Medieval writers classified Muslim followers as monstrous races and devil minions.

Related

• Crusade-era rhetoric called Muslims an accursed race utterly alienated from God. (similarity 0.89)
• Individual Muslim writers are not trapped by the interpretive frame that dominates their reception (similarity 0.86)
• Even anti-Islamophobic Muslim novels indirectly accept the frame they oppose. (similarity 0.86)
• Islamophobic claims serve to positively define their speakers rather than describe Muslims (similarity 0.85)
• The native-informer dynamic lets writers simultaneously acknowledge and deny their Muslim origins (similarity 0.83)
• A Muslim character’s refusal to explain can be a political contestation, not mere rigidity (similarity 0.83)
• Chronicles of Riddick dresses its monsters in undisguised Muslim prayer and architecture (similarity 0.82)
• Medieval Christian identity defined itself as normative humanity with all else monstrous (similarity 0.82)
• History invents phantasms — fantasies attached to Muslim bodies — that remain powerful (similarity 0.82)
• Medieval polemicists used Muslim sources to validate anti-Muslim legends (similarity 0.82)
• Medieval thinkers strained to fit Muslims into a divinely ordained history (similarity 0.82)
• Even failed portrayals of Muslim extremism expose the West’s own comforting fairytales (similarity 0.82)
• A remarkably uniform anti-Saracen ideology persisted through centuries like a catechism (similarity 0.82)
• Medieval Muslim monsters were assembled from classical, biblical, and ethnic-other sources (similarity 0.82)
• Medieval cities depended on immigrant merchants, bankers, and artisans, not just laborers (similarity 0.82)