The clash-of-civilizations lens drives even liberals toward illiberal anti-Muslim policies

Evidence

But the very thing that is valuable about diversity – the cultural and ideological clashes that it brings about – is precisely what many fear. That fear can take two forms. On the one side there is the nativist sentiment that immigration undermines social cohesion and erodes our sense of national identity. Islam, in particular, elicits such fear. Many view Islam through the lens of the ‘clash of civilizations’, a perspective that leads politicians and commentators – not just on the right but self-proclaimed liberals too – towards deeply illiberal arguments: insisting, for instance, that Muslim immigration must be limited, or that racial profiling is necessary in the ‘war on terror’, or that it is not possible to be racist against Muslims because Muslims are not a ‘race’. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 684

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly engages Huntington’s clash of civilizations thesis, the rival framing the reader is mapping against Runnymede’s open/closed views model. — connects to: Domestic anti-Muslim campaigns needed liberal commentary to reach the mainstream — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 497; Anti-terror and immigration policies become conflated in framing Muslims as foreign enemies — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 580; Anti-Muslim sentiment spans opposing political groups, not just white conservatives (+12 more)

Broader Connections