strong civil society while Russia’s state stood alone
- What appears objective social necessity is only a transitory phase of class rule
- What matters politically is that passive revolution generates hope enough to reinforce hegemony.
- Widely sincerely-held revolutionary slogans can still be historically concrete
- Widening intellectual training to new classes faces unprecedented adaptive difficulties
- Willed self-correction can be carried out in bad faith, working and refusing simultaneously
- Without coercion, virtue becomes hypocritical and crisis turns permanent
- Without false belief in totality no one would act to create history
- Women comprised forty percent of Turin’s industrial working class
- Words shift meaning across historical periods and individual authors
- Work discipline internalized by the worker beats external imposition
- Workers championed industrial modernity before industrialists co-opted the movement
- Workplace puritanism protects workers from physiological collapse under rationalized labor
- World War I disintegrated ruling hegemony apparatuses across all states
- World War I enormously strengthened and concentrated Italian industrial capital
- Worldviews require permanent organized repetition or they decay
- Writing the history of absorbed concepts means writing the full history of modern culture
- Yet the notebooks must be read whole to resist partisan interpretation of Gramsci