Conflict situations are essentially bargaining situations

Evidence

To study the strategy of conflict is to take the view that most conflict situations are essentially bargaining situations. They are situations in which the ability of one participant to gain his ends is dependent to an important degree on the choices or decisions that the other participant will make. — Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 21

Categorization

  • XREF: The foundational framing that lets the reader cast Bonasera’s plea and the Godfather’s arbitration as tacit bargaining between parties whose mutual dependence structures the deal — and the hostage-like ‘Godfather bond’ as the commitment mechanism. — connects to: Bargaining situations are imperfect-correlation-of-preferences games — Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 213; Commitment converts an indeterminate bargaining situation into a determinate two-move game — Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 289; Anger deters aggression and seeks bargaining power rather than fairness. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 661 (+3 more)

Broader Connections