Bernard Lewis — From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting the Middle East
1192 published claims from this book.
- A 16th-century European ambassador saw Ottoman discipline mirrored in Western decadence
- A fatwa is a juristic ruling, not a death contract
- A large professional history establishment can coexist with public historical oblivion
- A major shift in US policy and attitudes toward the Middle East is underway
- A misplaced diacritical mark turns Arabic adornment into fornication
- A movement’s founding ideology can become a trap that ensures its defeat
- A Mughal prince lost Ottoman support through courtly discourtesy toward the Sultan.
- A partially victorious revolutionary movement must keep its radical missionaries active.
- A people without state or church institutions produced no historical writing.
- A Persian physician’s autobiography shaped later Islamic autobiographical fragments
- A popular nationalist demand can be dropped with almost no opposition once conditions change
- A positive romantic legend of the Turk coexisted with outright hostility in the West
- A prosperous commercial age coexisted with chronic state fiscal crisis
- A shared ancestral word split meaning along pastoral-agricultural lines
- A single definite article in Resolution 242 shaped withdrawal interpretation for decades.
- A single omitted definite article in a UN resolution decided a diplomatic outcome.
- A state can become a proxy battleground between rival great powers
- A victor’s draft language can be inferred from textual traces
- A widely-believed false story about Soviet power is itself a political fact
- Abandoning history would leave falsification uncontested while real processes continue
- Abd al-Malik’s new Arabic coinage provoked a Byzantine casus belli
- Abolishing slavery made concubinage illegal across the Muslim world
- Absence of Roman rule made Hellenistic influence shallow and transient in Iran
- Academic life offers neither real money nor real power
- Ad hominem ridicule and rhymed curses formed the core toolkit of medieval propaganda
- Advanced ancient societies could flourish while neglecting history entirely.
- Adversaries can each legitimately claim the same historical victory
- Algerian natural riches coexisted with debt and unemployment under mismanagement
- All governments apply multiple standards, not merely double ones
- Almost six years of wartime intelligence work forced a difficult academic re-entry.
- Ambassadorial wives leveraged marital status into unique harem access
- Ambiguity over ‘imam’ lets leaders exploit eschatological resonance
- America’s case for Middle East intervention rested on disputed oil arguments
- An 1861 peasant-class conflict metastasized into a sectarian massacre of 11,000 Christians
- An ancient Hittite king uniquely felt compelled to justify usurping his brother’s throne
- An ancient Hittite king wrote the first known moral self-justification for power
- An Arabic memoir gives the fullest Muslim view of Crusader-era life
- An Assyrian king recorded feeding 69,574 guests at a ten-day banquet.
- An Assyrian king’s banquet inscription hosted nearly seventy thousand guests
- An imperial mood combines greed, smugness, and a sense of mission
- An incomplete revolutionary victory prevents a clean break from doctrine
- An Iraqi priest wrote the first Arabic descriptions of the New World
- An Ottoman ambassador first recommended meritocracy over patronage in 1790
- An Ottoman architect in Akbar’s service influenced Agra and Delhi’s buildings
- An Ottoman architect trained under Sinan worked on Akbar’s buildings
- An Ottoman envoy proposed replacing patronage with Prussian-style meritocracy
- An Ottoman gentleman’s account of seventeenth-century Vienna survives and is remarkable
- An Ottoman official’s son learning French was a singular early accomplishment.
- Ancient Arab poetry was formally categorized into propaganda genres
- Angel derives from words meaning messenger in both Hebrew and Greek
- Anglo-Ottoman diplomatic correspondence contained systematic deliberate mistranslation
- Angry mobs attacked US targets over events with no US involvement
- Another advanced civilization could thrive while neglecting historical record-keeping
- Anti-American anger reflects real disruption caused by Western domination
- Anti-American contempt stems from perceived moral corruption, not imperial grievance
- Anti-American U.N. majorities during Moynihan’s tenure were smaller than the norm, not larger
- Anti-American UN votes did not rise under Moynihan’s confrontational style
- Anti-colonial sentiment refocused onto superpowers once domination ceased being European
- Anti-imperialist explanations fail since Russia escaped heavier Muslim criticism
- Anti-Semitism as a term was coined by anti-Semites to dignify Jew-hatred
- Anti-Semitism functions as an interchangeable, replaceable programmatic label under Fascism
- Anti-Semitism was coined by anti-Semites as pseudo-scientific cover for Jew-hatred.
- Anti-Western Islamic revolutionaries eagerly adopted Western media and communications technology
- Anti-Zionism can cloak anti-Semitism unacceptable in public discourse
- Anti-Zionism can serve as respectable cover for shameful prejudice.
- Anti-Zionism functions as dual-purpose domestic and foreign policy
- Anti-Zionism functions as socially respectable cover for anti-Semitism in Anglophone politics
- Anti-Zionism gives anti-Semites respectable cover in the English-speaking world
- Anti-Zionism is not identical with anti-Judaism.
- Anti-Zionism serves as a respectable cover for anti-Semitism where direct prejudice is discredited
- Apocalyptic predictions served as political protest propaganda for rebel pretenders.
- Apocalyptic prophecy served rebels by casting them as expected saviors
- Apostasy is treason because Islam is a polity, not only a faith
- Apostasy law’s death penalty blocked Christian missionary work in Muslim lands for centuries
- Apostasy laws deterred Christian missionary work in Islamic lands.
- Applying the term feudalism outside western Europe is at best a misleading analogy.
- Arab celebration of Soviet arms was anti-Western spite, not pro-Soviet sentiment
- Arab conquerors first encountered rice through a poisoned-food suspicion anecdote
- Arab governments may keep the Israel conflict unresolved as a safety valve
- Arab leaders backed the Axis despite knowing Germany would promise them nothing concrete
- Arab leaders grew candid about national goals while ideology lagged behind.
- Arab leftists hesitated to condemn Nazi crimes against Jews
- Arab polemic targets Jewish religion more severely than it targets Israel.
- Arab populations doubted Saddam acted for more than personal power
- Arab publics acclaimed the arms deal for humiliating the West, not for Soviet alignment
- Arab rulers follow rags-to-riches self-enrichment while bin Laden renounced wealth
- Arab rulers tolerated bin Laden because offending the U.S. cost nothing
- Arab separatism was negligible before the 1908 Young Turk revolution
- Arab states frame irredentist annexation claims as reviving pre-imperial unity
- Arab states lack legitimacy because imperial borders cut across ethnic and religious loyalties
- Arab states want Saddam removed but fear partial action that only invites his revenge.
- Arab students long came to England to study their own history.
- Arab-Muslim identities operate at three nested levels above and below the state
- Arabic repurposed the Greek word for history to mean fable
- Arabic-speaking peoples defined themselves by Islamic loyalty rather than ethnicity
- Arabic’s dominance made Islamic civilization structurally monolingual
- Arabist scholars judged Arab rulers by treatment of Arabs, not foreign alignment
- Arabs accepted Ottoman dominance as legitimate Islamic leadership before nationalism
- Arabs accepted Turkish primacy as natural within Islamic universalism
- Arabs understood the Palestine conflict as territorial, not ideological
- Artificial colonial states acquire real identity through self-interested ruling elites
- Artificially drawn Arab states acquired real solidity through entrenched elites
- Asia’s independence era could give way to a new Soviet imperial age
- Asian scholars initially accepted orientalist scholarship before later rejecting it
- Asianism and Africanism are Greek inventions alien to Middle Eastern thought
- Assassination fails against institutions with replaceable leaders
- Assassination targets dictators but modern terrorism targets democracies
- Assassination-based movements fail to overthrow a single regime
- Assassins saw themselves as levelers of royal power imbalance
- Assassins spared the Templars because killing their masters was unprofitable
- Assassins targeted Sunni elites, not Crusaders, despite popular belief.
- Assimilation can intensify rather than reduce group hatred as boundaries blur
- Assimilation into secular states constitutes a subtler coercion than exclusion
- Asymmetry in religious-protection demands follows from the infidel-rule doctrine
- Atlantic-built ships enabled small European powers to dominate Asian seas
- Atlantic-built ships outgunned Ottoman vessels because they were designed for ocean weather.
- Backing the wrong heir in an imperial succession fractured diplomatic relations long after
- Bedouin nomads traditionally regarded kingship as dishonorable servitude
- Belief in a timeless Muslim essence underwrote the East-West hierarchy of progress
- Bilateral treaties of equal validity in two languages can lack any agreed common version.
- Bilingual treaties with a shared master text spawned divergent national versions with serious discrepancies
- Bin Laden objected to who ruled the empire, not to empire itself
- Bin Laden’s appeal exceeds that of prior pan-Arab and pan-Islamic revolutionaries
- Bin Laden’s appeal reached far beyond extremists to broad Arab publics
- Bin Laden’s appeal rested on renouncing wealth Arab rulers crave
- Black and gray propaganda predate their modern names by centuries
- Bloch’s early social utopia subordinated the church to socialism while retaining it
- Both anti-Semitic and anti-Arab prejudice disguise themselves as support for the opposite side
- Britain initiated the Arab revolt negotiations to weaken the Ottomans.
- Britain reluctantly entered the Middle East after preserving Ottoman integrity
- Britain sponsored its own pan-Arabism to defuse Arab nationalism
- Britain’s 1941 backing helped legitimize Arab unity as a political project.
- British administrative unification, not Ottoman precedent, created Palestine as a single political unit
- British Mandate rule deserves comparative study against neighboring empires
- British Middle East interest derived entirely from its India paramountcy
- British rule created the political entity of Palestine and a Palestinian nationality.
- British support for Arab unity aimed at securing imperial interests, not Arab aims.
- British wartime policy, not Arab nationalism, launched the Arab revolt
- British-occupied Egypt hosted the Middle East’s first genuinely free press
- Bulgarian artillery destroyed the Edirne archive in 1912
- Buying technology does not make a society technologically advanced
- By the 1970s Arab states were politically diverging despite cultural affinity
- Byzantine-Sasanid rivalry on this soil was resolved by Islam, not by either power.
- Calligraphic inscription substitutes for sacred imagery in Muslim worship
- Calligraphic inscriptions replace icons as Muslim devotional art
- Calling an Ottoman elite a Turk was an insult meaning ignorant peasant
- Calling opponents racist equated them with Nazis in Soviet rhetoric
- Catahistorians who deny truth serve falsification rather than neutrality
- Chess and backgammon retain Persian-invented terminology.
- China began building a global Middle East policy in the late 1950s
- China’s global policy expansion preceded its Middle East engagement
- Choosing a starting point can bias history without any falsehood
- Christendom had one religious minority, Islam had many
- Christian and Muslim mutual denunciations paradoxically revealed their shared Jewish roots
- Christian and Muslim scholars persistently consulted Jewish sages despite denunciation
- Christian converts sold their language skills openly in Muslim lands
- Christian Europe’s multilingual plurality structurally required language learning
- Christian European states armed Muslim armies against fellow Christians
- Christian merchants traded arms with Islam even during crusades and Ottoman wars.
- Christian minorities under Muslim empires ran their own schools, courts, and tax levies
- Christian monasteries functioned as the de facto taverns of Islamic lands
- Christianity incorporated the Hebrew Bible while Islam supplanted both Jewish and Christian scripture
- Christianity required convincing Jews of its truth, Islam did not
- Christians inherit Jewish scripture, Muslims replaced rather than adopted it
- Christians sold weapons to Muslim enemies throughout the crusades
- Chronic invasion blocked completion of Islamic feudalization until Ottoman times
- Church-state separation historically preceded Jewish civic equality
- Cinema has replaced state education as the most effective historical falsifier
- Civilization wars mobilize outside aid along religious rather than ideological lines
- Civilization’s broadening of identity has contained but never eradicated group hatred
- Civilizations divide into sweet-milk, sour-milk, and no-milk zones
- Classical Arabic alone is nearly useless for everyday conversation in the Arab world.
- Classical Islam recognized one religious-political power rather than a church-state division
- Classical Islamic jurisprudence prohibited voluntary travel to non-Muslim lands.
- Classical Islamic jurisprudence punished blasphemy with flogging and imprisonment, not death
- Classical Islamic law mandates due process that the Rushdie fatwa bypassed
- Classical Muslim jurisprudence categorized Muslims under Christian rule into three involuntary cases
- Classical Muslim jurists never imagined voluntary Muslim emigration
- Classical Muslim jurists ruled Muslims must leave non-Muslim lands
- Closed archives create historical bias favoring the closed society
- Coercion remains the most effective means of falsifying history
- Coffee required a complex process unlikely to be discovered by accident
- Cognate food words reveal the differing livelihoods of pastoralist and agricultural peoples
- Collective memory and accurate record-keeping are as vital to groups as to individuals
- Colonial languages taught for administration carried revolutionary ideas that doomed empire
- Communal and religious loyalties regained ground after pan-Arabism waned.
- Communal land doctrine yielded in practice to aristocratic grants after conquest
- Communist Marxism functioned as a secular religion with Jewish roots
- Communist rule froze older historical attitudes that reemerged after collapse
- Communist states functioned as a secular religion with its own church
- Comparing one’s own country’s war history to the enemy’s version changes the historical understanding
- Comparing past and present through modern eyes merely compares two modern views
- Competing tribal and sectarian narratives have been history’s oldest partisan form
- Complex bureaucratic warfare can defeat a reformer without identifying a killer
- Conquest creates new language and compound identity in both England and Iran
- Constitutional declarations of political principles signal their impotence, not their power
- Constitutional enshrinement in this tradition signals decline, not enforcement, of principles.
- Contemporaries overestimated Ottoman strength even as the empire was declining
- Contempt is the default stance of the truth-holder toward the outsider.
- Cook-shop carvers tasted food before guests to prove it was not poisoned
- Cook-shop carvers tasted guests’ food to prove it unpoisoned
- Cooperative edited volumes fail when contributors write at unequal levels
- Costly weapon purchases do not buy Middle Eastern states self-defense
- Court ceremonial compliance decided whether Ottoman Sultans received foreign princes
- Court poetry functioned as pre-mass-media propaganda and image-making for rulers.
- Court poets functioned as pre-modern public relations officers
- Court poets functioned as royal propagandists before mass media.
- Critical re-examination of history requires both developed critical faculty and freedom
- Cross-diplomatic wit failures reveal perceived hierarchies of refinement
- Cross-epoch parallels often compare two modern views rather than two real historical sequences
- Crusade-era commerce and war created professional interpreters called tarjuman
- Current Western troubles stem from failing to see cultural differences
- Cyrus is called messiah and honored above nearly all Jewish rulers
- Deception and fabrication inhered in myth from its origin
- Deceptive ancient texts were common enough that even Herodotus was dubbed Father of Lies
- Decolonization produced many new independent Arab states between 1948 and 1967.
- Decolonization risked replacing Western with Soviet domination of the Middle East
- Deep US-Israel alignment followed, rather than caused, Soviet gains in Arab states
- Defeat by a familiar tolerated minority provoked violent regime change across the Middle East
- Deliberate propagandistic falsehood permeated ancient texts and drew explicit moral condemnation
- Demanding minorities shed their self-defining narratives masks majority state ownership.
- Democracies resist assassination because their leaders are readily replaceable
- Denying outside influence on Islam distorts historical scholarship
- Devalued rather than revalued values drive the region’s fragmentation into tyranny
- Dhimma tolerance is a revocable concession from a dominant to subordinate group.
- Dietary staples cannot fully explain where Islam expanded
- Diplomatic rupture between Mughals and Ottomans came from protocol offense, not policy
- Discontented minorities disproportionately join revolutionary movements seeking equality.
- Distinctively Persian personal names survived Islamization as markers of retained identity
- Distorted history tempts some to reject history altogether
- Distrust of interpreters drove Europe and the Porte to end dragoman systems
- Dragomans softened imperial language in both directions, inflating English courtesy into Ottoman submission
- Dragomans systematically mistranslated diplomatic correspondence to smooth over status hierarchies
- Dynastic propaganda contrasted vigorous new rulers against effete degenerate rivals.
- Each major revolution follows a different inherited ideological script
- Earlier anti-Western movements failed to win bin Laden’s level of popular support
- Earlier anti-Western revolutionary movements lacked bin Laden’s popular reach
- Early Anglo-Ottoman diplomacy relied on Italian as an intermediary language
- Early Arab political groups sought autonomy within the Ottoman state, not independence
- Early Arabist discourse praised Arabs as servants of Islam, pre-dating nationalist reversal
- Early Arabist thinkers praised Arabs as servants of Islam, not as a nation
- Early elective Islamic succession failed bloodily and became dynastic rule
- Early Islam’s architecture and coinage defined itself against Christian rivals
- Early Islamic history showed the Middle East outpacing the West
- Early Islamic identity was forged in rivalry with Christian Rome
- Early Islamic tradition sharply distinguished kingship from lawful caliphate
- Early Muslim historians pioneered source criticism far ahead of any contemporary method
- Early Muslim student missions to Europe transformed their home countries
- Early orientalists made extreme personal sacrifices incompatible with venal motives
- Early pan-Arabism was a Syrian-led movement organized through secret societies
- Eastern European Jewry met classic criteria of a national minority
- Eastern European Jewry was an ethnic nation lacking legal status, like its neighbors
- Eastern scholars initially respected or ignored orientalists and only later grew critical.
- Eastern travelers to Europe sought wonders just as Europeans did in the East
- Economic need, not ideology, drove women’s emancipation in Muslim societies
- Education today ought to place many cultures and their shared heritage at its center
- Egypt historically drew immigrants but now loses citizens to emigration.
- Egypt reversed from an immigrant-receiving to an emigrant-sending country
- Egypt’s centrality and preponderance made it the natural Arab leader.
- Egypt’s demographic and cultural weight made it the natural Arab leader
- Egypt’s early Arabist ventures rewarded participants despite their political failure
- Egypt’s name and ancient history were officially erased during the Nasserist Arabist period
- Egyptian anti-Israel passion was overstated by international press reports
- Egyptian anti-Semitic texts reproduced medieval blood-libel and Holocaust denial tropes
- Egyptian audiences rejected didactic Soviet cinema for Western films
- Egyptian elites were less unanimously pro-Soviet than official media suggested after Czechoslovakia
- Egyptian factional strife and famine drove the Fatimids to military dictatorship
- Egyptian intellectuals and merchants nostalgically preferred Western over Soviet ties
- Egyptian Jews at large were free but forbidden to emigrate
- Egyptian Muslim nationalism dispersed all minority communities, not just Jews
- Egyptian nationalism historically oscillated between Pharaonic and Arab self-identification
- Egyptian nationalism was territorial, not Arab, before the world wars
- Egyptian nationalists initially dismissed pan-Arabism as a British anti-Ottoman plot
- Egyptian political jokes target the nation itself rather than the regime
- Egyptian public opinion would not seriously obstruct a government cutting losses on Palestine
- Egyptian soldiers profited from commerce during the Yemen war
- Egyptians hold competing Arab, Egyptian, and Muslim political identities
- Egyptians perceived Soviet aid as a repeat of British colonial occupation
- Egyptians preferred Western culture over Soviet during the Soviet alliance era
- Egyptians simultaneously hold three competing identities—Arab, Egyptian, and Muslim—that drive rival political alignments.
- Egyptians use the city’s foundation anniversary to contest their 7,000-year heritage
- Election in Sunni caliphate meant choice by a small qualified college
- Elective caliphate failed catastrophically, leading to dynastic rule
- Elite-populace cultural convergence previously held Muslim societies together until Westernization split them
- Empires often granted subjects more individual freedom than successor nation-states did
- Ending empire grievances redirected Egyptian activism to broader Arab and African causes
- Enlightenment bred racism because wrongs now need ideological justification
- Ethnic and sectarian divides made the Iran-Iraq war multi-layered
- Ethnic nationalism reached the Islamic world as foreign import embraced first by Christians
- Ethnoreligious movements seriously challenge state hegemony throughout the Middle East.
- Europe’s advantage over the Ottomans grew from its internal divisions, not its strength.
- Europe’s vernaculars became codified written languages beginning with Castilian in 1492
- European anti-Semitic texts flooded the Arab world through translation
- European artistic patterns had fully displaced traditional Islamic arts by the nineteenth century
- European captivity narratives abounded while Muslim ones went unwritten and unread
- European conquerors of the Balkans were a civilized Muslim people, not steppe barbarians
- European conquest imposed European ways of classifying the world on Muslim observers.
- European framing of the Ottoman Empire as declining outlived the empire itself
- European imperial rule reinforced Muslim expectations of communal legal autonomy
- European language knowledge among Muslims shifted from despised to indispensable
- European languages lexicalized Turkish national identity as an insult
- European lazaretto quarantine originated as a response to Muslim-world contagion fears
- European loanwords in Ottoman Turkish were mostly Italian and maritime until 1800
- European military instructors reframed Westerners as knowledge sources in Muslim eyes
- European models reshaped but did not initiate Islamic memoir-writing
- European nationalism supplied the ideological template for Jewish statehood claims
- European orientalism directly solicited many Islamic-world autobiographies into existence
- European powers actively sponsored Arab nationalist movements for their own advantage
- European powers trained native language cadets to replace unreliable dragomans
- European scholars were translating Ottoman texts well before any Muslim interest in Europe arose
- European slaves were medieval Islam’s most important import from the West
- European thought supplied Muslim lands with revolutionary symbols and values
- European travel accounts of the Levant were written without ever seeing what they described.
- European travel writers fabricated accounts of places they never entered
- European Turcology scholars reconstructed the pre-Islamic Turkish past
- European-style order and discipline, not weapons, gave Europe battlefield superiority over the Ottomans.
- Europeans read Ottoman decline as a loss of strength and will, not mere power
- Even a pro-execution mufti required a formal trial before any sentence
- Even famous Muslim rulers rarely received full-length biographies
- Even Icelanders were seized by corsairs and reported on them
- Even Jewish theology adopted the systematic form of surrounding Christian culture
- Even radical Islamic fundamentalists have adopted Western institutions like constitutions and elected assemblies
- Even sympathetic Arabs doubted Saddam’s motives and redistribution promises
- Even the Nazis used religious background to determine who was Jewish
- Evenhanded foreign policy is regarded as self-defeating even by classical Arab moralists
- Evenhanded policy toward friends and enemies undermines both alliances and deterrence
- Evenhandedness toward friends and enemies is a self-defeating foreign policy
- Every confirmed postwar chemical weapons attack occurred in the Middle East.
- Every UN member state practices some form of group discrimination.
- Exclusion from citizenship drove Palestinians to abandon pan-Arabism for their own state
- Executions for apostasy ceased long ago in the Muslim world
- Explaining why events happened is history’s most intellectually rigorous task
- External world shifts left no room for a schismatic Muslim power
- Failed revolts forged Shia identity as perpetual minority
- Failure to defend free speech erodes Western freedoms irreversibly
- Falling oil demand would strip Middle East rulers of their coercive funding
- Falsehood and intimidation have become normalized in U.N. procedures
- Fascist paramilitary youth models shaped most Arab political movements including the left
- Fatimid Caliphate combined imperial sovereignty with revolutionary mission.
- Fatimid eastern strategy is only known through indirect evidence
- Fatimid expansion peaked when a Baghdad general proclaimed their caliph for a year
- Fatimid reach exceeded their military capacity to support distant gains
- Fatimid Red Sea strategy paired the Aydhab port with ideological penetration of Yemen
- Fatimid religious mission followed and exploited their trade routes into India
- Fatimids’ ideological isolation guaranteed their own eventual defeat.
- Fiction channels social criticism that censors fail to recognize as subversive
- For many Islamist radicals the internal enemy takes priority over foreign ones
- For two centuries after conquest Egypt remained a governed province of the eastern Caliphate.
- Forced conversion breeds suspicion that hardens into hatred when converts prosper
- Foreign-educated Muslim students became vectors of Western ideas in their home countries
- Forged attribution is a more potent lie than straightforward falsehood
- Forged propaganda comes in altered-text and wholly-invented forms
- Forged prophecies bank on a true postdated prediction to sell a false one
- Forged prophetic traditions were being invented for political purposes into the 1990s.
- Forged-ascription propaganda predates modern disinformation and the Soviet term for it
- Forging sayings of the Prophet for politics persists into modern times
- Freedom and independence are distinct and often mutually exclusive
- Friday sermons channeled official news from rulers to subjects in medieval Islam
- Frying was rare in the ancient Middle East because oil was costly
- Germany and Italy supplied the unification model for Middle East unity movements
- Global linguistic convergence has increased rather than reduced translation demand.
- Global response to the Kuwait invasion was uniquely unanimous
- Grant-holders profited by collecting full tax but paying only a tithe
- Great powers can be drawn into regional conflict even without deliberate intent.
- Great-power rivalry shaped the outlook of Mideast statesmen and Western specialists alike
- Greek writing about Persia was respectful despite centuries of conflict
- Group boundaries shift from blood to permeable culture, religion, and citizenship over time.
- Group hatred evolves through stages that begin with animal exclusion instincts
- Group hatred is transmitted primarily through intergenerational oral storytelling of grievances
- Group hatred targets what a person is, not what they do.
- Hadith collections functioned as legal casebooks for establishing rules of procedure
- Hajji Khalifa blamed Muslim intellectual negligence for Christian advance
- Hassidic Judaism was a necessary precursor to Zionism
- Hassidism was a necessary prerequisite for the Zionist movement
- Headgear, not weaponry, marked the deepest cultural boundary for Muslim armies
- Hereditary succession persisted even among nomadic Middle Eastern tribes
- Heritage erasure operates through distortion, silence, and omission rather than lies.
- Heroic Islamic history writing doubled as deliberate ruler-serving propaganda.
- High culture can flourish without a historical orientation
- Historians distrust their own materials because evidence is inherently fragmentary and unreliable
- Historians face social and material pressure to conform to favored schools of thought
- Historians of the Middle East traditionally trained in four to five dead languages
- Historians progress from establishing what happened to explaining why it happened
- Historians should strive for fairness despite the impossibility of full objectivity
- Historians should strive for fairness through explicit awareness of their own biases
- Historians’ self-censorship for political ends is a modern nationalist practice
- Historical espionage between Christian and Muslim worlds was extensive but poorly documented.
- Historical narratives can be lawfully ‘cooked’ like balance sheets
- Historical revisionism requires developed critical faculties plus freedom
- Historical writing can either correct or intensify group hatred
- Historically the standard response to unassimilated others was elimination via conversion, expulsion, or massacre.
- History did not professionalize until the nineteenth century
- History is distorted chiefly through invention backed by fabricated evidence
- History is falsified by coercion, intimidation, and pressure when direct force fails
- History shows Shia rulers who gained power either fell or governed like Sunnis
- History’s eclipse by social sciences weakened evidentiary standards in public discourse
- History’s potential misuse raises questions of who controls its telling
- Holocaust denial laws criminalize a claim states leave flat-earth beliefs free
- Holocaust guilt can drive either supporting or denouncing Israel as expiation
- Holy war doctrine demands emotional hatred that compassion-based theology forbids.
- Hostile anecdotes about dynastic founders are propaganda, not history.
- Hostile narratives shaped later portraits of controversial rulers, not historical deeds.
- Human-rights outrage at the UN applied stricter standards to right-wing Europe than black Africa.
- Humanities study serves understanding and enrichment beyond practical utility
- Husayn’s authentic manifestos stressed Islam, not Arabism
- Husayn’s revolt was dynastic-religious, not Arab nationalist
- Identical U.S. withdrawals are read as prudence by Americans and cowardice by Middle Easterners.
- Ideological racism emerged precisely because Enlightenment values demand rationalizations for evil
- Ideology alone cannot unify a region; a powerful state must drive it.
- Illicit contact with Christendom forced Islamic jurists into contested legal rationalizations.
- Immigrant groups lose usefulness once emigration stops and homegrown generations lack old-world skills
- Imperial frontiers ignore inhabitants’ rights, leaving rival claims nearly parallel
- Imperial partition of the Middle East created entities not accepted by their inhabitants
- Imperial political ideology directly shaped which history could be studied
- Imperial powers drew frontiers that maximize future regional conflict
- Imperial rule often granted subjects more individual freedom than successor nation-states did.
- Imported right-left labels mislead when applied to non-Western politics
- Imposing Western political categories distorts understanding of Middle Eastern loyalties
- Impossible ideals still demand disciplined effort toward them
- Impossible perfect objectivity does not justify abandoning scholarly standards.
- In medieval Islam bread was treated with quasi-religious sanctity
- In Soviet usage, the word racist meant Nazi-linked irredentism, not color prejudice.
- India and Pakistan hold unique geopolitical advantages over Western powers in the Middle East
- Individual hatred stems from perceived grievance while group hatred targets identity
- Insecurity drove small landowners to commend themselves to great ones
- Instrumentalizing history for present politics is worse than ignoring it
- Inter-confessional espionage was extensive but mostly undocumented by design
- Internal apostates are treated as more dangerous enemies than external infidels
- Internal jihad against apostate rulers is a medieval concept modernized.
- International consensus against Iraq’s invasion rivaled the anti-Nazi coalition
- Intra-Islamic propaganda outweighs anti-non-Muslim propaganda in frequency and intensity.
- Iran justified state-sponsored killings by invoking the Prophet’s example
- Iran was largely Sunni until the Safavid dynasty imposed Shi’ism
- Iran’s 1979 revolution was a classical mass revolution
- Iran’s Islamic revolution was the first electronically networked modern revolution
- Iran’s revolution inspired subversive plots even in communist-run Bosnia
- Iran’s revolution resonated most with Sunnis where Shi’ism was unknown
- Iran’s revolution structurally parallels pre-revolutionary France and Russia.
- Iran’s revolutionaries imitated Robespierre and Stalin, not Islamic models
- Iran’s revolutionary methods derived from European models, not Islamic precedent
- Iranian civilization dominated Islamic political and cultural power for centuries
- Iranian clerical rule breaks new ground in Islamic history
- Iranian defenders justified the assassination bounty by citing prophetic precedent
- Iranian revolution followed the pattern of prior great revolutions in needing political power change
- Iranian revolution’s methods borrowed from European Jacobin and Stalinist precedents
- Iraq and Iran sought WMD as a deterrent against American intervention
- Iraq was ruled by a Sunni minority despite a Shiite majority
- Iraq’s Shia majority endured Sunni ascendancy across a millennium of regimes
- Iraq’s Shia majority has been ruled by Sunnis since the Middle Ages.
- Iraq’s Shia majority remained subordinate to Sunni rulers for centuries
- Islam and modern European Christianity hold incompatible conceptions of what religion itself encompasses
- Islam conquered most of the Christian Roman Empire in its first century
- Islam has no clerical absolution; each believer absolves himself
- Islam has no sacraments and requires no ordained priesthood
- Islam holds God himself to be supreme head of state
- Islam is theocratic in principle since God alone is sovereign
- Islam lacks an ordained priesthood with sacramental function
- Islam never separated religion from the state as Christianity did
- Islam recognized Christendom as its only genuine rival civilization early on.
- Islam regarded Asia and Africa as teachable converts unlike rival Christendom
- Islam traditionally makes no compartmental separation between religion and other life domains
- Islam-West conflict is a civilizational clash beyond policy or issues
- Islam’s advance and retreat defined Europe’s eastern and western borders
- Islam’s ban on images made the Middle East less responsive to visual propaganda.
- Islam’s egalitarian message has been continuously contested by older river-valley social orders
- Islam’s everyday dignity can flip into explosive rage during upheaval.
- Islam’s fusion of religion with state makes holy war inherently political
- Islam’s moral law was beyond any single agency’s or branch’s control
- Islam’s pork ban may have halted expansion into pig-farming regions
- Islam’s relationship to Jewish sources differed structurally from Christianity’s
- Islam’s self-perception of triumph mirrored Christian imperial self-regard
- Islam’s spread clashed continuously with the ancient river-valley civilizations it conquered
- Islam’s traditional tolerance of other believers exceeded Christian practice before secularism.
- Islamic advance and retreat defined Europe’s boundaries and identity
- Islamic art substitutes calligraphic inscriptions for representational imagery in worship.
- Islamic autobiography is distinctive for its universal ancestry-opening
- Islamic autobiography serves oneself, others, and posterity.
- Islamic biography arose to verify hadith narrators’ reliability
- Islamic classical doctrine divides the world into house of Islam and house of war
- Islamic conquests introduced sugar to the Mediterranean and eventually the New World
- Islamic court writers merged biography of ruler with self-autobiography
- Islamic culture’s famed dignity can erupt into rage-driven violence in upheaval
- Islamic dynasties picked successors by suitability, not primogeniture
- Islamic fundamentalists condemn rule by infidels, not domination itself
- Islamic historiography sustained semi-epic heroic biography long past its early period.
- Islamic jurists categorically prohibited Muslims voluntarily entering non-Muslim countries
- Islamic land grants lacked feudalism’s immunities and sub-infeudation
- Islamic law classified abandoned and church lands as fay’ community booty
- Islamic militant literature centers Muslim governments as usurpers more than external enemies
- Islamic monotheism absorbed Iranian dualist notions of a cosmic clash.
- Islamic political theory fuses God and Caesar into one sovereign
- Islamic polities practiced broad tolerance while denying full religious equality
- Islamic qat’i’a grants lacked the immunities and sub-infeudation of European fiefs.
- Islamic revolution defined its enemies as the infidel abroad and apostate at home.
- Islamic revolutionaries retained Western constitutional and legal forms while rejecting Western laws
- Islamic revolutionaries selectively accept Western technology despite rejecting its ideology.
- Islamic revolutionary conflict is pragmatic versus ideologue, not moderate versus extreme
- Islamic revolutions are driven by a recurring conflict between ideologues and pragmatists.
- Islamic saga historiography served both morale-raising and propaganda ends
- Islamic source criticism predated comparable methods anywhere in the world
- Islamic states only authorized learning from Europe to better fight it.
- Islamic vocabulary is the most effective symbolic tool for political mobilization
- Islamic worldview divides humanity into the House of Islam and House of War
- Islamist movements define their program as undoing Westernization rather than rejecting modernity wholesale
- Islamist movements excused Soviet brutality because Western tolerance invited open criticism
- Islamist revivalism mistakes an imagined past for a re-creatable one
- Islamist revolutionaries rejected the West selectively, not wholesale
- Islamists attacked Western secularism because its pluralism posed a real challenge
- Islamists demonized the West because its consumerist temptation threatened tradition
- Islamophobia parallels anti-Semitism as hatred toward resident minorities in Christendom
- Isma ili missionaries entered India early by both land and sea routes
- Ismaili missionaries paired religious conversion with trade in medieval India
- Ismailis once dominated Shia Islam before declining to a minor sect.
- Israel’s 1967 victory triggered Soviet anti-Zionist demonization of the classical anti-Semitic type
- Israel’s 1967 victory triggered the Soviet campaign equating Israelis with Nazis
- Israel’s open society enables more news coverage than its closed neighbors
- Israeli democracy stems from traditions of Jewish communal autonomy.
- Israeli propaganda exposed Nasser’s grammatical errors to undermine his authority
- Israeli victory inverted the victim-oppressor moral frame in Western opinion
- Israelis read the racism charge through Holocaust memory, not color
- Italian was the only European language usable across the Ottoman lands until the 1800s
- Italy launched the first Arabic radio broadcasts from outside the Arab world in 1935
- Jew-hatred as systemic ideology is uniquely Euro-Christian, not Islamic
- Jewish communities deliberately rejected historiography for over a millennium
- Jewish historiography ceased after the Babylonian return despite biblical example
- Jewish history is inseparable from the wider languages of host civilizations
- Jewish institutional life assimilated to whichever dominant culture surrounded it
- Jewish marriage law absorbed surrounding Christian and Muslim norms
- Jewish marriage law absorbed the surrounding civilization’s marital norms.
- Jewish messianism emerged only after Babylonian exile under Persian influence
- Jewish presence in Russia grew only through eighteenth-century territorial expansion
- Jews deliberately rejected the writing of their own history
- Jews fared better in pluralist than in fully secular societies
- Jews flourished better under hierarchical pluralist empires than under secular states
- Jews rejected historiography for centuries as a conscious refusal, not incapacity
- Jews were seen as a race only in Nazi pseudoscience.
- Jihad and crusade differ in scriptural mandate and scope
- Jihad and crusade differed fundamentally in religious warrant and scope.
- Jihad originally meant striving to spread Islam, not primarily holy war
- Jihad originally obliged peaceful mission, with war only as last resort
- Jihadist anti-Americanism opposes who rules, not imperial domination itself
- Jihadists believed their Afghan war defeated the USSR and emboldened attacks on the US
- Judaism could only flourish, not merely survive, under Christian or Muslim rule
- Judaism flourished only under Christian or Muslim rule, not elsewhere
- Judaism permitted scripture translation while other scriptural religions resisted it
- July 1954 Anglo-Egyptian agreement on Suez marked Britain’s Middle Eastern decline
- Key Judaeo-Christian cosmological concepts originated in ancient Persian religion
- Khomeini exceeded Shari’a procedural norms by making rather than applying law
- Khomeini personally targeted the Shah, Carter, and Saddam
- Khomeini’s appeal transcended sectarian boundaries across the Sunni Muslim world
- Khomeini’s Rushdie fatwa made new law rather than applying existing law
- Kingship and caliphate differ by lawful rule, not succession method
- Knowing friend from enemy is the highest human prudence.
- Knowledge flow reversed from Islamic to Western centers by 1800.
- Language education sowed the ideals that ended the empires that spread it
- Language proximity cannot explain why Iran avoided Arabization
- Language relatedness alone cannot explain why Arabization succeeded in Egypt but failed in Iran
- Late-19th-century reformers blamed Islam’s decline on Ottoman tyranny, not on Islam itself
- League-of-Nations Arab states largely had fabricated identities unnamed for centuries.
- Lebanon’s civil war factions defied simple left-right and religious classification.
- Lebanon’s identity was rooted in mountaineer Christian and heterodox refuge before 1920.
- Lebanon’s mountain refuge sustained autonomous identity through centuries of Ottoman rule
- Legitimacy in dynastic monarchy derives from family membership
- Lewis defines America as a European enterprise contra American self-identity.
- Lewis frames fourteen centuries of Islam-West contact as a single binary struggle.
- Lewis frames Ottoman and Soviet decline as parallel paths needing a Kemalist savior
- Lewis trained in five dead languages before professing Middle Eastern history
- Long-established Muslim minorities can be culturally European yet still face violent conflict
- Losing two Gulf oil producers barely moved world oil prices.
- Loss of historical memory harms groups the way amnesia harms individuals
- Loss of Palestinian territories freed Arab states to stop denying a Palestine entity
- Making coffee required discovering a long elaborate process, unlike most foods and drinks
- Mandatory powers installed regimes mirroring their own institutions in Arab territories
- Many current world troubles stem from failing to understand culturally alien societies
- Marxism’s Jewish-founded structure spared Jews an adversarial role in its sacred history
- Mass conversion threatened state revenue, prompting a legal fiction taxing the land itself
- Mass conversion to Islam forced the treasury to tie tax to land, not religion.
- Mass executions in Iran reflect revolution, not Islam or Iranian culture
- Mass Western news coverage of the Middle East began with the Crimean War
- Media interest in the Arab-Israeli conflict stems from public curiosity about Jews specifically
- Medieval Arabic historical literature exceeds all of Christendom’s combined
- Medieval Arabic writers ranked Arabic above all other languages in an evolutionary hierarchy
- Medieval Arabs understood plague contagion but devised no preventive measure
- Medieval assassins were volunteers for whom survival was disgraceful
- Medieval Christian pilgrims faced suspicion as both Christians and pilgrims in the Middle East
- Medieval court panegyrics were recycled between patrons and still mislead historians today
- Medieval court poets still shape how historians read their patrons today
- Medieval European scholars studied at Arab Muslim universities in Spain and Sicily.
- Medieval in-kind tax lists are goldmines of food price and product data
- Medieval Islam’s worldview inverted onto its own periphery the Orientalist hierarchy
- Medieval Islamic historical writing outpaced all Christendom combined in bulk
- Medieval Islamic physicians recorded autobiographical memoirs as moral lessons.
- Medieval Islamic society had the highest voluntary travel mobility of any premodern society
- Medieval Islamic society had unmatched voluntary personal mobility
- Medieval Muslims dismissed Europe as historically and intellectually insignificant
- Medieval panegyric poems were recycled and resold across patrons
- Medieval propaganda techniques closely anticipated modern public-relations methods
- Mehmet II actively patronized Greek and Italian learning after conquering Constantinople
- Mentioning a ruler’s name in Friday sermons marked submission to his sovereignty
- Messianic hopes shifted from religious to secular redeemers after Shabbetai Sevi’s failure
- Messianism shifted from religious to secular redeemers after Sabbatai Zevi
- Middle East allies fear genuine democracy more than Saddam’s removal
- Middle East borders were drawn as straight lines by European colonial rulers
- Middle East dictatorships manufacture external conflict to justify internal oppression.
- Middle East discontents are a clash of civilizations, not of states
- Middle East frontiers were drawn by European statesmen with rulers on maps
- Middle East hostility to the West is civilizational, predating specific grievances.
- Middle East political conflict stems from clashing European and Islamic conceptions of sovereignty
- Middle Eastern aspiration for autonomy exceeds actual capacity
- Middle Eastern Christians led the first wave of Easterners studying in Europe
- Middle Eastern democratic forms mask the region’s real monarchical politics
- Middle Eastern dictatorships need conflict to justify domestic oppression
- Middle Eastern history scholarship suppresses the slave trade that shaped it
- Middle Eastern leaders misread the US as a reincarnated British Empire.
- Middle Eastern political forms should not be equated with Western originals
- Middle Eastern regimes benefit from keeping the Israeli conflict unresolved
- Middle Eastern regimes may keep the Israel conflict simmering as a safety valve
- Middle Eastern religion emphasizes practiced loyalty over doctrinal belief
- Middle Eastern traders visited the West long before Europeans traveled East
- Middle Eastern women’s travel writing began only around 1900
- Middle Easterners misread America as the restored British Empire
- Militant Islamist strategy rested on a belief that America cannot absorb casualties
- Military defeat historically triggers either radical adventure or sullen withdrawal
- Military headgear was the last bastion of Islamic clothing identity to fall
- Military uniforms carried symbolic weight that weapons did not
- Minorities are outsiders who choose to retain their otherness within a state.
- Minorities are outsiders within frontiers who refuse full assimilation.
- Minority religious elites absorb the institutional forms of the dominant culture around them
- Modern bureaucracy reimagined citizens as regulated particles in a machine
- Modern Hebrew functions structurally as revived Yiddish in new vocabulary
- Modern Middle Eastern nationalism was constructed by force and education in the twentieth century.
- Modern nationalism first prompted the idea of a Jewish state
- Modern racism and antisemitism are civilized rationales for primitive instincts
- Modern terrorism against democracies mirrors old assassination tactics against autocrats
- Modern translation technology has vastly widened literary reach beyond its original worlds
- Modern tyrannies are overwhelmingly republics rather than monarchies
- Modern Western perspectives can enrich understanding of medieval Middle East
- Modernity, not dynasty, forged Ottoman-Indian Muslim solidarity
- Monarchy was attacked from left, religious, and modernist quarters alike
- Mosque layout in breadth derives directly from prayer-row practice
- Mosque networks and armies are the only organizations tyrants cannot control
- Mosque networks give Islamist opposition an infrastructure no tyranny can fully suppress
- Most Arab states were artificial creations with invented names
- Most mid-century Arab youth movements modeled themselves on European Fascist parties
- Most Middle Eastern urban residents bought cooked food rather than cooking at home
- Most modern Arab state names and borders were European inventions
- Most modern Middle East states are recent colonial or Ottoman constructs
- Most modern Middle Eastern political murders are religiously motivated.
- Mughal India and the Ottomans both feared Nadir Shah’s expansionism
- Mughal-Ottoman relations collapsed over courtesies and forms of address.
- Muhammad’s migration transformed him from rebel to statesman
- Murad II paraded captured knights across the Middle East as propaganda
- Muslim and Western historians radically disagreed on which battle mattered
- Muslim captives of Christians wrote almost no captivity accounts, revealing one-sided cultural curiosity.
- Muslim extremists themselves, not Western polemicists, drove the negative image.
- Muslim fury stems from a centuries-old reversal of dominance over Christendom
- Muslim historiography produced no national histories, only universal and dynastic ones
- Muslim hostility to the West grew from humiliation and Western self-discrediting wars.
- Muslim perceptions of European ascendancy shifted from military to economic inferiority
- Muslim political authority derives legitimacy from Islam more than from nation or sovereignty
- Muslim student missions to Europe began only in the early 1800s, for military modernization
- Muslim travelers replaced contempt for Europe with respect born of perceived weakness
- Muslim-Western civilizational struggle reversed direction around 1683
- Muslims once admired America for wealth and success without moral suspicion
- Muslims recognized Byzantine Christians as fellow Romans and rivals
- Muslims recognized Byzantium as a rival universalist faith and empire
- Muslims remember an era when Islam ruled as the Earth’s greatest civilization.
- Muslims saw defeating Byzantium, not conquering Europe, as the real goal
- Mythology functions as primitive history legitimating authority and group identity
- Mythology functions as primitive science, religion, and history for the tribe.
- Naming a ruler in Friday sermons encoded submission or independence
- Nasser-era Arabism suppressed even the name of Egypt itself
- Nasser’s pan-Arabism was attacked as both Egyptian imperialism and national self-squandering
- Nasser’s regime coincided with rapid breakdown of Egyptian public sexual conservatism
- National school histories focus overwhelmingly on one side’s wars
- National state forms cannot explain Middle East popular movements.
- Nationalism arrived in the Middle East as a European import that local use transformed
- Nearly all Middle Eastern states retain legal polygamy and restrictive intermarriage rules.
- Nebrija’s 1492 grammar was the first to treat a vernacular seriously
- Neighboring states fear partial intervention against Saddam more than his reign
- Neighbors want Saddam removed but fear half-hearted intervention
- New land grants made the muqta a profit-taking tax intermediary
- New World bullion and colonial resources enriched Europe at Islam’s expense
- New World bullion and colonial resources reversed the wealth gap between Europe and Islam.
- New-world foods were named after distant places they did not come from
- Nineteenth-century Europeans racialized Shi’ism as Aryan resurgence against Semitic Islam
- No Islamic jurist anticipated voluntary Muslim emigration to non-Muslim lands
- Nomadic Bedouin culture prized refusal to submit to kings
- Non-intervention fails if rival powers still intervene in the region
- Non-state Arab actors organized transnationally for Palestine before their governments acted
- Non-Turkish Ottoman subjects served as carriers of Western-derived national ideas
- Non-Western militaries concluded they need nuclear weapons to deter the US
- Non-Western scholars initially welcomed Orientalist scholarship and used it readily
- Objectivity is unattainable yet historians must still pursue it rigorously
- Official historiography requires an institutional sponsor to exist
- Official history is engineered to blind public opinion for political ends
- Official Ottoman court chroniclers wrote candidly about major defeats
- Oil revenues freed autocratic states from pressures toward democratization
- Oil wealth unevenly distributed fractured Arab solidarity into separate state agendas.
- Oil-rich Middle East countries have done worse economically than oil-poor ones
- Old Muslim minorities in Europe were acculturated yet still persecuted
- Only Turkey, Tunisia, and Israel have formally outlawed polygamy in the Middle East
- Opening an autobiography with one’s pedigree was nearly unique in antiquity
- Oral performance carried poetry’s propaganda to mass audiences in pre-literate societies
- Ordinary Egyptians resented Russians more than their own authoritarian government
- Orient originally designated the Middle East and Islamic world, not Asia
- Orthodoxy means officially sponsored truth whose deviation carries penalties.
- Ottoman administrative knowledge of subject Christians never entered its literature
- Ottoman advisers warned sultans that European naval power threatened Istanbul’s prosperity
- Ottoman aid to Sumatra was diverted by a Yemen rebellion
- Ottoman ambassador selection reflected rank and Christian-social standing in Istanbul
- Ottoman ambassadors were sometimes chosen for wealth over competence.
- Ottoman archives are so rich they force rewriting most Ottoman historiography
- Ottoman archives could rewrite most existing Ottoman historiography.
- Ottoman archives guarded knowledge through layered linguistic and bureaucratic barriers
- Ottoman archives held millions of documents long closed to Western scholars
- Ottoman archives held over 50,000 registers spanning the entire empire.
- Ottoman archives offer more material than Western-trained scholars have used.
- Ottoman archives remain barely catalogued and could force a rewriting of the field
- Ottoman archives were guarded by deliberate obscurity as effectively as by policy
- Ottoman archives were historically guarded by layered linguistic obstacles
- Ottoman arrival in the Indian Ocean triggered naval rivalry with the Portuguese
- Ottoman attitudes toward Europe shifted from contempt to detailed curiosity by 1665.
- Ottoman chancery style could bury meaning in verbiage
- Ottoman consular records span over three centuries in a massive register series
- Ottoman consular registers systematically recorded foreign commercial activity from 1567.
- Ottoman court chose ambassadors by cost-saving rather than merit
- Ottoman court historians frankly chronicled their own defeats
- Ottoman cupola design solved cold climate and prayer-line needs
- Ottoman customs documents reached Venetian archives written in Hebrew letters.
- Ottoman decline eventually made Western charges against the Turks partly accurate
- Ottoman decline in the face of foreign threat produced genuine brutality toward subject peoples
- Ottoman decline is cited as the paradigm for the Soviet empire’s collapse.
- Ottoman decline stemmed from institutional resistance to Western science, not internal decay
- Ottoman decline stripped Turks of both imperial and religious authority to feel superior
- Ottoman diplomacy modernized from a household office into a ministry after 1836.
- Ottoman diplomatic modernization began only when foreign policy became crucial
- Ottoman diplomatic prose often degenerated into obscuring bombast
- Ottoman diplomatic protocol demoted foreign monarchs to mere provincial rulers
- Ottoman dragomans formed kinship networks that crossed embassy loyalties
- Ottoman economic weakness stemmed from too little central control, not too much
- Ottoman envoys produced systematic written travel accounts of Europe
- Ottoman envoys recorded their travels in standardized embassy books called Sefaret-name
- Ottoman expansion reached Vienna twice before its first defeat in 1683
- Ottoman fiefs held no seigneurial rights, leaving peasants freer on the land
- Ottoman finance records used a cipher-like script for speed and secrecy
- Ottoman historiography degenerated as Ottoman civilization declined
- Ottoman historiography located imperial origins in the Islamic caliphate, not ancient Turkish history
- Ottoman Imperial Archives excluded all Westerners before 1949
- Ottoman intellectual interest in Europe lagged far behind Europe’s interest in Islam
- Ottoman intelligence took a fantastic 1588 report of an Akbar-Portuguese plot seriously
- Ottoman interest in Europe only began once Europe seemed dangerous
- Ottoman Jewish customs receipts were written in Hebrew because both officials were Jewish
- Ottoman knowledge of Mughals began with refugee princes and rival embassies
- Ottoman leaders publicly conceded European naval superiority by the mid-1500s.
- Ottoman memoir tradition was so weak that major texts were unknown to its historiography
- Ottoman military dominance of Europe ended only in 1683 at Vienna
- Ottoman naval expeditions for Southeast Asian allies were repeatedly diverted by nearer crises
- Ottoman records are densest where its administration was most direct.
- Ottoman records on Balkan provinces exceed those on Asian territories
- Ottoman reformers proposed replacing patronage with Prussian-style meritocracy
- Ottoman rule tolerated minorities while Christian reconquests erased entire populations
- Ottoman rule was relatively non-persecuting compared with Christian reconquests
- Ottoman statecraft treated calibration of fear as governance technique
- Ottoman statesmen already saw European naval power as a mortal threat by the 1510s.
- Ottoman statesmen recognized European naval superiority as early as the sixteenth century
- Ottoman sultans hired historians to publicize victories to rival rulers
- Ottoman Sultans refused to sponsor Mughal pretenders out of realpolitik prudence
- Ottoman sultans ruled subject to Islamic Holy Law they could not alter
- Ottoman translations of European history focused on royal biography
- Ottoman treatment of subject peoples compared favorably with Christian reconquest practices
- Ottoman Turks possessed a sophisticated literary and artistic culture, not barbarism.
- Ottoman victory bulletins were commissioned historiography sent as political theater to rival rulers
- Ottoman writers proposed a Suez canal a century before it was built
- Ottoman writers recognized European discoveries as threats to Islamic trade by 1580
- Ottoman-Mughal ties faded by the late 16th century as Europeans rerouted trade
- Ottoman-Mughal ties shrank to commerce and then faded with Western sea dominance.
- Ottoman-Mughal ties were triggered only by the Shiite Iranian threat
- Ottomans refused European rulers imperial titles, addressing them as provincial kings
- Outsider scholarship on Islam reads better to Western lay readers than insider accounts
- Ownership claims over history were used to preempt Western study of Middle Eastern history
- Palestine as a name carried no continuous statehood or Jerusalem-capital tradition
- Palestinian elites abandoned pan-Arabism after experiencing exclusion from power.
- Palestinian guerrillas mattered far less to Egyptians than to Western observers
- Palestinian refugees fared better than countless other 20th-century refugee populations
- Palestinians were denied citizenship and work rights in most Arab states.
- Palestinians were treated as foreigners in nearly every Arab country
- Pan-Arab passion and anti-Western hatred have never translated into unified political action
- Pan-Arab political solidarity is a myth; shared culture produces no political force
- Pan-Arab unification required a Prussia-like leading state, not just ideology
- Pan-Arab union was explicitly defined against the Ottoman Caliphate model.
- Pan-Arabism survives as public orthodoxy long after leaders abandoned it
- Pan-Arabism’s adoption let Arab states hold Palestinian territories and keep refugees stateless.
- Pan-Arabism’s first great age drew directly on German and Italian nationalist models
- Pan-Arabism’s own logic undercut the moral force of Arab claims against Israel.
- Pan-Turkish nationalism was built by Russian-educated exile Tatars reacting against pan-Slavism
- Passports and security checks predate modern bureaucracy by centuries
- Patronized poets functioned as classical Islam’s public-relations apparatus for rulers.
- Permitting outspoken criticism can actually mask tighter political control
- Persian culture and Shi’ism held Iran’s ethnic periphery together after the Safavids
- Persian influence introduced messianism to the Hebrew Bible
- Persian rulers translated imperial edicts into each provincial language
- Persian, not Arabic, was the classical literary language of late-medieval Islam
- Phanariot Greeks remained loyal to the Ottoman state despite Greek independence
- Philhellenism perpetuated Western hostility to the Turk
- Physicians gained privileged access to Ottoman harems denied to other male travelers.
- Physicians gained unique Western access to harems and produced harem ethnography
- Poetic boasts served as battlefield morale weapons in early Arabia
- Poetry propaganda served rulers, rebels, and personal social announcements alike
- Poetry served as mass media in pre-print societies.
- Poets served as the public relations professionals of the pre-modern world
- Political factions in early Islam metamorphosed into religious sects
- Political freedom was greater under the Mandates than before or after
- Political grievances divert attention from deeper socioeconomic causes of anti-Western feeling
- Political Islam’s appeal rests on the failure of imported Western models.
- Political jokes under Arab regimes turned self-critical where other autocracies targeted leaders
- Political upheaval created receptivity to Isma’ili messianic ideology.
- Politically engaged literary theory applies a market model of eclectic consumption
- Polities cannot function without shared consensus, even autocratic ones
- Polyglot classical rulers could bypass interpreters and speak directly to subject peoples
- Polytheism’s open pantheon makes genuine religious tolerance structurally easy.
- Poorly paid interpreters leaked diplomatic secrets out of vanity and bribery
- Post-1918 Anglo-French control of the Middle East gave way to new contestants
- Post-1945 Middle East great-power succession changed players but not the script
- Post-1948 Arab intellectuals cited Hitler to validate antisemitic conspiracy theories.
- Post-1948 Egyptian anti-Israel literature imported European anti-Semitic texts wholesale
- Post-1967 defeat pushed many Egyptians toward Egyptian identity over Pan-Arab nationalism
- Post-1967 Egyptians debated Egyptian versus Arab national identity
- Post-1967 Nasser purged his inner circle of all potential opposition
- Post-Cold-War superpowers neither could nor would keep imperial rule in the Middle East
- Post-imperial Muslim migration to Europe followed former colonial ties
- Post-Ottoman mandatory powers shaped Arab states in their own institutional image
- Post-Ottoman nationalist states shaped Western views of the Turks through their own liberation narratives
- Post-republic Turkish scholars reframed Ottoman history as a national phase.
- Postwar hostility to Orientalism grew from political conflict, not scholarship defects
- Postwar Islamic anti-imperial anger transferred from Europe to the superpowers
- Postwar Middle Eastern republics often masked continued dynastic dominance
- Postwar university expansion created new positions in previously neglected fields like Oriental studies
- Pre-1800 European loanwords in Turkish were few and mostly Italian maritime terms.
- Pre-Islamic Arabian battles resembled ritualized sport more than war
- Pre-Islamic Arabian tribal battles resembled sport more than lethal warfare.
- Pre-Islamic Arabic kingship carried mostly positive associations
- Pre-Islamic Bedouins rejected kingship as a form of servitude
- Pre-Islamic civilizations preserved foreigners’ histories mainly through their own authors, and neglected them
- Pre-Islamic Mediterranean civilizations showed almost no interest in other peoples’ histories
- Pre-modern Muslim historical writing lacks the empathy for enemies found in Jonah and Aeschylus
- Pre-modern Muslim Middle Eastern loyalties ran to religion and kin, not nation or land
- Pre-modern Muslim scholars regarded Western history as lacking value and purpose
- Pre-modern sources show empathy for enemies except in Muslim historiography
- Pre-national Arab political loyalty ranked religion first, dynasty second, ethnicity last
- Pre-national Middle Eastern loyalty ran to religion, kin, and village, not nation.
- Primogeniture is a European concept absent from Muslim dynastic succession
- Primogeniture is a European idea that never took root in Muslim dynasties
- Pro-Western Arab leaders governed against prevailing popular sentiment
- Propaganda became a negative label that people apply only to opponents’ messages.
- Propaganda forgers embed accurate old predictions to sell false future ones.
- Propagandistic history-writing is a modern nationalist invention
- Rabbinical Jewry is defined maternally and by conversion, never racially.
- Reading Ottoman administrative records requires deep knowledge of the empire’s institutions
- Reading Ottoman records requires decoding an opaque administrative system
- Redemption narratives turned involuntary captives into travel writers
- Reference-style consumption of scholarship obscures its broader thematic value
- Refugees fleeing persecution supplied skilled translators to the Ottoman empire
- Refusing all compromise handed Moses’s enemies the opening to destroy him.
- Regime change inaction can carry greater dangers than intervention.
- Regimes can grant freer speech while tightening their grip on organized action.
- Regional autocracies would feel threatened by a democratic Iraq
- Rejected old values with unassimilated new ones produce tyranny and terror
- Relativist epistemology enables both discrediting good evidence and validating bad evidence
- Religion rather than nationality has been the primary basis of identity in Islam
- Religion-based identity in Islam predates Western secular nationhood.
- Religion, not nationality, anchored identity for Muslims and medieval Christians
- Religious condemnations can be timed for domestic political gain
- Religious identity, not nationality, structured medieval Muslim self-conception
- Religious jealousy over divine favor underpins the first recorded murder
- Religious murder for internal succession differs from killing foreign oppressors
- Religiously motivated murderers killed many modern Middle Eastern rulers and intellectuals
- Removing specific grievances does not relieve structural anti-Western sentiment
- Renewed Middle East instability derailed the US pivot to Asia
- Repeated failed Shia insurrections cast imams in a Christ-like sacrificial light.
- Repeated prior conquest eroded resistance in Arab-conquered provinces but not Iran
- Republican soldiers who attacked barracks under Mazzini were executed by the monarchy.
- Resolving Egypt’s Suez grievance worsened rather than improved Middle East stability
- Revolution freed Egypt from an embarrassing imperial claim it could not abandon otherwise
- Revolutionary dynasties toned down messianic titles once in power.
- Revolutionary Islam supplied both goals and a taxonomy of enemies for Iran’s revolution
- Revolutionary regimes cycle from ideological domination back to pragmatist rule once passion cools.
- Rice was unknown to seventh-century Arab conquerors in the marshes
- Rice was unknown to the Greco-Roman world
- Right-left labels mislead when applied outside their Western origin
- Rising Egyptian Muslim nationalism dissolved all foreign minorities, not just Jews.
- Rival bardic sagas and sectarian historiography persist into modern nations
- Rival state ambitions sabotaged Arab unity against Israel in 1948
- Romantic philhellenism distorted Western perception of the Ottoman Turks.
- Roughly 260 villages were emptied and half a million Palestinians became refugees in 1948
- Royal titles faced attack from liberals, Islamic fundamentalists, and modernizers alike
- Rural Muslim peasant women held more freedom than urban women
- Russia acquired its Jewish subjects by Polish partition conquest, not by invitation
- Russia and Turkey each followed divergent translations of the same 1774 treaty
- Saddam prioritized weapons of mass destruction over the welfare of Iraqis.
- Saddam prioritized WMD over both his people’s welfare and his army
- Saddam repositioned from Gulf order defender to Robin Hood figure
- Saddam’s legitimizing lineage drew on Iraq-native non-Arab conquerors
- Sati al-Husri’s pan-Arab ideology had to argue Egypt into the Arab nation
- Scattered evidence indicates the Fatimid Mission ran a central grand strategy.
- Scholarly representation of Islam was dominated by Western outsiders
- Scholarship on the Arab-Israeli conflict is a self-sustaining industry
- Scientific racism emerged to justify slavery once religious justifications failed
- Second-generation Ottoman Jews lost their European linguistic edge and were replaced by Greeks.
- Sectarian theology differently shaped Sunni and Shi’a historical narratives
- Sectarian theology shaped what Islamic historians chose to defend
- Secular and religious visions of this civilization remain locked in an open contest.
- Secular ideologies replicate religious salvation-history as a narrative form.
- Selective relevance can corrupt history more than outright neglect can.
- Self-critical history can be as arrogant as self-glorifying history
- Self-flagellating national history is as self-centered as triumphalist history
- Self-flagellatory national history is as arrogant as self-serving history.
- Self-perception of history is the most effective tool for shaping group hatred
- Sensitive subjects warrant scholarly attention precisely because sensitivity signals something is wrong.
- Sensitivity in a society signals sites of wrongness that demand attention
- Seventeenth-century Turkish statecraft taught calibrated fear and hope
- Shared Arab cultural identity does not translate into political bloc action
- Shared monotheistic traits make Islam and Christianity uniquely prone to conflict
- Shared religious premises make inter-Abrahamic conflicts more virulent than cross-civilizational ones
- Shared theological vocabulary made Christian-Muslim polemics intelligible and vicious.
- Shared words diverged in meaning because Arabs were pastoralists and Hebrews farmers
- Shari’a prescribed permanent war between Islam and Christendom, in theory only.
- Shi’a historiography held that history went wrong after Ali’s murder
- Shi’ism functioned to differentiate Iran from all its Sunni neighbors
- Shi’ism originated in Iran as an Arab import rather than an indigenous Persian faith
- Shi’ism served as Iran’s marker of difference from all bordering Sunni states
- Shi’ite identity served to differentiate Iran from its Sunni neighbors.
- Shia and Sunni diverge on whether history went right or wrong after the Prophet
- Shia obedience to authority is conditional and revocable, unlike Sunni
- Shia rebel method of propaganda then armed attack mirrors the Prophet’s own career
- Shia rebels modeled their strategy on Muhammad’s Mecca-to-Medina exile
- Shia rulers who seized power behaved like the Sunnis they replaced
- Shia schisms repeat because of contested political succession
- Sixteenth-century Ottoman lands had fewer mills per capita than eleventh-century England
- Small land grants created a middle class of Muslim freeholders
- Smoking tobacco was once a capital offense under some Islamic rulings
- Solving the Arab-Israeli conflict would not solve the region’s other fundamental problems
- Some Orientalists pursued their scholarship to the point of ruin
- Some scholars dispute outsiders’ right to study Middle Eastern history at all
- Sophisticated civilizations can thrive while deliberately ignoring history
- Soviet and Egyptian meanings of socialism diverged sharply
- Soviet anti-Zionist racism charges derived from earlier pan-Turkism and pan-Iranism attacks.
- Soviet atheism functioned as a religious orthodoxy of its own
- Soviet bloc expansion was expected to absorb client states permanently
- Soviet Central Asian borders were drawn to guarantee future ethnic conflicts
- Soviet client treaties were drafted in Moscow and concluded in days
- Soviet influence weakened pan-Arabism from both the left and the right
- Soviet law classified Jews as a nationality without territory, trapping them between identities
- Soviet policy actively discouraged pan-Arabism in favor of separate state relations
- Soviet wartime propaganda deliberately obscured Nazi persecution of Jews
- Specific Western grievances do not explain persisting anti-Western hostility.
- State-compelled national history teaching risks becoming ideological indoctrination rather than self-knowledge.
- Stopping eastward revenue drain and boosting commerce funded Egypt’s first independent Muslim state.
- Storytellers recited exemplary past deeds to move audiences to emulation
- Subject peoples’ nationalism provoked the Turkish imperial majority into its own nationalism
- Successful revolutionary movements must betray their millennial promises
- Successful revolutions must sacrifice their messianic radicalism to consolidate power.
- Successful revolutions require audiences who already know the script’s outcome
- Sufi wandering rather than organized missions spread Islam eastward
- Sultanic power was checked by Islamic Holy Law rather than popular consent
- Sunni and Shia historiographies diverge over whether history serves or has betrayed God’s purpose.
- Sunni and Shia names derive from Arabic for custom and party
- Sunni consensus doctrine sanctified the historical status quo as divine guidance
- Sunni dominance over Shia was not settled until the high Middle Ages
- Sunni Islam’s beliefs foster a developed historical self-consciousness
- Sunni revitalization through Seljuq power contained the Fatimid challenge
- Superpower involvement paradoxically contained the regional conflict’s danger
- Support for Nasser’s return split between staged-political theories and genuine accountability demands.
- Tenth-century Baghdad needed a chain of translators to read a Latin letter
- Territorial kingship titles were nearly absent in the Islamic world before 1900
- The ‘superior culture’ explanation for Iran’s survival fails on direction of borrowing
- The 16th-century Ottoman threat mirrors the Cold War confrontation
- The 1948 defeat’s humiliation drove violent overthrow of Arab regimes.
- The 1954 Anglo-Egyptian Suez evacuation marked Britain’s power decline in the region
- The 1967 crisis escalated from a boundary dispute into an existential confrontation
- The 1967 defeat freed Arab states to outsource the anti-Israel struggle to Palestinians
- The 1967 defeat freed Arab states to support Palestinian self-determination.
- The 1967 defeat rekindled Egyptian national identity apart from Arabism
- The 1967 defeat shifted Egyptian blame onto their Arab allies
- The 1991 Gulf War outcome motivated both Iraq and Iran to pursue WMD.
- The 1991 Gulf War was concluded without occupying Baghdad or toppling Saddam
- The academic field of Oriental studies formally renamed itself around 1973
- The alphabet democratized writing and widened the reach of written propaganda.
- The apple functioned as a generic label under which new foods entered languages
- The Arab democratic movement cannot yet be dismissed as a sham or failure
- The Arab Revolt functioned as a foundation myth for both sides.
- The Arab revolt was dynastic and religious, not nationalist.
- The Arab Revolt’s military value and popular support were exaggerated.
- The Arab states’ names and borders reveal their colonial, artificial origins
- The Arab-Israeli conflict is not the bloodiest Middle East conflict
- The Arab-Israeli conflict reduces to three fundamental questions
- The Arab-Israeli dispute provokes unique emotional passion in Western debate
- The Arabic title malik originated as a positive royal designation
- The Arabic word for history derives from moon-based dating
- The Arabic word for nationalism began as a Turkish term of abuse
- The Arabic word for nationalism was a Turkish coinage meaning factionalism
- The Assassins called themselves fidaiyun, a term their enemies renamed.
- The Assassins targeted Muslim leaders, not Crusaders, whom they served only as allies
- The Assassins targeted Sunni rulers, not Crusaders
- The battle of Tours was a footnote to Muslim historians, not a turning point.
- The Bible gives ancient Iran uniquely positive treatment
- The bin Laden as Robin Hood framing conflates distinct eras and moral categories
- The black Abbasid and red European flags both shifted from revolution to regime symbols
- The bound codex book form likely originated in Iran.
- The British civil-service concept transplanted a distinctively British model of authority into Palestine
- The British Mandate introduced crucial changes beyond visible material legacies
- The caliphate was founded to solve succession after Muhammad’s death
- The concept of revolution as legitimacy was alien to Islamic tradition
- The concept of revolution is a Western import to the Middle East
- The early Muslim conquests annexed lands then considered part of Europe
- The early Ottoman Empire ran on elaborate, conscientious bureaucracy, not incompetence.
- The enemies-of-God concept spans classical antiquity and all three Abrahamic scriptures
- The fall of Constantinople was a triumph of a civilization, not of barbarism
- The Fatimid Caliph doubled as revolutionary leader subverting the Abbasid order
- The Fatimid caliphate contested Abbasid legitimacy itself, not just their rule.
- The Fatimid chancery deliberately maintained two tiers of court poetry for different audiences
- The Fatimid revolution succeeded only partially where the Abbasid one had triumphed fully.
- The Fatimid schism was untenable amid Islam’s unified front against Christendom
- The Fatimid state institutionalized missionary training in Cairo colleges.
- The fatwa’s timing served Iran’s internal radical power politics, not religion.
- The first genuinely free press in the Middle East existed under British occupation
- The first Islamic civil war turned on the legitimacy of regicide
- The founding text of pan-Arabism was sponsored by the Khedive against the Sultan.
- The Friday sermon functioned as official state media in medieval Islam
- The Greek dragoman elite remained loyal to the Ottoman state
- The Greek word historia evolved into a word for tall story in Arabic
- The Hajj moved merchants, scholars, and slaves across the Islamic world annually
- The Hebrew Bible’s self-critical historiography influenced Christians but not later Jews
- The hidden twelfth imam vanished around 873 and Twelvers await his return.
- The institutional label orientalism was renamed by 1973 because of political pressure
- The Iran-Iraq war supports a multiplicity of partial explanations.
- The Iran-Iraq war was fought over the Shatt al-Arab waterway.
- The Iranian religion originated the dualistic cosmic struggle of good versus evil
- The Iranian revolution may be replaying French and Russian revolutionary phases
- The Iranian revolution reached far beyond Iran into the broader Islamic world
- The Iranian Revolution was a genuine revolution akin to the French and Russian ones.
- The Iranian revolution’s appeal crossed sectarian lines where Shi’ism was unknown
- The Islamic cosmic struggle is a divine test, not a battle humans can win.
- The Islamic Middle East historically stretched into Central Asia past the Soviet border
- The Ismailis were the leading Shia branch for centuries
- The Italian invasion of Ethiopia steered Egypt toward pan-Arab leadership
- The Jews who remained in Egypt were the poorest and most culturally Egyptian
- The Jews who stayed in Egypt are the most culturally Egyptian of all
- The Kata’ib’s initial model was Czech sport, not Nazi storm troopers
- The label ‘Assassin’ was imposed by enemies while the self-descriptor was fida’i
- The label propaganda is now applied only to what opponents disseminate, never to self-description.
- The madrasa originated as counterpropaganda against Ismaili and Fatimid influence.
- The madrasa system was created as an ideological counter-weapon against Isma’ili Shiism.
- The madrasa was created originally as Sunni counterpropaganda against Isma’ili Shi’ism.
- The medieval Assassins failed to overthrow any regime and ended as hired hitmen
- The medieval Assassins killed mostly Muslims, not Crusaders
- The Middle East as a civilization extends past the Soviet border into Central Asia
- The Middle East never developed acute race consciousness like Europe did
- The mosque network gives Islamists a communications infrastructure no other opposition can rival
- The Muslim pilgrimage was the earliest major driver of long-distance personal travel
- The Muslim religious-political unity framing is partly a modern colonial contrastive construct.
- The name Palestine was never attached to a state before the British Mandate.
- The nation-state’s power claim drives Islamism’s focus on the state.
- The Nazis themselves popularized the terms racist and racism
- The Nazis’ fall and the Holocaust revelations combined to weaken Arab positions on Palestine.
- The Ottoman and Mughal empires only cooperated against the Shi’ite Iranian threat
- The Ottoman conqueror of Constantinople collected Greek books and humanists.
- The Ottoman economy lagged not from state overreach but from weak central mobilization
- The Ottoman Empire had already peaked when Europe feared it most
- The Ottoman Imperial Archives had never been opened to Western scholars
- The Ottoman sack of Constantinople was less destructive than the Crusader sack of 1204.
- The Ottoman Turks were culturally closer to Byzantium than the Western Christians were
- The Ottomans considered a Suez canal but were outmatched by European naval power
- The Ottomans seriously considered a Suez canal in 1568 but later abandoned it
- The Palestine conflict broadened from a three-party affair to an inter-Arab cause from 1936
- The pork ban may have hemmed in Islamic expansion geographically
- The Prophet’s biography fused religious authority with pre-Islamic Arab heroic saga.
- The Qur’an’s chapters reflect Muhammad’s shift from rebel to ruler
- The Quran reserves malik for flawed or equivocal mortal rulers
- The real regional danger is American withdrawal, evidenced by Middle Eastern chemical weapons use
- The region called the Middle East was invented by imperial and Cold War interests
- The religion-politics separation framework is Christian-specific, not universal
- The Robin Hood framing of bin Laden is a delusion at both ends
- The same act of religious conversion reads as apostasy or enlightenment depending on perspective
- The same claim about the Prophet can serve opposite moral purposes
- The same historical victory can be legitimately claimed by opposing national narratives
- The same ideals drove Christian Ottoman rebels and Muslim anti-colonial rebels
- The same political term can carry radically divergent meanings across allies
- The self-ascribed term for Islamic warriors was fida’i, not assassin
- The Seljuq state valued military service over fiscal yield
- The separation of church and state was first made law in the United States
- The Shia are a scattered global minority concentrated around Iran.
- The State of Israel was a creation of East European nationalism
- The stirrup enabled Persian courier networks by making fast riding stable
- The stirrup let Persians build admired courier networks across the Middle East
- The studied peoples eventually objected to being the object of orientalist study
- The Sultan’s language of vassalage was rendered as friendly equality in translation to England
- The Sunni caliphate was conceived as elective by a narrow college
- The Sunni-Shia split is fundamentally about dynastic versus elective succession
- The Sunni-Shia split is political in origin, not theological.
- The superior-culture absorption argument fails because the direction of language learning differed from Rome-Greece
- The term Middle East denotes where the three religions meet, not a fixed region
- The term Orient originally meant the Islamic world immediately east of Europe
- The term orientalist was officially abolished at the 1973 Paris congress
- The term umma was semantically transformed to denote the Arab nation.
- The Twelver imam line ended with a concealed Mahdi in 873
- The U.N. functions as an organization for the conservation of conflict
- The U.S. faces a pressured binary choice between dominating or abandoning the Middle East.
- The UN normalized falsehood and intimidation as procedural norms by the 1970s
- The unification of Germany and Italy served as the model for Arab nationalist unification
- The United Nations conserves conflict rather than resolving it as a parliament
- The US drew anti-Western hostility without territorial colonialism
- The US-Israel strategic alliance resulted from Soviet gains in the Middle East
- The Western compartmentalization of religion is foreign to Islamic tradition.
- The word Levantine originated from the Italian word for sunrise
- The word revolution has been devalued to mean any trivial change or mere coup
- The Zoroastrian devil is an independent cosmic power, not a divine servant
- Theological anti-Jewish hostility is a Western Christian, not an Islamic, tradition.
- Theoretical ideological racism originated in Western Europe specifically
- Third World solidarity politics treated Western guilt-feeding deference as a diplomatic commodity
- Third Worldism recast the golden-age myth of Western innocence lost
- Tobacco smoking was once punishable by death under Islamic law
- Tolerance keeps the tolerated group in a subordinate, revocable position.
- Trading companies’ Middle Eastern ‘factories’ were trade centers leaving rich archival records
- Traditional Islam lacks any church or priesthood structure
- Traditional Islamic states divided governance between military and bureaucratic elites
- Translation can convey a foreign civilization’s self-view to outside readers.
- Travel is individual journeys of record, distinct from collective migration
- Treating history as sacred precedent drove early Muslim source criticism
- Treating Muslim identity as incidental underwrites the Enlightenment’s universalism claim
- Treaty negotiation timelines signal a country’s real independence from the Soviet Union
- Tulunid and Ikhshidid rulers sought local autonomy, not the Caliphate.
- Tulunid rulers aimed to rule Egypt without challenging the Abbasid Caliphate.
- Tulunid-era Egypt lacked the cultural renaissance that emerged in Iran.
- Turkey alone among 1918’s defeated powers rejected the imposed peace
- Turkey’s hat reform ended the last non-Western element of military dress
- Turkish scholars studied ancient but neglected modern Turks abroad as émigrés.
- Turkish scholars study ancient Central Asian Turks but neglect present-day outside-Turkey Turks
- Turkist scholars redefined Turkish history as national and ethnic rather than dynastic and religious
- Two rival Egyptian narratives blamed either world Jewry or American imperialism for Israel.
- UN members face asymmetric penalties that made anti-American voting nearly costless
- UN Resolution 242’s ambiguous wording on withdrawal hinged on a grammar-encoded article absence
- Unattainable ideals still dominate human conduct.
- Under the Fatimids, tribute flowed into Egypt rather than out of it
- Uneven oil wealth fractured inter-Arab relations after 1973
- Universities offer neither real money nor real power
- US oil policy pursued access rather than direct control
- US support for Israel grew from Soviet successes, not prior preference
- US-supported Middle East rulers breed the terror directed against America
- Victorious premodern rulers paraded captured war trophies across vast distances as visual propaganda
- Violent intimidation suppresses historical scholarship where state coercion cannot
- Voluntary civil society had little pre-colonial precedent in the region’s traditional associations
- War mobilization drove women’s emancipation in the Ottoman Empire
- Warring for God makes one’s opponents automatically God’s enemies.
- Wartime intelligence work gave Orientalists specialized modern regional knowledge
- Wartime state intelligence work drew directly on academic Orientalists
- Washington rejected toleration as condescension toward inherent rights
- Western and Middle Eastern interaction relied on Italian two-stage translation until the nineteenth century
- Western audiences misread religious-political murderers as targeting outsiders when Israelis were incidental
- Western colonies displaced Middle Eastern coffee and sugar exports entirely
- Western impact caused Middle East political formlessness and instability
- Western intervention discredits its own proposed solutions in the Middle East
- Western lay readers found outsider-written scholarship on Islam most satisfying
- Western literary forms permanently transformed Middle Eastern literary languages
- Western literary forms replaced indigenous genres down to the level of language itself
- Western literary genres displaced traditional Islamic forms across the whole region
- Western media attention to Palestinian guerrillas far exceeded Egyptian attention
- Western merchants controlled even basic Middle Eastern consumption goods by the late 1700s
- Western misinterpretation of the term rayah was later adopted by the Turks themselves
- Western power and ideas devastated the Islamic world from 1800 onward
- Western press labels of Lebanese Kata’ib as rightist are misplaced
- Western proposals are discredited by the very fact of being Western
- Western reports miscast the Assassins as anti-Crusader when most victims were Muslim rulers
- Western Romantic Arabism eventually shaped Arabs’ own self-image retrospectively
- Western scholars of Arabic long studied the classical language over living dialects
- Western scholarship on Turkish identity directly supplied mid-century Ottoman nationalists their categories
- Western self-criticism as moral exception vindicates the civilization that produced it
- Western study of Islamic history moved from credulity to critical method to total rejection
- Western-proposed solutions to Middle Eastern problems are discredited by the proposer
- Western-style institutions were judged by their failed local imitations, discrediting reform.
- Westerners explain away hostility by scapegoating rival colonial powers.
- Wheeled transport in the Middle East arrived only with imperial transit needs
- Wheeled vehicles came to the Middle East only with British imperial needs
- Wine prohibitions created legal friction between Muslim majorities and non-Muslim minorities.
- Women’s status in Christendom exceeded that in polygamous societies
- World attention to the Arab-Israeli conflict reflects fascination with Jews more than strategic importance.
- World cuisines divide into sweet-milk, sour-milk, and no-milk zones
- Zionism grew from Jewish religion, messianism, and persecution, not race.
- Zionism’s defining traits came from Eastern European Yiddish culture
- Zionist emigration to Palestine was minuscule next to mass Jewish migration westward
- Zionists pitched Jews as carriers of European culture against the Arabs
- Zoroastrian communities enabled European Orientalists to access ancient Iranian languages