Islamophobic presumption attaches to anyone perceived as Muslim, regardless of belief or practice.

Evidence

As a non-practising Muslim, I also hear non-Muslims loosen their tongues about Muslims, asking me as a part-insider about what I really think about Muslims, and if they (i.e. Muslims) really think or do various terrible things. They assume I share their identity and sympathize with their arguments about Muslims. … Once, after giving a work presentation, which didn’t even address religion or Muslims, the first question from the audience was ‘what is your view on female genital mutilation?’ I was initially baffled by the question, but then I realized I was being asked whether as a Muslim I supported it, and that this was viewed as a reasonable and justifiable question following a presentation that had nothing to do with such issues. … This sort of thing has happened on a few occasions but, in general, secular Muslims like me don’t have the same intensity of Islamophobia compared to more obviously practising Muslims. But it also shows how no matter what a Muslim actually says or thinks, including whether or not we practise or believe in any religion, we are still always vulnerable to Islamophobic presumptions about Muslims. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 473

This sort of thing has happened on a few occasions but, in general, secular Muslims like me don’t have the same intensity of Islamophobia compared to more obviously practising Muslims. But it also shows how no matter what a Muslim actually says or thinks, including whether or not we practise or believe in any religion, we are still always vulnerable to Islamophobic presumptions about Muslims. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 468

Categorization

  • SHARE: The FGM-as-first-question anecdote is a painfully vivid concrete instance of presumptive guilt based on category membership — worth sharing with anyone writing about everyday microaggressions.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s own framework debate: the passage demonstrates that Islamophobia as a category operates on ascribed identity, not belief, which bears on Bleich’s ‘attitudes’ definition and its elision of how the target is racialized rather than believed. — connects to: A presumption of guilt until proven innocent defines Islamophobia — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 281; Islamophobia is the meaning disseminated about Muslims and Islam rather than any single act — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 818; Islamophobia materially harms real lives regardless of how temporary the trend is. (+9 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: This is the core definitional move: the secular Muslim’s testimony shows the attitude-measuring approach fails because the presumed attribute (religious belief/practice) plays no role in who gets targeted — the marker is racialized identity.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 473; Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 468

Broader Connections