The Friends of Attention — Attensity!: A Manifesto of the Attention Liberation Movement
353 published claims from this book.
- A catalytic idea can unlock dormant collective generosity in a community
- A century of individualism plus devices destroyed collective shared attention
- A lie about attention has become invisible by embedding itself in everyday institutions
- A named class of attentional caregivers exercises care-as-attention
- A new kind of political being, homo attentus, will reshape politics.
- A school for attention activism was founded in Brooklyn in 2023
- A scientific consensus can still rest on a misleading historical inheritance
- A scientific framework’s presuppositions are culturally and historically conditioned
- A successful attention movement needs dramatization, denunciation, and mass
- A technical scientific word can become a mass political slogan within a decade.
- A three-part program of study, coalition-building, and sanctuaries forms the proposed response.
- A veteran coder turned against the tech industry’s growth ethos
- Advertising must saturate entire populations to surface biddable attention
- Advocates must manufacture collective attention before issues reach ballots
- AI chatbots are the ultimate escalatory tool in the war for attention
- Algorithmic attention extraction monetizes love and the need for love.
- All art is a request for and record of attention
- All five largest world companies are data-extractive tech giants
- Amateur practice turns attention into a durable antidote to commodified quick-twitch culture
- American fitness club membership grew 2500 percent between 1972 and 2006
- An artwork can consist solely of directing attention to existing things.
- An attention-extraction industry converts human care into money and harms everyone.
- An industry has channeled and commodified human attention like fracking extracts natural resources.
- Any shared hands-on practice qualifies as attention resistance
- Art and the humanities are special zones for practicing emancipatory attention.
- Art creates a mobile sanctuary protected from utilitarian extraction
- Art suspends ordinary operations and provokes productive puzzlement
- Art’s core function is holding open contemplative space against distraction.
- Artistic activity is a distinct training ground for free attention
- Artists, thinkers, and activists already practicing attention are the movement’s vanguard.
- Artists, thinkers, and dreamers supply the revolutionary possibilities of the present.
- Attempts to reach sustaining people heighten felt isolation
- Attensity is a reclaimed scientific term for direct study of attention itself
- Attensity names the free, shared movement of attention treated as transformative good.
- Attensity was an early-twentieth-century term abandoned when introspection lost to mechanist psychology.
- Attention activism began as an organized collective response to a perceived crisis.
- Attention activism can be screened by whether activity builds shared, owned connection
- Attention activism is a reclamation project to defend against reduction to salable data
- Attention activism is pro-technology and rejects retrenchment
- Attention Activism operates through study, coalition-building, and sanctuaries.
- Attention activism reframes a catastrophic present into flourishing by contesting attention capture
- Attention activism requires collectively building attention’s public meaning
- Attention activism requires dedicated spaces for collective experimentation and care
- Attention activists are defined by a sustained practice connecting them to the world
- Attention activists can weaponize inherited everyday tools nonviolently
- Attention can be defined beyond action and receptivity
- Attention can be quantitatively measured and thereby bought and sold.
- Attention capture exploits ordinary pleasant content, not just violence or shock
- Attention creates a shared space beyond both instrumental logic and endless suspension
- Attention economics is a behaviorist arms race won by the most stimulating content
- Attention economy pits financialization against alternative forms of value
- Attention exceeds any measurable property, so exchanging it for money always entails loss.
- Attention extraction is a historical contingent result of human choice
- Attention extraction is coercion and theft, not a trade-off
- Attention extraction is fundamentally a denial of human dignity.
- Attention extraction operates at multiple scales demanding a many-zone coalition
- Attention extraction reaches people before they can reach their communities
- Attention extraction reduces people to quantifiable commodities and demands collective remedy.
- Attention extraction shapes even our intimate access to other people
- Attention extraction thrives on gratifications we must relearn to want against
- Attention extraction unjustly commodifies the self and requires collective rather than individual remedy
- Attention frackers capitalized on pre-existing civic decline rather than creating it
- Attention frackers profit by covertly dominating attention formation.
- Attention fracking preempts people’s own intentions to seek communal contact
- Attention functions as the ground for ethics, not merely for personal satisfaction.
- Attention is a fundamental life resource, not a discretionary commodity.
- Attention is a shared common resource, not private property.
- Attention is an essential precondition of life on par with water
- Attention is culturally recognized yet not as an activist cause
- Attention is diverse cognitive engagement, not narrow focus
- Attention is judged by its blooms, not its duration
- Attention is learned rather than innate, always and for everyone
- Attention is learned, not innate, so it can be retrained
- Attention is the defining political and existential question of the current era
- Attention is the fundamental medium of all human connection
- Attention is the mechanism by which we reteach things their loveliness
- Attention is the substrate of care for self, community, and planet.
- Attention moves through shared systems just as bodies share material systems.
- Attention politics begins when activists reframe private distress as collective injury
- Attention practice can take craft forms like welding rooted in childhood apprenticeship
- Attention research was canalized into a visual, durational, cybernetic paradigm by its industry funders.
- Attention sanctuaries exist now but hide because they are endangered.
- Attention sanctuaries require explicit written community agreements
- Attention science defined attention as visual, durational, and cybernetic to fit its funders’ tools
- Attention science never actually studied lived experience, only task performance.
- Attention was studied in deep ways before military deoxygenation experiments standardized it
- Attention-activism art has a half-century lineage from Fluxus through Ono to Abramović
- Attention-extraction rose from side hustle to center of plutocratic profit
- Attention, not networks or devices, is the true substrate of all connection.
- Attention’s goal is anthesis, an irreversible flowering into communion
- Attentional disorders and constant device use are epidemic among American youth.
- Attentional exploitation can be transformed into a basis for collective political identity
- Attentional exploitation now reaches from legislators to young children at unprecedented scale
- Attentional practices of great spiritual traditions constitute waiting on the infinite
- Audience attention is generative of greatness in performers
- Augustine framed distractibility as a mark of the Fall and attention as redemptive.
- Augustine treated human distractibility as sin and attention as redemptive
- Awareness infrastructure converts real crises into felt distance
- Both civic groups and apps train attention, but in opposed directions
- Calling someone distracted means accusing them of unauthorized attention.
- Care work exercises a live, relational attention that readouts cannot capture
- Challenging expert claims requires refusing the expert’s framing language entirely
- Choosing what to attend to is itself the core political and ethical act
- Choosing what to value is the actual substance of ethics and politics
- Civic community thinning in America predated the commercial internet
- Coalition building begins with an explicit inventory of members’ skills
- Cognitive neuroscience officially defines attention as selection for a task
- Coined description of the attention economy as extraction of users’ minds
- Collective effort itself, not a found solution, creates self-governance.
- Collective outrage from shared clear truths is a catalytic transformative force
- Collective practice anchors and sustains attention activism
- Compulsive phone use stems from engineered coercion, not personal willpower failure
- Concern about attention span misdirects effort from recovering deeper attentional modes
- Contemporary attention art descends from a lineage of score-based performance and happening traditions.
- Contradiction detection is the method for predicting when attention extraction becomes unsustainable
- Contradictions signal when a tactical flip becomes possible
- Corporations buy science to protect financial interests, distinct from ambient cultural bias
- Corrupt science flows from paid capture rather than ambient cultural bias.
- Cultural preoccupations canalized attention research, pathologizing kids via a game
- Cultural revolutions can arise from mixed state, market, and individual drivers
- Debates about attention are ultimately ontological, not political
- Deep attention occurs in a relational space that extraction systems partition and plunder
- Defining attention as action-catalyzer reduces attentional life to a cascade of incitements
- Democratic stability and wealth inevitably produce bureaucracy, oligarchy, and stagnation.
- Digital platforms extract money by tapping core human desires for connection
- Distraction is actually unauthorized attention, power-determined
- Diverse attentional practices form a common arsenal against attention extraction
- Early industrial capitalism created homo economicus, a new market-defined subject.
- Ecology transformed from obscure science to utopian battle cry within a decade.
- Environmental activism identity took decades of work to construct
- Environmental activism’s birth offers a template for building an attention movement
- Environmental damage has three independent root causes that all need addressing
- Ethics begins with stories, not dictates, and demands patient listening to others
- Even benign content exploits attention through relentless flow
- Every major social movement began by demanding collective attention
- Everyday communal practices of attention are living alternatives to attention extraction.
- Everyday domestic objects become weapons when oppression drives people to resistance
- Everyday gathering groups constitute schools of attention against fracking
- Everyday observation can substitute for pending scientific proof of attention harm
- Everything and everyone is being made into a standing reserve in blockchain ledgers
- Expert disagreement persists on any aspect of social-media harm data
- Expert dissent persists on social media harms despite strong evidence.
- Explicit advance pacts about gathering intentions resist attentional extraction.
- Face-to-face organizing that escapes capture constitutes resistance to the Attention Economy.
- Fitness participation grew 2,500 percent across five decades
- Formal ceremony can be engineered to re-sanctify everyday sights.
- Free, shared attention is named and offered as a transformative good.
- Funding and institutional context channel what attention science can discover
- Genuine attention is centripetal distraction, bending thoughts back
- Genuine attention is the repeated return of wandering thoughts to an object.
- Great art creates attentional situations, not just artifacts
- Haidt’s team compiled hundreds of studies documenting social media harms.
- Healthy attention feels controlled, replenishing, and non-monetizable
- Healthy human cognition is dynamic and incapable of static focus
- Healthy humans cannot sustain unwavering focus on a single object.
- High school suicide attempts and hopelessness rose 40 percent in a decade.
- Highly skilled durational attention materially builds and maintains society’s infrastructure
- Homeless people primarily wanted conversation, not books, from a street library
- Human attention has been reduced to a monoculture like American farmland
- Human attention is being extracted and commodified by an industrial-technological complex.
- Human fracking describes extracting hard-to-reach attention by industrial chemical-like force
- Human fracking extracts attentional capacities as industry once extracted physical ones.
- Human fracking parallels industrial extraction of physical labor
- Human fracking reduces persons and relationships to quantifiable commodities.
- Human reclamation asserts that people cannot be reduced to salable data.
- Human self-interest drives us to invent profit schemes heedless of lasting harm
- Humanity’s irreducible truth cannot be proven by scientific methods.
- Humans reliably develop new exploitative techniques heedless of consequences.
- Identity labels signal shared projects across wildly varied specific work
- Individual attention is low-grade ore needing massive aggregation to be profitably mined
- Individual fixes cannot solve attention extraction because the problem is structural
- Individual remedies reinforce the attention-extraction regime rather than escaping it
- Industrial attention farming displaced diverse attentional modalities with one mechanomorphic species
- Industrial attention farming originated in military-industrial screen-vigilance and cybernetics.
- Industrial attention research served military, advertising, and factory needs only
- Industrial capitalism defined workers by the very labor it extracted
- Industrial tech companies extract and commodify human attention like fracking extracts oil
- Industrial usefulness explains how one narrow attention concept colonized all domains.
- Industrialized attention extraction despoils the shared human spirit as pollution despoils water.
- Industry-funded science long obscured the smoking-cancer link despite strong early evidence
- Inherited everyday tools can be rearmed for resistance
- Inner and outer environmental damage are causally linked and inseparable
- Inner attention damage blocks the political work needed to fix outer environmental damage.
- Issues become political only when enough public attention first lands on them
- Joint attention practices generate shared political power.
- Joint attention practices open up shared political power alongside beauty and grace.
- Knowing a webcam broadcasts transforms bystanders into image-checking performers within minutes.
- Labor unions transformed industrial exploitation through collective action
- Laboratory attention research served military and advertising ends.
- Laboratory psychology definitions shaped how everyone conceives attention today.
- Laboratory-defined attention was designed for instrumental task selection from the start.
- Laypeople hold equal authority with scientists over their own attention.
- Laypeople know as much about attention as scientists do
- Legal redress treats justice as restoring balance of what was taken
- Managerial definitions reduce attention to a tool for action
- Manual-blindfold walks can restore attention to place through deliberately paced reveals
- Marx’s dialectic is a form of conceptual jiujitsu that flips thought
- Marx’s inversion reveals workers coveting their own labor in commodities
- Measuring attention as data enables treating it as a monetizable resource
- Mind-fracking and earth-fracking are parallel unregulated extraction technologies
- Mindfulness has been weaponized by employers to extract labor focus
- Modern ‘attention’ is a narrowed, instrumentalized construct far removed from lived human attention.
- Modern attention science was forged as a military-industrial discipline
- Most people equate attention with screen-based task focus
- Movement politics has always depended on formal study groups that trained collective attention.
- Museums and libraries may pivot from access to attention-sanctuary roles
- Nineteenth-century wage labor displaced chattel slavery as the most efficient exploitation nexus.
- Non-monetized radical attention vastly outnumbers fracker-engineered attention.
- Nothing about screen-based attention testing is natural or inevitable
- One historically contingent model of attention colonized all others via advertising and military uses
- Oppression’s present conditions themselves point toward the way forward
- Ordinary schooling trains the workforce that sustains the attention economy
- Original Luddites resisted industrial labor exploitation, not technology itself
- Parasitic haustoria are the biological template for the attention economy’s extraction mechanism.
- Parasitic haustoria mirror digital extraction as continuous IV-in-reverse siphons
- People accept any suffering they believe is inevitable, blocking political outrage
- Performance and Fluxus artists retroactively read as fighters against commodified attention
- Phone addiction stems from engineered infrastructure, not personal weakness
- Photographic documentation can turn automated screen absorption into a staged, noticed performance.
- Political issues only become contested once enough people attend to them
- Political visions are judged by the worlds they create, not their factual truth
- Politics itself is being reshaped by attentional extraction industries
- Precautionary action against attention extraction is warranted before causal proof arrives
- Private shame over failed willpower should be redirected into political anger
- Programmers who built manipulative interfaces can teach students to dismantle them
- Protecting outer environment depends on protecting inner psycho-sensory environment
- Pure philosophical patience does not by itself constitute a revolutionary movement
- Quantifiability is the necessary precondition for monetization
- Quantifiability is the necessary precondition for turning anything into money.
- Racist pseudoscience can hold scientific legitimacy for years within expert debate
- Radical attention is a mutual remembering that restores a thing’s innate loveliness
- Reading stands as a great mode of human attention that the frackaverse erodes.
- Rebuilding social webs is the goal, not means, of Attention Activism
- Recalling past change shatters the complacency that inevitability reinforces
- Receiving genuine care attention is a gift made precious by universal vulnerability
- Recovering the cybernetic version of attention would only refit people for task-selection
- Recreational attention activities can be reclaimed from extraction without abandoning them
- Refusing presentation of the world is not refusing the world itself
- Rehearsing past social change undermines the felt inevitability of the present
- Resistance must use the same platforms that extract attention
- Resistance to human fracking requires activism across many scales simultaneously
- Resistance to the attention economy must use the platforms themselves as tools
- Resisting attention extraction means refusing the enemy’s definition of attention
- Revolutionary change requires converting pain into politically effective outrage
- Running shoes did not exist as a consumer product before 1965
- Running, gyms, and trainers as mass middle-class practice barely existed before 1965
- Sabbath traditions and sleep are ancient attention sanctuaries
- Sanctuaries must restore non-monetizable forms of attention and a feeling of agency
- Sanctuary traditions of exclusion converted into protection for the vulnerable
- Sanctuary’s exclusionary logic of separated power paradoxically produced protection for the vulnerable
- Scales-based justice assumes all things are exchange-equal by quantity
- Scarcity alarms over oil proved wrong because fracking unlocked new supply
- School is being reframed as a study sanctuary distinct from information processing
- Schooling can be engineered to train attention for exploitation rather than liberation.
- Schooling legitimately transmits the attentional modes that let people shape their world.
- Schools are wherever focused attention is collectively learned and practiced
- Schools form attention in ways that can serve exploitation, not just freedom
- Scientific precision can block, not enable, deeper understanding of attention
- Screen culture trains us to misperceive attention as singular and task-oriented
- Screen-based training reduces attention to stimulus-poking in ordinary thought.
- Seepticised traditions gain value when reconceived as attention formation
- Self-blessing sometimes requires an external catalysing gesture of attention
- Shaming traditions like rote memorization contain valuable attention-forming practices
- Shared attentional forms are what make shared human freedom possible
- Shared attentional practices are the movement’s only real resource
- Shared world-making requires joint attention in physical co-presence
- Singular attention thinking causes concrete human harm, not just inconvenience
- Smartphone screens monopolize attention formation toward a single engineered kind
- Social movements function like controlled burns that rejuvenate democracies.
- Social participation makes contested attention truth more real over time.
- Social transformation depends on care networks plus formal mobilization structures
- Some attention’s value resists translation into any other good
- Spectator attention transforms grueling endurance events into triumphant experiences
- Static pinpoint focus is not attention but stultification
- Stiegler defines attention etymologically as waiting on infinity
- Strikes became politically powerful only with industrialization
- Study counters AI’s information dominance by centering human reflection and being
- Sustained collective silent attention can be choreographed by shared protocols
- Taking down the frackers requires recognizing attention practices already present everywhere
- Teaching developers the industry’s techniques triggered his reversal
- Technology-enabled attention extraction both creates the crisis and reveals attention’s true importance
- The ‘attention span’ concept is a historically recent, lab-derived construct.
- The activist roll call is deliberately open and invitational
- The attention activist network has remained small while its programs draw thousands
- The attention economy captures pre-existing human communities onto platforms to monetize them
- The attention economy functions as an industrial farm of vegetative users
- The attention economy has captured control of how cultures dream
- The attention economy rests on a hidden false premise about attention.
- The attention extraction industry is an enemy of all humankind
- The attention industry rests on the idea that attention can be measured and sold.
- The attention movement’s work parallels ecological restoration of erased prairies.
- The attention-versus-distraction pairing has deep roots in patriarchy and Christian devotion.
- The blindfold sash symbolizes the right to direct attention by withholding it
- The built world is made of attention as much as of materials
- The clinical ADHD test so resembles a video game it is hard to distinguish
- The clinical attention test is nearly identical to a video game.
- The commercial attention economy feeds on pre-existing civic community decline
- The diagnostic premises of attention science are cultural artifacts, not natural facts.
- The dignity-truth becomes more real as more people join the movement.
- The dispute over attention is ultimately an argument about what constitutes our humanity
- The distraction problem is not short attention spans but the instrumentalization of attention itself.
- The dominant monocultural attention is mistaken for attention itself.
- The dominant scientific definition of attention as task-selection is the foundational lie.
- The environmental activist identity is a recent invention requiring long cultural work
- The environmental movement succeeded by uniting diverse stakeholders across class lines.
- The free digital universe was produced by political decisions, not inevitability
- The group aspires for this book to catalyze change comparable to Silent Spring
- The group organized as a Quaker-inspired coalition model
- The group traced Bolsonaro’s rise to big data social media manipulation of attention
- The information and trade accounts of schooling both fail under scrutiny
- The internet could be redesigned as an attention sanctuary
- The Luddite label has a radical, pro-worker political lineage
- The meaning of any tool depends entirely on its historical moment
- The measured attention of lab science was defined by duration and person-machine coupling.
- The modern concern over short attention spans inherits a military-industrial definition of attention
- The modern measured notion of attention poorly captures lived human attention.
- The movement operates as a coalition of the willing without formal membership counting
- The movement organizes around freedom as an ever-unfolding truth rather than a fixed doctrine.
- The movement’s central truth is human infinitude, irreducible to proof or numbers.
- The prairie-to-monoculture story is the template for what industrial attention farming did.
- The pricing of mental and sensory stuff is nonsensical and unsustainable
- The rise of Bolsonaro galvanized attention activists around attention’s commodification
- The science of attention was shaped by military-industrial funding imperatives.
- The shared crisis unifies otherwise unrelated attentional practices
- The term attention has been redefined by AI researchers to mean context pruning.
- The Twelve Theses on Attention originated in a 2019 retreat.
- The world’s five largest companies all monetize captured attention
- The world’s most valuable corporations are unified by attention monetization
- Thicker communities were already dissolving before the digital attention economy arose
- TikTok outcompetes legacy nonprofits because it is better engineered for appeal
- Transnational capital is seizing human attention as its newest exploitable frontier
- Treating the immeasurable core of life as unreal is an injustice against humanity
- True attention survives only in carved-out sanctuaries, not by singular events.
- Truths that compel assent cannot sustain a freedom-based movement.
- Twentieth-century attention research served machine-monitoring practical ends.
- Twentieth-century attention science was driven by Cold War input-output thinking
- Two separate kinds of justice govern the attention movement
- Uncapturable collective gathering time constitutes resistance to the Attention Economy.
- Unchecked administrative growth and wealth produce bureaucratic iron cages and oligarchy
- Understanding cannot be outsourced to AI because it requires active study.
- Unlike Marx’s workers, the owners of attention still possess the means of producing value
- Untreated democratic rot produces citizenry convinced the system is rigged.
- Varied modern harms share a root trend of dissociation
- Visions are evaluated by the worlds they bring into being
- Waiting for proof of attention-extraction harms risks acting too late
- Weil held that highest-degree attention is identical to prayer and presupposes faith and love
- What attention is remains an actively contested political question
- Widespread attentional disorder diagnoses and device use are undisputed facts
- Window-staring is an endangered attentional species schools mislabel as distraction
- With the GATHERERS the movement answers who acts and how
- Withholding attention from one thing is what enables directing it elsewhere.
- Withholding labor only gained real power with industrialization because production then ran through machines.
- Youth suicide and hopelessness have risen sharply over ten years