Islamophobia flourishes on both the nativist right and among self-proclaimed liberals

Evidence

On the one side there is the nativist sentiment that immigration undermines social cohesion and erodes our sense of national identity. Islam, in particular, elicits such fear. Many view Islam through the lens of the ‘clash of civilizations’, a perspective that leads politicians and commentators – not just on the right but self-proclaimed liberals too – towards deeply illiberal arguments: insisting, for instance, that Muslim immigration must be limited, or that racial profiling is necessary in the ‘war on terror’, or that it is not possible to be racist against Muslims because Muslims are not a ‘race’. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 689

Categorization

  • XREF: The ‘clash of civilizations’ framing and the ‘Muslims aren’t a race so can’t face racism’ argument mark this as squarely inside the Runnymede/anti-Muslim-racism camp in the definitional debate, directly opposed to Bleich’s neutral concept-formation. — connects to: Liberal and far-right Islamophobia converge on gender rights claims against Muslim culture — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 560; Liberal gatekeeping defines authentic Muslim identity from outside — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 667; Islamophobia includes polite liberal variants, not only conservative conspiracy theories — Carl W. Ernst, Islamophobia in America_ The Anatomy of…, 48 (+15 more)

Broader Connections