Shared identity with a crowd increases helping and decreases pushing others aside.

Evidence

In one study (N = 72), we randomly assigned student participants to low vs. high shared identification conditions. In the low-identification condition, we asked participants to think of themselves in terms of their personal identity and we described the crowd in the simulation as ā€œtourists, shoppers, and commutersā€, in the high-identification condition, we asked participants to think of themselves in terms of their identity as students and we described the crowd as ā€œfellow studentsā€. However, our manipulation checks found that levels of identification with the crowd were close to the scale mid-point across conditions – possibly because the manipulation was not engaging enough – which meant that we could not test for group differences. Nevertheless, regression analyses showed that identification with the crowd predicted the number of helping behaviours and (negatively) the number of times other characters were pushed aside, in line with the social identity explanation. In addition, concern for others mediated the relationship between social identification and helping behaviour. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 56

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to classic emergency bystander literature (LatanĆ© & Darley) and its reworking by Drury’s social identity model of crowd behaviour. — connects to: Shared fate in danger makes strangers act as one group offering help. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 47; People act together because shared identity lets each expect others will join — John Drury and Rupert Brown and Roberto GonzĆ”lez and Daniel Miranda, Emergent social identity and observing…, 130; Shared identity generates expectations of support and trust among group members — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 16 (+12 more)
  • corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 56

Broader Connections