Gramsci borrowed non-Marxist concepts while redefining them within Marxist discourse

Evidence

The conceptual vocabulary here is drawn in part from Bergson, introduced in order to fill a gap felt by Gramsci to exist ‘in traditional Marxist theories of social and individual praxis. More than anything else it is these importations from non-Marxist philosophies that have caused Gramsci to be taxed with idealism by more “orthodox” Marxists. It should, however, be noted that in an earlier passage Gramsci defines “will” in a very non-Bergsonian sense as equalling, in the last analysis, practical or political activity, and in general he does not hesitate consciously to use words from an earlier philosophical tradition while endowing them with a new content determined by their context within a Marxist discourse. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 2538

Categorization

Category: Craft and Method

  • XREF: This vocabulary-importing-and-redefining practice is the same move Islamophobia theory later makes with Foucault, Arendt, and others — the reader’s toolkit should note Gramsci as early model of ‘re-signifying’ borrowed theory.
  • DEFINE: Explains how Gramsci’s ‘will’ diverges from Bergson’s, a fine-grained definitional clarification worth carrying forward.