Even anti-Islamophobic Muslim novels indirectly accept the frame they oppose.

Related

• Literature resists Islamophobic universalism by structuring feeling and imagining alternative experiences (similarity 0.89)
• Individual Muslim writers are not trapped by the interpretive frame that dominates their reception (similarity 0.89)
• Islamophobic claims serve to positively define their speakers rather than describe Muslims (similarity 0.88)
• Medieval writers classified Muslim followers as monstrous races and devil minions. (similarity 0.86)
• A Muslim character’s refusal to explain can be a political contestation, not mere rigidity (similarity 0.85)
• Fiction contests Islamophobia either by direct Islamic subjectivity or by oblique readerly defamiliarization. (similarity 0.85)
• Arabist and Islamic studies resisted the revision that reformed other area studies (similarity 0.85)
• Global fiction contests Islamophobia by refusing the clash-of-civilizations model (similarity 0.85)
• Dominant frames of understanding constrain reception, not Muslim authors’ choices themselves (similarity 0.84)
• The native-informer dynamic lets writers simultaneously acknowledge and deny their Muslim origins (similarity 0.84)
• Academic definitions of Islamophobia must be coupled with lived testimony. (similarity 0.83)
• Islamic Orientalists turned alienation into superiority rather than self-understanding (similarity 0.83)
• Even failed portrayals of Muslim extremism expose the West’s own comforting fairytales (similarity 0.83)
• Formal choices like omniscience can both underpin and expose Islamophobic agendas (similarity 0.83)
• Crusade-era rhetoric called Muslims an accursed race utterly alienated from God. (similarity 0.83)