Subordinate classes gain self-awareness only by negation of the enemy

Evidence

This “generic” hatred is still “semi-feudal” rather than modern in character, and cannot be taken as evidence of class consciousness—merely as the first glimmer of such consciousness, in other words, merely as the basic negative, polemical attitude. Not only does the people have no precise consciousness of its own historical identity, it is not even conscious of the historical identity or the exact limits of its adversary. The lower classes, historically on the defensive, can only achieve self-awareness via a series of negations, via their consciousness of the identity and class limits of their enemy; but it is precisely this process which has not yet come to the surface, at least not nationally. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1012

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines negative class consciousness as opposed to positive — a foundational distinction in Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and subaltern consciousness.
  • XREF: This is the classic formulation the reader needs before encountering how Orientalist discourse constructs ‘the Other’ — the colonized/subaltern subject defined negatively against the colonizer. — connects to: The friend-enemy distinction dissolves only through mutual recognition within shared space; Classes-in-themselves become forces-for-themselves through conscious organization.; Self-certainty requires recognition from the other (+4 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that subaltern self-awareness is built through ‘a series of negations’ — knowledge of the enemy’s limits rather than one’s own identity — is dense and carries far beyond Italian peasant politics.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1012

Broader Connections