No systematic research attributes the original philosophy of praxis thought
Evidence
Apart from the question raised by Sorel, it would seem that for the very reason that (apparently) it is asserted that the second of the two friends has scant capacities as a theoretician (or at least occupies a subaltern position in relation to the first), it is indispensable to study who is responsible for the original thought. In reality, apart from Mondolfo’s book, no systematic research of this type has been undertaken in the world of culture. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1374
Related
- Philosophy of praxis must be understood as historical methodology. (similarity 0.84)
- A thinker’s sources cannot explain the originality of their thought (similarity 0.82)
- A philosophy’s intellectual sources do not constitute its essential content (similarity 0.81)
- Studying a worldview’s origin requires philological reconstruction and identifying discarded provisional elements. (similarity 0.81)
- Mass philosophy must start from common sense and take polemical form (similarity 0.80)
- A new philosophy is defined by transforming how philosophy itself is conceived (similarity 0.80)
- Gramsci’s philosophy of praxis links theory inseparably to practice and action (similarity 0.80)
- The philosophy of praxis began as scattered aphorisms encoding a full worldview (similarity 0.80)
- Reducing a philosophy to a systematic sociology is naive metaphysics. (similarity 0.80)
- This selection is incomplete because the paragraph was truncated in the source. (similarity 0.80)
- Every prior philosophy expressed social contradictions without consciously knowing them (similarity 0.79)
- The philosophy of praxis needs practical research canons, not just theoretical doctrine (similarity 0.79)
- A philosophy of praxis begins by criticizing common sense while building on it (similarity 0.79)
- Labriola originated the philosophy of praxis as the unity of theory and practice. (similarity 0.79)
- Gramsci’s political divergence from Bordiga centered on the theory-practice relation. (similarity 0.79)