Premature systematization produces only illusory coherence in a doctrine

Evidence

A philosophy which is not self-consistent cannot be wholly true, but a philosophy which is self-consistent can very well be wholly false. The most fruitful philosophies have contained glaring inconsistencies, but for that very reason have been partially true. There is no reason to suppose that a self-consistent system contains more truth than one which, like Locke’s, is obviously more or less wrong. — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2213 (#expands, via linked claim)

Since life is the antithesis of form, and since that which is somehow formed can be conceptually described, the concept of life cannot be freed from logical imprecision. The essence of life would be denied if one tried to form an exhaustive conceptual definition. In order for conscious life to be fully self-conscious, it would have to do without concepts altogether, for conceptualization inevitably brings on the reign of forms; yet concepts are essential to self-consciousness. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 1018 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: A self-consistent philosophy can be completely false while inconsistent systems hold truth — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2213; Conceptualization inevitably imposes form on formless life — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 1018; Excessive theorizing can empty power of its material exercise

Broader Connections