Anchoring union ties shape whether platform worker mobilization develops narrow or universalizing identity frames.

Evidence

While the mobilization of delivery drivers was supported by traditional trade unions—in particular: the FILT-CGIL—, the couriers’ mobilization was backed by a more informal coalition of actors from a left-wing social movement milieu—especially squatted social centers. The support of the FILT-CGIL led Amazon drivers to focus largely on improving their workplace and sectoral conditions, which resulted in a “sectoral” and “economistic” identity framing. Based upon the speciïŹc conditions they experienced as specialized logistics workers, this framing was comparatively focused and narrow. Meanwhile, the alliance with political activists pushed food delivery couriers to seek to involve subjects beyond their immediate professional context, including customers. They generated a rather broad frame of self-identiïŹcation that also addressed precarious platform workers in other sectors. As we have seen, they explicitly aimed at speaking not only for themselves, but on behalf of an entire new generation of precarious workers sharing the working conditions they experienced. The social context of squats and social centers facilitated the development of a politicized and universalizing identity framing among mobilized couriers. To put it succinctly: While Amazon drivers built upon a speciïŹc identity framing, couriers attempted to construct a universalizing one by appealing not only to all platform workers, but to all precarious workers as part of a common struggle. Thus, while Amazon drivers developed a more sectoral and workplace-based identity framing, food delivery couriers proposed a “hegemonic” and political one (Kelly 1988). — Donatella della Porta et al., Mobilizing Against the Odds, 119

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s interest in whether platform work re-aggregates workers into new solidarity, and shows this depends on pre-existing organizational anchoring rather than platform work’s inherent properties. — connects to: Identity framing is a meso-level process of attributing meaning that organizational leaders shape — Donatella della Porta et al., Mobilizing Against the Odds: Solidarity
, 33; Platform workers must struggle to be recognized as workers at all — Donatella della Porta et al., Mobilizing Against the Odds: Solidarity
, 38; Workers can overcome fragmentation, but sector structure determines mobilization paths and identity frames.
  • DEEPTHINKING: This synthesis shows organizational context—not the platform form itself—determines whether solidarity stays narrow or universalizes, a reversal of the assumption that platform work has uniform effects.