Anger deters aggression and seeks bargaining power rather than fairness.

Evidence

Similarly, anger (discussed by Cova et al.) – as opposed to outrage – may contradict morality. This is the case, for instance, when people are angry at infants for crying too much or at animals for being dirty. Anger is an ancient psychological mechanism, present in many nonhuman species (Clutton-Brock & Parker 1995), that does not aim at being fair but, mainly, at deterring future aggressions (McCullough et al. 2010) and at using physical force to coerce or to obtain a better bargaining position (Sell et al. 2009). — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 661

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Separates anger (ancient, coercive, non-moral) from outrage (moralized), a useful conceptual distinction.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s framework on how moral emotions are engineered in high-stakes environments. — connects to: Moral emotions are dominated by punitive anger, not avoidance — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 346; Deriving fairness from bargaining power threatens to reduce moral norms to mere bargaining. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 623; Mutualistic anthropology explains moral anger as an evolved fairness-restoring mechanism — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 354 (+3 more)

Broader Connections