The racialized content of the Muslim category persisted across changing labels

Evidence

It is important to remember, for example, that ‘Muslims’ in post-war Britain were configured as ‘coloured’, then ‘black’, then ‘Asian’, then ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Bangladeshi’ before they appeared as ‘Muslims’ (Alexander 1998, 2002) – and while the labels may have changed, the racist content of the category largely did not. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 163

Categorization

  • XREF: Empirical support for the racialization thesis — the category’s racial continuity across labels is exactly what Bleich’s neutral definition would miss. — connects to: Racism operates through biological and cultural registers that reinforce each other; British racial categories for Muslims changed labels while retaining racist content. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 168; Anti-Muslim stereotypes recycle older racialized images of black and Asian youth across decades. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 169 (+23 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 163

Broader Connections