US Islamophobia has liberal and conservative wings, both imperial

Evidence

I argue that differences both in rhetoric as well as policy, such as whether to accommodate or confront, have led to different forms of Islamophobia—liberal and conservative. Both are imperial forms of racism. This chapter and the next shed light on how empire is a process. To secure its interests, the United States constantly shifts strategy and tactics. Thus, while Iraq was obliterated in the name of 9/11, Saudi Arabia was not touched even though fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were of Saudi origin. Imperial racism is strategic and purposeful, hence “good” and “bad” Muslims. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 380

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly corroborates the Mamdani ‘good Muslim/bad Muslim’ thesis and Kumar’s own earlier chapter on imperial ethnocentric racism; dialogues with Rana’s ‘fitna/pre-modern’ framing. — connects to: Liberal Islamophobia includes Muslims only on imperial terms — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 89; Islamophobia spans liberal and conservative mainstreams, not just the fringe right — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 91; Islamophobia networks are structurally integral to US empire — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 89 (+18 more)
  • SEED: The Saudi-Iraq asymmetry after 9/11 is a sharp, concrete hook for an essay on how state Islamophobia targets geopolitical rivals, not actually dangerous actors.

Broader Connections