Formal choices like omniscience can both underpin and expose Islamophobic agendas

Related

• Literature resists Islamophobic universalism by structuring feeling and imagining alternative experiences (similarity 0.85)
• Interrogating Western-ness is required to expunge Islamophobia (similarity 0.84)
• Islamophobic claims serve to positively define their speakers rather than describe Muslims (similarity 0.83)
• Even anti-Islamophobic Muslim novels indirectly accept the frame they oppose. (similarity 0.83)
• Global fiction contests Islamophobia by refusing the clash-of-civilizations model (similarity 0.83)
• Academic definitions of Islamophobia must be coupled with lived testimony. (similarity 0.82)
• Arabist and Islamic studies resisted the revision that reformed other area studies (similarity 0.81)
• Formal devices can both advance and expose texts’ Islamophobic agendas (similarity 0.81)
• Individual Muslim writers are not trapped by the interpretive frame that dominates their reception (similarity 0.81)
• Islamic Orientalists turned alienation into superiority rather than self-understanding (similarity 0.81)
• European Islamophobia is more layered because it rests on living history of Islamic conquest. (similarity 0.80)
• Ideological scientificality overrides factual reality in totalitarian action (similarity 0.80)
• Every standpoint, including atheist ones, distorts scholarly choice and method. (similarity 0.80)
• The native-informer dynamic lets writers simultaneously acknowledge and deny their Muslim origins (similarity 0.80)
• History invents phantasms — fantasies attached to Muslim bodies — that remain powerful (similarity 0.79)