Islamophobia requires an acknowledged Muslim or Islamic element to be identified.

Evidence

As a consequence of this, exclusionary practices – practices that disadvantage, prejudice or discriminate against Muslims and Islam in social, economic and political spheres ensue, including the subjection to violence – are in evidence. For such to be Islamophobia however, an acknowledged ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islamic’ element – either explicit or implicit, overtly expressed or covertly hidden, or merely even nuanced through meanings that are ‘theological’, ‘social’, ‘cultural’, ‘racial’ and so on, that at times never even necessarily name or identify ‘Muslims’ or ‘Islam’ – must be present. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 911

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sets the boundary criterion distinguishing Islamophobia from generic exclusion — the required Muslim/Islamic referent.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s central contest over whether Islamophobia is race-based (Runnymede 2017) or meaning-based (Allen) — Allen allows racial meanings but centers a looser Muslim/Islamic element. — connects to: Islamophobic presumption attaches to anyone perceived as Muslim, regardless of belief or practice. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 473; Islamophobia analysis must center Muslim agency and recognition, not mere Othering. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 584; Muslim identity cannot be reduced to religion alone — Fred Halliday, ‘Islamophobia’ Reconsidered, 43 (+7 more)

Broader Connections