Visible Muslim identity increases vulnerability to hate crime victimization.

Evidence

Research has shown that in most cases, the victims of Islamophobic hate crimes are wearing traditional Islamic clothing at the time of the incident, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly white male (Awan 2016, Littler and Feldman 2015). Muslims, particularly those with a ‘visible’ Muslim identity, are therefore more vulnerable to anti-Muslim hostility, intimidation, abuse and threats of violence. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 360

Research has shown that in most cases, the victims of Islamophobic hate crimes are wearing traditional Islamic clothing at the time of the incident, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly white male (Awan 2016, Littler and Feldman 2015). Muslims, particularly those with a ‘visible’ Muslim identity, are therefore more vulnerable to anti-Muslim hostility, intimidation, abuse and threats of violence. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 355

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the visibility marker theme: how dress and appearance signal group membership, echoing work on racialized visibility and to the reader’s own work on visible markers. — connects to: Anti-Muslim attacks target visibly identifiable markers like the hijab. — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 44; Anti-Muslim hate crime harms target victims’ intrinsic identity and reach the whole Muslim community — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 366; Visual markers of Muslim identity are treated as interchangeable signs of threat — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 452 (+7 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 360; Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 355

Broader Connections