Culturalist framing of Islam enables respectable liberal Islamophobia

Evidence

Positioning Muslims/Islam as a chosen/assumed identity seemingly ascribes an element of volition, of choice, which seemingly removes them from the status of victim. Similarly, the recourse to ‘Muslim culture’ places the focus on beliefs and practices as distinct from Muslims themselves; it is here that what Sayeeda Warsi terms the acceptability of liberal ‘dinner-table’ Islamophobia (BBC News 2011) finds its alibi. At the same time, and paradoxically, ‘culture’ assumes a collective foundation, which works to homogenize all Muslims, erasing differences in ethnicity, nationality, migrant history, legal status, socioeconomic positioning, religious practice or belief, location, gender, sexuality and so on. ‘Culture’ is lifted outside of its historical and social context, and assumed to be unchanging, anachronistic and, most usually, antagonistic to the ‘modern’ west. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 167

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Unpacks Warsi’s ‘dinner-table Islamophobia’ — the respectable, liberal alibi for prejudice against Muslims.
  • XREF: Connects to the cultural racism literature (Gilroy, Balibar) and to the immodesty moral panics piece on how cultural dress-coding does racializing work — same mechanism of ‘culture’ as alibi. — connects to: Liberal and far-right Islamophobia converge on gender rights claims against Muslim culture — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 560; Liberal gatekeeping defines authentic Muslim identity from outside — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 667; Islamophobia flourishes on both the nativist right and among self-proclaimed liberals — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 689 (+21 more)

Broader Connections