Even unenforceable vice laws retained real deterrent bite through selective enforcement

Evidence

But conformity in behavior, as well as on paper? If millions of high-​minded people condemned brothels and saloons, other millions (openly and not so openly) were eager customers. It was one thing to pass laws about morality; enforcement was quite another. Theodore Roosevelt’s failure in New York was one of many defeats, then and later. The reader in the twenty-​first century does not have to be told that crusades against vice never quite succeed; all the Prohibitions, of whatever stamp, have tasted the bitter fruit of failure. Vice is hydra-​headed: chop off one head, another grows back. On the other hand, even “unenforceable” laws are never uniformly unenforced. A symbol loses power when it is only a symbol and nothing more. But vice laws and laws against victimless crime in general were never purely symbolic. They meant something. They had some bite, at least at particular times and places. Who knows how many people avoided, say, brothels, because they were afraid of a possible raid or a crackdown, or because of a sense of shame? — Lawrence M. Friedman, A History of American Law, 3360

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Equal operation of law prevents officials escaping political backlash through selective enforcement. — Henry M. Hart, Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in…, 202; Nineteenth-century vice laws against adultery went largely unenforced in practice — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law: An Introduction, 817; America’s unenforced vice laws existed because all classes wanted official morality preserved — Lawrence M. Friedman, A History of American Law, 3335 (+9 more)

Broader Connections