Donatella della Porta et al. — Mobilizing Against the Odds: Solidarity in Action in the Platform Economy
36 published claims from this book.
- A processual perspective links specific conditions to workers’ political recognition capacities.
- Algorithms have absorbed managers’ organizational functions in platform work
- Amazon driver mobilization is deliberately depoliticized
- Amazon drivers built workplace-only solidarity while couriers developed broader political identity frames.
- Amazon drivers mobilized a narrow identity frame demanding recognition as skilled logistics workers.
- Amazon drivers organize around narrow pragmatic goals, not political identity
- Amazon drivers’ specific skills both enabled union revival and pushed unions toward militant tactics.
- Amazon drivers’ unionization won recognition as logistics workers but stayed workplace-bound without broader politicization.
- Anchoring union ties shape whether platform worker mobilization develops narrow or universalizing identity frames.
- Couriers’ visible urban presence turns strikes into recognized, sympathy-winning events.
- Delivery algorithms capture workers’ tacit route knowledge and render them replaceable.
- Food couriers’ visibility makes them symbols for all precarious workers.
- Identity framing is a meso-level process of attributing meaning that organizational leaders shape
- Identity is constructed through boundary-making against the groups most similar to one’s own.
- Improvements among Amazon drivers stayed confined to subcontracted workers and did not scale.
- Italian food couriers build solidarity through informal collectives and a politicized class identity
- Italian food couriers organized through self-made informal unions, not established ones.
- Labor-organization specifics shape whether platform workers form narrow or broad solidarities.
- Mobilization strategies in platform struggles depend on sectoral labor-process differences
- Physical co-presence in shared urban spaces enables worker solidarity among food couriers.
- Platform couriers substitute brand shaming for workplace bargaining power.
- Platform labor fragmentation does not inherently preclude collective worker action.
- Platform labor fragmentation is a deliberate politics of isolating workers across five dimensions
- Platform narratives reframe wage work as hobbyist gigs while shifting all costs to workers.
- Platform work’s effect on solidarity depends on labour-organization specifics, not platform work itself
- Platform workers must struggle to be recognized as workers at all
- Platform workforce composition depends on local labor sector traditions, not platform design
- Platforms fragment workers through individualized scoring to discipline labor and lift productivity
- Protest frames broaden from local grievances toward systemic targets as movements grow.
- Sector differences shape whether platform workers adopt narrow or broad solidarity identities
- Sectoral union embeddedness, not platform work per se, shapes worker identity and mobilization
- Social movement frames are leadership-produced worldviews that give activists ideological context.
- Solidarity among workers is constructed through shared struggle rather than pre-existing.
- Solidarity arises in action as protests define distinct symbolic boundaries
- Workers can overcome fragmentation, but sector structure determines mobilization paths and identity frames.
- Workers resist algorithmic control by asserting mastery over their trade.