Marx distinguishes material economic transformation from ideological forms of consciousness

Evidence

Marx’s “materialism” adds to this premise at least one other requirement: that the relationship must be thought within determinate historical conditions. It must be made historically specific . It is this second requirement which distinguishes a historical materialist theory of human society and culture from, say, a materialism grounded in the simple fact of man’s physical nature (a “vulgar,” or as Marx calls it, an undialectical materialism) or one which gives the determining instance to technological development alone. What Karl Korsch, among others, has called “the principle of historical specificity” in Marx’s materialism is clearly enunciated in The German Ideology (where Marx’s theory becomes, for the first time, fully “historical”) and afterward in his mature work. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 881 (#expands, via linked claim)

Gramsci’s work has recently been taken up and developed in a structuralist manner—especially in Althusser’s essay on “Ideological State Apparatuses” (Althusser 1971). This seminal essay differs from Gramsci’s work, specifically, in posing the problem in terms of “reproduction.” But the concerns which underlie this approach are not all that distant from those of Gramsci. The economic relations of production must themselves be “reproduced.” This reproduction is not simply economic, but social, technical, and, above all, ideological. This is another way of putting Gramsci’s observation that, to achieve its full development, capitalist social relations require to be coupled with an elaborate development and elaboration at the “non-economic” levels of politics, civil society, and culture, through moral, intellectual, and ideological leadership. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 628 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Historical specificity distinguishes Marx’s materialism from vulgar or technological determinism — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 881; Marxism is not economic reductionism and requires attending to ideas in their own terms; Economic change does not directly supply the content of capitalist ideas (+8 more)

Broader Connections