The hijab rather than skin tone triggers racializing surveillance of Muslim women

Evidence

The surveillance of beauty is another way that Muslim American women who wear the hijab are surveilled for their cultural practices. Whiteness has become a marker of beauty and privilege both in the United States as well as in countries that make up the southern hemisphere, such as India (Hunter 2011). This is evidenced by the increased interest and use of skin lightening creams both in the United States and internationally. Hunter (2011) refers to “racial capital” as a material benefit people possess based on their skin tone. In a racialized society, the lighter one’s skin tone, the more access one has to economic resources such as jobs or social networks (Glenn 2009; Hunter 2011). Muslim women who wear the hijab were told wearing it made them ugly; they are also racialized for their beauty. — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 292

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces Hunter’s concept of ‘racial capital’ — a key definitional anchor showing how beauty/skin tone operates as a racializing mechanism for hijabi women.
  • QUESTION: The beauty dimension suggests women’s racialization runs through aesthetic judgment — worth chasing how this interacts with the gendered surveillance Selod documents elsewhere.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 292
  • XREF: connects to: Modern surveillance is structured by anti-Blackness — , The Braided Reading EPUB: 5-Year…, 2569; Western discourse displaces Muslim threats onto obsessing over women’s clothing — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 356; Racial identity shapes whether the same clothing provokes bans — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 381 (+49 more)

Broader Connections