Parallel racialization logics target Jews and Muslims across eras.

Evidence

One illustration of this in Britain is how during the First World War the status of the new Russian Jewish immigrants, in contrast to long-established groups, was problematized because they were not naturalized and could not therefore be conscripted. This was compounded by these refugees’ principled opposition to aligning themselves with a Czarist Russia responsible for the pogroms; paradoxically at a time when public discourse widely held that Russian socialism was the ideology of ‘the Jews’. In the contemporary period, we find that the ‘good Muslim/bad Muslim’dichotomy has achieved significant traction, especially in the ways with which boundaries of legitimate and illegitimate Muslim political descent are drawn (Mamdani 2004). These two logics of racialization are presented as enduring in Simon Weaver’s study of virtual humour (this issue). In his account, Weaver argues that logics of inclusive racialization usually employ racial stereotypes, whereas exclusion often depicts violence or removal. Drilling deeper still, Weaver shows that while the stereotypes and exclusions of Jews and Muslims presented in the humour under study are not the same, having both different histories and different trajectories, he nonetheless argues that the underlying logic of racialization is the same (and can be split into inclusive and exclusionary jokes, the former using stereotypes solely while the latter show death or removal). In his reading, anti-Muslim jokes are more active as a form of racism; they rely on contemporary events and stereotypes. In his discourse analysis, antisemitic and Islamophobic jokes are constructed through linguistic devices that resemble metaphor and other rhetorical manoeuvres, in a manner that enables humour to racialize in various scenarios. — Nasar Meer, Racialization and Religion, 40

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the essay on complaints about immodesty going way back — both trace how moral/identity panics recur across eras with different targets but parallel structures. — connects to: Crusade rhetoric racialized Muslims as a vile and accursed race. — Nasar Meer, Racialization and Religion: Race,…, 12; Race was co-constituted with religion in European history. — Nasar Meer, Racialization and Religion: Race,…, 31; Jewish racialization varies with historical stability and splits along West-East rather than unified lines — Nasar Meer, Racialization and Religion: Race,…, 39 (+18 more)
  • DEFINE: Weaver’s inclusive vs. exclusionary racialization distinction (stereotypes-only vs. death/removal) is a crisp analytical framework worth remembering.
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections