Shared identity turns crowds from irrational mobs into solidarity-based adaptive resources

Evidence

There are dangers in groups. The attempt to stay with others and act collectively may slow the individual down and even impede crowd flow; and some group norms can be dangerous. Yet, usually in these situations, groupness confers benefits and individualism increases risk. The more that everyone in a crowd acts as an individual, the more likely it is that exits will be blocked as people fail to coordinate (Mintz, 1951). In liberating us from the restrictions of individuality (Turner et al., 1987), shared social identity in a crowd can therefore be a crucial adaptive resource. Mass emergencies happen to crowds and in crowds. They can also create crowds. These crowds have in the past been seen as conduits of irrationality. Recent research suggests that, through sharing social identity, crowds do indeed act as conduits – for shared emotions, cognitions, and behaviours that can be described as forms of solidarity. In the context of an emergency, these solidarity behaviours can contribute to collective self-organisation and hence to safety, survival, and wellbeing. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 164

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly overturns the classic Le Bon ‘irrational crowd’ tradition that the solidarity-via-emergency literature positions against. — connects to: Crowd identification predicts helping and reduces pushing in evacuation simulations. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 56; Shared identity in crowds produces solidarity and expected mutual support. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 104; Shared identity with a crowd converts density from threat into safety — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 150 (+13 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: flagged by the selector, no supporting note recorded

Broader Connections