Academic definitions of Islamophobia must be coupled with lived testimony.
Related
- Islamophobic claims serve to positively define their speakers rather than describe Muslims (similarity 0.89)
- Scholarly definitions of Islamophobia cannot capture its lived, irrational experience (similarity 0.88)
- European Islamophobia is more layered because it rests on living history of Islamic conquest. (similarity 0.87)
- Islamophobia’s felt experience resists capture in academic definitions (similarity 0.86)
- Literature resists Islamophobic universalism by structuring feeling and imagining alternative experiences (similarity 0.85)
- Interrogating Western-ness is required to expunge Islamophobia (similarity 0.85)
- Islamophobia denotes fear, hatred, and hostility toward Muslims and Islam. (similarity 0.84)
- Islamophobia requires an acknowledged Muslim or Islamic element to be identified. (similarity 0.84)
- Islamophobia is an ideological construct with real consequences, not mere discourse (similarity 0.84)
- Fiction contests Islamophobia either by direct Islamic subjectivity or by oblique readerly defamiliarization. (similarity 0.84)
- The editor defines Islamophobia as largely unwarranted social anxiety, not mere prejudice (similarity 0.84)
- Indian Islamophobia constitutes a more immediate lethal threat to Muslims than the pandemic does (similarity 0.83)
- Even anti-Islamophobic Muslim novels indirectly accept the frame they oppose. (similarity 0.83)
- Poor evidence plus subjective definitions make Islamophobia easy to dismiss (similarity 0.83)
- Global fiction contests Islamophobia by refusing the clash-of-civilizations model (similarity 0.83)