Crusade-era rhetoric called Muslims an accursed race utterly alienated from God.

Related

• Medieval writers classified Muslim followers as monstrous races and devil minions. (similarity 0.89)
• Islamophobic claims serve to positively define their speakers rather than describe Muslims (similarity 0.84)
• Even anti-Islamophobic Muslim novels indirectly accept the frame they oppose. (similarity 0.83)
• Anti-Muslim crusades are political and cultural wars, not religious ones (similarity 0.82)
• A remarkably uniform anti-Saracen ideology persisted through centuries like a catechism (similarity 0.82)
• A Muslim character’s refusal to explain can be a political contestation, not mere rigidity (similarity 0.81)
• Individual Muslim writers are not trapped by the interpretive frame that dominates their reception (similarity 0.81)
• Medieval crusade rhetoric framed Muslims as objects of conversion or extermination (similarity 0.81)
• History invents phantasms — fantasies attached to Muslim bodies — that remain powerful (similarity 0.81)
• The native-informer dynamic lets writers simultaneously acknowledge and deny their Muslim origins (similarity 0.81)
• Crusade rhetoric racialized Muslims as a vile and accursed race. (similarity 0.80)
• Crusade ideology framed killing Muslims as a joyous religious duty (similarity 0.80)
• Even failed portrayals of Muslim extremism expose the West’s own comforting fairytales (similarity 0.80)
• Egyptian writers erased the Nubian-Sudanese distinction under one stereotype (similarity 0.80)
• Arabist and Islamic studies resisted the revision that reformed other area studies (similarity 0.80)