Authoritarian-era rhetoric norms constrain whether elites can later mobilize voters through ethnic hostility.

Evidence

Second, political legacies place constraints on electoral mobilization. Specifically, more exclusionary ruling coalitions create ethno-political dynamics where narratives exploiting ethnic cleavages become a powerful mode of political mobilization for elites in the pursuit of electoral gains. LeBas (2006: 422) notes how ‘political incentives must align with existing identities, rather than encourage the formation of identities that transcend them’. Polarization and group boundaries are upheld and reproduced by political elites and create situations where space for bargaining shrinks (McAdam, Tarrow & Tilly, 2001). In Kenya, the electoral rhetoric played on historical injustices and ethnic divisions, and the violence served both to solidify the incumbent’s support base and to punish opposition voters. In Zambia, the use of an ethnically hostile rhetoric would have signalled a break from the rhetoric used during authoritarian rule. — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of
, 97

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Authoritarian regimes’ breadth of ethnic inclusion shapes post-transition electoral violence risk. — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of
, 10; Inclusive versus exclusive authoritarian ruling coalitions shape electoral violence risk. — Johan BroschĂ© and Hanne Fjelde and Kristine Höglund, Electoral violence and the legacy of
, 94; Openly racist political newcomers must temper their appeal to attract high authoritarians — Bob Altemeyer, The Authoritarian Specter, 4423 (+3 more)

Broader Connections