Corporatism conceived as an autonomous industrial bloc excludes parasitic savers from accumulation.

Evidence

Punishment is often seen as a fundamental way to sustain cooperation. In a mutualistic framework, however, the competition among partners for participation in cooperative ventures is supposed to be strong enough to select cooperative and indeed moral dispositions (Barclay 2004 2006; Barclay & Willer 2007; Chiang 2010; Coricelli et al. 2004; Ehrhart & Keser 1999; Hardy & Van Vugt 2006; Page et al. 2005; Sheldon et al. 2000; Sylwester & Roberts 2010). Uncooperative individuals are not made to cooperate by being punished. Rather, they are excluded from cooperative ventures (an exclusion that is harming to them, and in that sense, can be seen a form of “punishment,” but that is not aimed at, and does not have the function of, forcing them to cooperate). — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 173 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Corporatism predates Fascism and was co-opted by Mussolini; Cooperation can be sustained by partner exclusion rather than by punitive coercion. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 173

Broader Connections

• Corporatism predates Fascism and was co-opted by Mussolini #qualifies (0.78)
• Cooperation can be sustained by partner exclusion rather than by punitive coercion. #exemplifies (0.72) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 173