The 1997 report already linked anti-Muslim violence to racialised prejudice

Evidence

The Commission notes a particularly dramatic aspect of social exclusion, the vulnerability of Muslims to physical violence and harassment. Their essential point is that whatever the motivations of racist attackers may be, the consequence of this kind of violence for Muslims is that they are unable to play a full part in mainstream society. Racial violence is all of a piece therefore with anti-Muslim prejudice. The key recommendation is that this must be explicitly recognised in whatever new legislation may be introduced. A legal term such as ‘religious and racial violence’ is required. The term ‘racial violence’ is no longer adequate on its own. — Runnymede Trust, Islamophobia, 28

Categorization

  • XREF: Evidence that the 2017 racialization turn (‘anti-Muslim racism’) was already latent in the original report — relevant to narrating the shift the reader is mapping. — connects to: The report pressed governments to treat religion like race in equality policy — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 745; The 1997 Runnymede report defined Islamophobia as faith-based discrimination beyond ethnicity — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 185; Anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim attitudes are distinct but overlapping targets of prejudice (+3 more)

Broader Connections