Inclusive authoritarian legacies reduce zero-sum ethnic politics during democratic transitions

Evidence

More inclusionary regimes faced transition to multiparty politics with less competitive, antagonistic, and divisive patterns of interethnic relations both at the elite and communal levels. They were thus less likely to experience electoral violence. The opportunity structure engendered by authoritarian rule created more options for elites to forge cross-ethnic coalitions, as well as different incentives for intragroup mobilization. Specifically, the absence of blatant discrimination of certain groups reduced zero-sum perceptions of politics and opened up for interethnic elite negotiation. — Johan Brosché and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of…, 38

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly bears on the reader’s research question — this is the mechanism by which threatened-privilege mobilization (here the obverse: absence of blatant discrimination defusing it) is tied to the regime type’s opportunity structure. — connects to: Authoritarian regimes’ breadth of ethnic inclusion shapes post-transition electoral violence risk. — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of…, 10; Authoritarian-era institutional choices can shape political behavior after democratic openings. — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of…, 13; African ruling coalitions nearly always include some ethno-regional intermediaries, but inclusion depth varies — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of…, 23 (+14 more)

Broader Connections