Existing social bonds do not always explain emergency collective behaviour

Evidence

However, while there is much evidence that existing social bonds are important in shaping behaviour in crowds (and communities) in emergencies, such social bonds are not always necessary to explain collective behaviour. In many major incidents, the crowd comprises strangers as well as affiliates, yet still there is evidence of widespread helping and other forms of social coordination among these strangers (Clarke, 2002). There is also substantial evidence to suggest that, as well as existing relationships structuring behaviour, new relationships are formed within emergencies, based on the common experience of the emergency itself. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 42

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharpens the boundary between social-capital/existing-bond accounts and emergent-identity accounts of solidarity.
  • XREF: connects to: Mass emergency behaviour stems from social identity, not panic or irrationality — John Drury and Chris Cocking and Steve Reicher, Everyone for themselves? A comparative…, 122; Pre-disaster social bonds cannot explain solidarity among strangers during crises. — John Drury and Evangelos Ntontis, A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF COLLECTIVE…, 15; Shared emergent identity from common fate explains collective support amid disasters — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 15 (+6 more)

Broader Connections