Court poets functioned as royal propagandists before mass media.

Evidence

A much more accurate idea of the image of al-Mu izz, as seen by his followers and projected to his new subjects, may be found in the poems of Ibn HaĀÆni’, his Andalusian panegyrist. The poet, in medieval Islamic courts, often had an imĀ­ portant public function. As panegyrist, he praised his patron; as satirist, he abused his enemies. In a society that was sophisticated and literate, but without mass media, poetry could to some extent take their place; the poet devised, for publication and dissemination, versions of events or sketches of personalities which were vivid, memorable—and slanted. He was the propagandist, or, as we might now say, the public relations officer and image-maker of the ruler, and his compositions can tell us a great deal about the policies and intentions of rulers and sometimes even about the responses of the ruled. — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans, 369 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

In pre-modern times, poetry was in many ways the most interesting and the most elusive of the means of propaganda. In the days before journalists and public relations officers, poets fulfilled these functions for tribes, chiefs and rulers. They had been engaged in these tasks for a long time. The Roman Emperor Augustus, for example, had his court poets in Rome doing public relations work for the empire in general and the emperor in particular. One might even argue that Virgil’s great epic, the Aeneid, is a public relations job for the Roman imperial idea. — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans, 463 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Court poetry functioned as pre-mass-media propaganda and image-making for rulers. — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting…, 369; Court poets functioned as pre-modern public relations officers; Poetry served as mass media in pre-print societies. — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting…, 369 (+5 more)

Broader Connections