Lawrence M. Friedman — A History of American Law
328 published claims from this book.
- A federal ship-passenger cap aimed at Chinese arrivals was vetoed by Hayes
- A fifth of American children worked for pay by 1900
- A half-cent milk freight reduction made landmark constitutional history.
- A lethal 1948 smog event catalyzed decades of progressively stricter federal air pollution statutes
- A national market economy inherently generates demand for national-level regulation
- A private company came to organize the entire American case-law system
- A vigilante past was no career obstacle in nineteenth-century western politics
- Abortion criminalization was partly driven by nativist fear of immigrant population growth
- Actual court practice was freer than written procedural manuals suggest
- Admiralty loss-splitting and jury-free judging paralleled covert jury tort reasoning
- Agricultural and institutional differences made most English statutes useless in South Carolina
- Ambitious educated eastern lawyers migrated west seeking fortune
- America’s adversarial civil procedure won a contested victory over informal and inquisitorial rivals.
- America’s unenforced vice laws existed because all classes wanted official morality preserved
- American distrust of judges and juries drove the explosive complexity of evidence law.
- American eugenics served as a model for Nazi Germany
- American legal literature has always been rigorously practical, not theoretical
- American negotiable instruments law was more advanced than England’s
- American officials deliberately replaced civil law with common law in Missouri
- American regulation moved historically from local to state to federal control
- American settlement was a history of dispossessing native peoples
- American states frequently replaced whole constitutions rather than amend them
- Anti-Chinese violence killed hundreds and expelled thousands from western homes
- Anti-dynastic trust law reflected market ideology, not hostility to wealth
- Anti-dynasty sentiment drove adoption of estate and inheritance taxes after 1885
- Apparent opposites in land law actually served one developmental goal
- Arid western states replaced riparian doctrine with prior appropriation water rights
- Armed labor revolts, not reform sentiment, ended convict leasing in the South
- Bankruptcy laws function as safety nets that encourage commercial risk-taking.
- Bans on local legislation were easily evaded through single-member city classes
- Bar openness coexisted with class stratification even in the nineteenth century
- Bar preparation requirements weakened across the nineteenth century
- Bar rigor campaigns mixed public interest with supply-control motives
- British ‘constructive imperialism’ strengthened London’s control but ultimately failed.
- California adopted the common law by statute in 1850 over civil-law objections
- Caveat emptor simplified commerce by discouraging litigation
- Chinese exclusion laws forced immigrants to fabricate paper families to prove citizenship.
- Clerkship apprenticeship doubled as a bar admission control device
- Cold War embarrassment and northern black migration forced the desegregation of the armed forces.
- Colfax massacre killers all went free despite federal prosecutions
- Colonial adoption of English legal doctrines was driven by local elites, not imperial fiat.
- Colonial bar admission was fragmented and colony-specific before 1776
- Colonial courts combined all government powers without separating them.
- Colonial criminal codes prioritized economically vital commodities in setting punishments
- Colonial criminal law was notably less bloodthirsty than England’s
- Colonial elite lawyers resented amateur competitors for fees and status
- Colonial indenture served as a flexible legal device far beyond labor
- Colonial land law radically simplified English doctrine
- Colonial married women used trusts to circumvent coverture’s property rules
- Colonial objections to admiralty courts were about substance, not procedure, as the Revolution proved.
- Colonial poor relief was local, stingy, and shifted costs onto newcomers through warning out
- Colonial statute borrowing made Massachusetts and Virginia legal exporters
- Colonies codified law because the uncodified common law was not packaged for export
- Colorado’s legislature retroactively ratified informal miners’ court judgments
- Commercial complexity made lawyers indispensable despite colonial hostility
- Commercial failure lost moral stigma in nineteenth-century America’s growth economy.
- Commercial law shifted from merchants to broad market participants
- Common law survived because abandoning it was practically impossible
- Common law was ideologically justified as protecting free trade
- Complex English conveyancing rules were intolerable in America’s mass land market
- Confederate reliance on printed money caused runaway inflation
- Confirming Mexican-era land titles in California took seventeen years on average
- Connecticut’s 1650 code was overwhelmingly copied from Massachusetts
- Constitutional protections failed to prevent police violence that fueled Black Lives Matter.
- Constitutional voting amendments were worthless without enforcement against southern disfranchisement.
- Continuing business relations avoided courts in favor of private settlement and arbitration
- Contract doctrine anchored both constitutional liberty theory and legal education
- Control over suffrage was the key lever of political power
- Cooley’s 1868 Constitutional Limitations was the century’s most influential book in its own time.
- Court appointees grew older as the nation matured
- Courts read charters narrowly to let new enterprises displace vested monopolies
- Courts stretched ‘in course of employment’ statutes through interpretive flexibility
- Criminal lawyers advertise because they lack repeat business
- Crises drive reactive lawmaking while slow social shifts shape law durably
- Cultural redefinition of childhood, not work itself, made child labor a social injustice
- Dissenting opinions grew rapidly across the nineteenth century
- Dower declined because protecting widows conflicted with fluid land markets
- Early American commercial law was framed as international rather than parochial
- Early American patent law balanced innovation incentives against monopoly fears
- Early and mature colonies of different regions resemble each other more than contemporaries do.
- Early child labor statutes were unenforced symbolic gestures
- Early colonies actively banned paid lawyers
- Early federal bankruptcy acts were crisis-driven and short-lived
- Early nineteenth-century Americans expected state government to actively promote economic development
- Early nineteenth-century Americans feared corporations as soulless and immortal concentrations of greed.
- Early nineteenth-century courts reassigned the jury from community law-maker to fact-finder.
- Early nineteenth-century litigants were barred from testifying in their own lawsuits.
- Early Progressives joined reform movements out of idealist conviction, not self-interest
- Early state constitutions favored legislatures because governors embodied British rule
- Eighteenth-century lawyers drew attack from both classes and crown alike
- Eighteenth-century Privy Council review was haphazard and tolerated most colonial statutory deviations.
- Elite lawyers blamed elective judiciaries for corrupt and ignorant judges
- Elites by the 1780s feared legislatures as threats to property rights
- Endorsements functioned as a private substitute for credit agencies
- England routed colonial appeals to the Privy Council, not royal courts, because politics dominated.
- English and American tort law grew independently from shared industrial causes
- Equality movements may stall but cannot reverse course entirely
- Equity’s jury-free flexibilities powered major late-nineteenth century judicial interventions.
- Eugenic hereditarian theory drove the anti-vice campaign’s scientific rationale
- Even conservative courts make decisions that expand individual rights dramatically
- Even modest income taxes can grow into transformative fiscal instruments
- Even unenforceable vice laws retained real deterrent bite through selective enforcement
- Exalting marriage as holy paradoxically raised the demand for divorce.
- Facially neutral ordinances enforced discriminatorily violate equal protection
- Failed court-packing attempts still worked as deterrence and delayed payoff
- Falling farmer influence and rising business power revived national bankruptcy law
- Farwell established that workers assumed job risks priced into their wages
- Fault-based divorce law produced collusive perjury in court
- Federal disaster relief predates the modern welfare state by over a century
- Federal law preserved some civil-law property rights during common-law expansion
- Federal surveys imposed a rectangular grid that shaped American settlement
- Federalism arguments are usually veils for substantive policy goals
- Federalism prevented any single state from resolving the divorce-law contradiction.
- Fewer than one percent of commuted homestead lands ever became homes
- Formal Jim Crow segregation laws emerged decades after Reconstruction, following custom
- Formal written jury instructions became opaque to the juries they supposedly guided.
- Forum choice between state and federal courts favored corporate defendants
- Free interstate mobility turned American states into competing sellers of laws
- Free labor united against convict labor as unfair competition
- Free northern states like Illinois erected legal barriers to black settlement
- Free speech doctrine strengthened across the twentieth century despite wartime repression
- Frontier judges avoided law questions and left decisions to juries
- Frontier lawyers subsisted chiefly on land and debt collection work
- Frontier lawyers were peripatetic, moving frequently between boomtowns
- Frontier territories evaded the requirement that they borrow preexisting state statutes wholesale.
- Germ theory expanded public demand for government health regulation
- Gilded Age courts approved professional cartels while striking labor laws
- Government growth stems from concrete group demands, not bureaucratic pathology
- Granger constitutions restricted legislatures out of fear that corporate power could buy lawmakers
- Hypertechnical procedural protections mainly served the few who could appeal, not most defendants.
- Impeachment removed corrupt New York judges in 1872
- Imprisonment for debt was abolished as economically wasteful, not only inhumane.
- In medieval England real property rights conferred political jurisdiction, not just ownership
- Independence triggered a major outburst of lawmaking in every state
- Indiana pioneered state sterilization in 1907 and many states followed
- Industrial calamities forced the creation of genuinely new tort law
- Industrial urbanization structurally compelled heavy investment in violent-crime control
- Industrialization created problems no single state could solve, forcing centralization
- Industrialization pushed big business out of regular contract litigation
- Insurance companies and contingent fees, not courts, drive auto accident resolution
- Interest-group membership functions as much to exclude outsiders as to unite insiders
- Jefferson’s list of grievances largely recycled his Virginia preamble with Massachusetts-based additions
- Jim Crow segregation extended even to the gallows and cemeteries
- Judge-made law can only change through actual litigated cases.
- Judicial opinion-writing shifted from creative grand style to formalist drabness by 1900.
- Judicial review made courts seem reactionary fortresses to labor and reformers
- Judicial review’s deterrent fear may explain American labor’s non-militancy
- Judicial review’s main effect was deterring legislation, not voiding it
- Key federal statutes responded to demands for a single national authority
- Killing a slave was not legally murder in early South Carolina
- Labor’s protective campaigns doubled as exclusionary racial and gender agendas
- Land’s dominance of national wealth made land law track the business cycle closely
- Langdell conceived law as a science whose primary sources are printed cases
- Langdell excluded even the ancient Statute of Frauds from his casebook
- Langdell replaced textbook lectures with Socratic casebook teaching
- Langdell’s curriculum excluded statutory and constitutional law as unscientific
- Langdell’s legal science was geometric deduction from cases, not empirical observation
- Langdell’s legal-science ideas made late-century legal scholarship inbred and free of social commentary.
- Large law firms came to dominate legal practice nationwide by 2000.
- Late-nineteenth-century courts functioned as a shield protecting established interests
- Late-nineteenth-century judges presented themselves as protectors of existing law rather than its builders.
- Late-nineteenth-century penal reforms shifted punishment from the offense to the offender
- Late-twentieth-century law decriminalized what Victorian vice laws had criminalized
- Law changes by layered accretion rather than revolutionary overhaul.
- Law is coextensive with society and mirrors its aims and contradictions
- Lawlessness by squatters forced Congress to legalize their claims in 1841
- Laws against sex and vice resurged strongly in late nineteenth-century America
- Lawyer unpopularity tracked the business cycle and debtor grievances
- Legal fictions once classified slaves as real estate and corporations as persons.
- Legal history is inseparable from the full history of society
- Legal structures both express and reinforce the distribution of power
- Legislative divorce vanished from American states by the late 1890s
- Literacy tests and poll taxes were written to let local officials disenfranchise black voters
- Litigation over costs batters originally simple legal concepts into intricate complexity
- Long judicial tenure occasionally left enfeebled justices deciding important cases
- Loose bar admission made law a channel of upward mobility
- Many small municipalities function as exclusionary wealth enclaves
- Married women’s property acts were a quiet change about external family economics
- Mass markets forced consumers to trust unseen strangers and corporations
- Migratory divorce mills moved from state to state as each tightened its laws.
- Most American law remains state law despite federal growth
- Most injured industrial workers received no compensation under nineteenth-century tort law
- Muller v. Oregon upheld sex-based hours limits on maternalist grounds
- Negotiability lets good-faith buyers take title free of prior claims
- New York never adopted Field’s proposed civil code despite decades of advocacy.
- New York’s feudal manors survived until the mid-nineteenth century
- Nineteenth-century chroniclers mythologized vigilantes as folk democracy and heroic surgeons of the body politic
- Nineteenth-century contract law expanded to serve the new market economy.
- Nineteenth-century county jails were filthier and more corrupting than state prisons
- Nineteenth-century courts let condemnors offset land-taking compensation against expected project benefits
- Nineteenth-century law schools were loosely tied to universities and required no college degree
- Nineteenth-century police functioned as municipal strikebreakers for management
- Nineteenth-century public generosity went only to blameless suffering groups
- No formula ever settled how states could apportion interstate business for taxation
- Obsolete common-law doctrines lingered for centuries rather than being abolished openly.
- Occupational licensing laws mainly served organized trades’ economic self-interest.
- Only export-protecting food bills passed before 1906
- Only two American colonies elected their own governors before independence
- Open interest-group politics rewarded organized voices while poor law stayed backward and cruel
- Organized crime predated and outlived Prohibition, which did not create it
- Pioneers conducted formal trials even beyond reach of any court
- Plessy’s majority dismissed segregation’s meaning as black misperception
- Police power let states regulate contracts for health, safety, or morality
- Popular legal treatises were continued after their authors died as valuable publisher brand names.
- Post-1837 state governments barred themselves from owning corporate stock and lending credit
- Post-Reconstruction white supremacy nearly eliminated black lawyers from the bar
- Printed reports let each state craft and borrow its own common law
- Prior appropriation doctrine subsidized industry by letting water be taken free
- Private title-insurance companies arose because public land records could not cope with volume
- Pro-enterprise tort rules reflected broad consensus rather than judicial conspiracy
- Professional civil-service experts acted as reform agents
- Professional ethics codes partly serve elite bar interests as anticompetitive rules.
- Progressive-era immigration law expressly excluded the diseased, criminal, illiterate, and Asiatic.
- Protective labor laws could cost women their jobs rather than help them
- Public housing lost middle-class support once it became poor-only housing
- Public opinion about railroads reversed from enthusiasm to fear within one generation
- Published case reports were justified as checks limiting judicial discretion
- Puerto Rico remains a constitutional limbo neither state nor colony
- Quitrents failed in America because land was abundant
- Railroad receiverships let federal judges suppress strikes through contempt power.
- Reconstruction-era southern states temporarily reversed the elective-judge trend
- Reform succeeded only where conscience aligned with self-interest
- Regulatory agencies drift toward the interests of the firms they regulate
- Regulatory crimes emerged to solve diffuse-harm enforcement problems no private litigant would pursue.
- Regulatory crimes served as cheap administrative enforcement for business regulation
- Regulatory laws took criminal form because private suits were impractical
- Religious prejudice in Supreme Court appointments collapsed completely within a century
- Reported appellate decisions vastly overstate how courts actually handled slave cases
- Reported case volumes began appearing in American states only after 1789
- Revolutionary-era lawyers led both sides of the political divide
- Rising divorce reflected bourgeois demand for formal record-keeping
- Rising racism in slave codes progressively degraded free blacks to near-slave status
- San Quentin’s chief surgeon experimented with testicular transplants on prisoners
- Separate-but-equal graduate schools failed because hastily created black institutions were never truly equal.
- Several northern states abolished the death penalty by the 1880s.
- Shared experience, not formal machinery, kept state laws from diverging into separate languages
- Shared social forces, not imitation, drove many liberation movements
- Single-subject clauses served open government but mainly armed judges
- South Carolina executed 296 slaves between 1800 and 1855
- South Carolina legally enslaved free black sailors entering its ports
- Southern constitutional disenfranchisement followed the retreat of federal racial-justice will
- Southern convict-leasing camps killed convicts at catastrophic rates
- Southern courts openly declared slaves outside the protection of common law
- Southern law did not protect enslaved families from forced separation by sale
- Southern secession removed the congressional opposition blocking free-land homestead legislation
- Southern slavery was a culture and social order, not only an economic system
- State and local administrative agencies long preceded the federal ICC
- State competition for business prevented progressive labor legislation before federal control
- State constitutions changed wholesale as public opinion shifted
- State court judicial review exploded from rare to common between 1850 and 1900
- State courts struck down debt-relief statutes to protect investment over indebted farmers
- State governments chartered corporate private police armies to crush organized labor
- State governments shifted power from legislatures to executives and courts over time
- Statehood produced legal continuity, not breakage, across the West
- States initially justified owning corporate stock on public-works and control grounds.
- States regulated insurance because federal government never did
- States weaponize legal difference to attract commerce as a wealth source
- States-rights arguments in Congress blocked federal anti-lynching legislation.
- Student control of law reviews originated early and has never been challenged
- Sunday-closing laws were backed by labor unions seeking a shorter workweek
- Supreme Court prestige rose steadily despite raw political appointment fights
- Supreme Court unanimity collapsed from near-total to under a quarter of decisions
- Technical state constitutional clauses gave state courts their main striking tools
- Temperance crusades enforced Protestant middle-class cultural dominance over Catholic immigrant working classes
- Tenement housing laws could not overcome underlying urban poverty
- Territorial judges, unlike federal judges, served short terms and could be fired at will
- Territorial legislatures inherited statutes useless to their local conditions
- The 1648 Laws and Liberties was an alphabetical compilation rather than a systematic code
- The 1837 depression turned states against direct railroad investment.
- The 1837 panic reversed state investment in railroads and forced privatization.
- The 1841 bankruptcy act let anyone self-file yet restricted forced filings to merchants.
- The 1841 bankruptcy act mainly discharged debts with creditors recovering pennies on the dollar.
- The 1898 bankruptcy act was debtor-favorable and proved permanent
- The 1937 Elixir Sulfanilamide deaths created the modern FDA pre-approval requirement for new drugs
- The 1942 Coconut Grove fire yielded about $160 per victim despite 491 deaths
- The automobile generated the most familiar and most violated branch of law
- The case method taught one national common law by ignoring state-law diversity
- The Court eagerly broadened the Mann Act beyond its white-slavery purpose
- The fault principle shielded industry from full liability to spare capital
- The federal government grew seven-thousandfold in budget and fourteenfold in employees
- The GI Bill opened elite law schools to talented veterans regardless of class.
- The Harvard case method conquered American law teaching nationwide by 1903.
- The Homestead Act marked the end of using public land to raise federal revenue
- The Homestead Act never delivered free land to ordinary settlers
- The late-1800s trust scare concerned concentrated power, not legal form.
- The law merchant, absorbed from merchant courts, gave common law its commercial document doctrines.
- The lawyer population exploded tenfold relative to population after the Revolution
- The Mann Act became a weapon for racist and blackmail purposes
- The market for legal services disciplined entry when formal bar strictures collapsed
- The NAACP adopted federal litigation because every other political avenue was closed.
- The Negotiable Instruments Law achieved near-universal state adoption before the UCC replaced it
- The organized bar proved cowardly in crises despite its aggressive rhetoric about professional honor.
- The parol-evidence rule made written documents’ plain words bar contradicting oral promises.
- The practice of law shifted from courtroom litigation to transactional work
- The privacy tort began as a scholarly proposal adopted later by courts
- The Restatements descended from the codification movement yet were never binding law
- The Revolutionary generation knew judges made law through their ideology
- The silent penitentiary system collapsed from cost and overcrowding.
- The single-subject clause has voided dozens of state statutes
- The state compensated masters for executed slaves to prevent concealment of slave crime
- The statute of frauds survived as functional, not empty, formality
- The Supreme Court held that Congress lacked constitutional power over trademarks in 1879
- The Supreme Court sanctioned labor injunctions in the 1895 Debs case.
- The Thaw case made claimed seduction of young women a legal trial narrative
- The three-year law degree began at Harvard in the 1870s
- The United States overtook Britain in patent grants by 1807
- The western frontier originated lasting legal innovations that later spread east
- Thin legal libraries made frontier court law both freewheeling and archaic
- Title doctrine in sales law quietly favored sellers over buyers
- Towns litigated each other over pauper settlement to avoid paying relief costs
- Treatise authors and courts mutually reinforced each other through reciprocal citation
- Trials served as public entertainment before broadcast media existed
- Ultra vires doctrine collapsed because it hindered corporate flexibility
- Urbanization drove executions out of public view into prisons
- Utopian and godly colonial ideals structurally rejected lawyer mediation
- Vagrancy laws effectively criminalized male unemployment and homelessness
- Vice-admiralty courts spread through crown colonies from 1696 onward and tried cases without juries.
- Victorian America criminalized only public, notorious sin rather than private vice
- Victorian marriage norms structurally created a male demand prostitution filled
- Vigilante justice enforced elite moral codes rather than neutral popular will
- Wagon-train travelers obeyed law because courts awaited them at both ends
- Wealthy interests financed a staged lawsuit against the income tax
- Welfare benefits once granted to masses become politically irreversible
- Western codification changed legal practice surprisingly little once enacted
- Western lawyers pursued politics, land, and litigation as fortune routes
- Western states relaxed usury law to attract money for cheap land
- Widespread private land ownership shaped all American law
- Without national health insurance, welfare functions get absorbed piecemeal into existing institutions