Status threat from diversity shifts whites rightward regardless of party affiliation.

Evidence

But party affiliation did not significantly moderate the effects of increasing diversity. When reminded of changing demographics, members of both parties who were highly identified with their racial group moved toward the right and toward Trump. — Brenda Major and Alison Blodorn and Gregory Major Blascovich, The threat of increasing diversity, 66

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly supports the reader’s threatened-privilege mobilization thesis: party identity does not buffer anticipatory status threat, pointing to a general mechanism that may replicate across identity axes and beyond race-specific accounts. — connects to: Racial status threat may drive conservative shifts even among minorities — Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson, On the Precipice of a…, 94; Perceived racial demographic shift raises White group status threat that drives Trump support. — Brenda Major and Alison Blodorn and Gregory Major Blascovich, The threat of increasing diversity: Why…, 5; Ethnic identification, not party affiliation, moderates Whites’ threat response. — Brenda Major and Alison Blodorn and Gregory Major Blascovich, The threat of increasing diversity: Why…, 21 (+9 more)
  • SEED: Angle for an essay: partisan identity fails as a firewall against status threat — the demographic threat cue overrides party, suggesting privileged-group mobilization cuts across partisan lines.

Broader Connections