Muslim women are disproportionately targeted because hijabs make them most visibly Muslim

Evidence

It is no surprise therefore that when these visual identifiers held such primacy in determining who or what became the targets for discrimination, abuse, violence and aggression, that it was Muslim women in particular – possibly the most visually identifiable religious adherents in contemporary Europe – who became the primary foci for retaliation. So for example, the report stated that Islamophobic incidents were identified in Denmark where a Muslim woman was thrown from a moving taxi; in Germany, where Muslim women had their hijabs torn from their heads; and in Italy where a bus driver repeatedly shut a Muslim woman in the bus’ doors much to the amusement of an on-looking and cheering crowd. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 555

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the modesty/complaints-about-immodesty moral panic material and to how dress functions as a visibility marker of out-group status. — connects to: Anti-Muslim attacks target visibly identifiable markers like the hijab. — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 44; Wearing the hijab shifts how Muslim women are racially perceived and treated; The hijab rather than skin tone triggers racializing surveillance of Muslim women — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 292 (+7 more)
  • SHARE: The detail that crowds cheered a bus driver repeatedly shutting a Muslim woman in doors is a stark concrete instance worth sharing with anyone studying bystander complicity.

Broader Connections