Islamophobia operates through shared cultural meaning-making structures that predate any current event

Evidence

As regards the first, what is established about that ‘certain identifiable phenomenon’ is that it employs a multitude of products through which meaning about ‘Muslims’ and ‘Islam’ is disseminated and through which both are identified, irrespective of whether such products and their disseminative meanings are true or untrue, accurate or inaccurate, discriminate or indiscriminate. Such products can be either separate or interlinked, acquiring myriad forms that incorporate the visual, verbal, linguistic, textual, representational and associative, functioning at times without necessarily even being expressly focused upon Muslims or Islam, or even identifying them directly but instead providing meaning through the shared languages and conceptual maps that already exist in the public and private spaces across the different social strata: shaped not only by contemporary interactions and events but also by historical and atavistic myths and legacies, whether real or imaginary, that reinforce, reinvigorate and re-awaken both passive and active meanings. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 900

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines Islamophobic products as meaning-bearing forms functioning through ‘shared languages and conceptual maps’ regardless of accuracy.
  • XREF: connects to: Islamophobic content has shifted from crude cartoons to globally shared narratives and institutional suspicion. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 86; Islamophobia functions as an alibi for contemporary race-making — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us
, 173; Global events normalized Islamophobic discourse and made Muslims the ultimate Other — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us
, 255 (+14 more)

Broader Connections