International relations logically follow domestic social-structural changes
Evidence
Yet from the sociological viewpoint, we are interested only in such questions as: How do the various phases of super-ordination and subordination follow one another? To what extent is superordination in a given relation compatible with co-ordination in other relations? How much superordination is required in the initial phase of the relation to destroy co-ordination completely? — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 208 (
#contradicts, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: National historical variations depend partly on international relations; Hegemonic apparatus reconstruction varies with each state’s social relations; Social relations can be analyzed purely as formal configurations — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 208 (+1 more)
Related
- National historical variations depend partly on international relations (similarity 0.82)
- Social relations can be analyzed purely as formal configurations (similarity 0.81)
Broader Connections
- Hegemonic apparatus reconstruction varies with each state’s social relations
#exemplifies(0.78) - Social relations can be analyzed purely as formal configurations
#contradicts(0.75) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 208 - The meaning of social class terms shifts with each nation’s history
#exemplifies(0.72)