Race has no scientific basis and is purely social convention

Evidence

The thing about race is that, scientifically, there is no such thing. As far back as 1950, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) released the conclusions of an international group of anthropologists, geneticists, sociologists, and psychologists that stated that the concept of race was not a scientific entity but a myth. Since then, one scientific group after another has issued similar conclusions. What we use to determine race is really nothing more than some haphazard physical characteristics, cultural histories, and social conventions that distinguish one group from another. But, for the sake of communication, we will continue to misuse the word, myself included, in order to discuss our social issues so everyone understands them. — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 98

Categorization

  • DEFINE: States the scientific consensus premise on which the entire racecraft-Islam-as-race argument rests.
  • XREF: The ‘race is a myth’ premise directly parallels the Fields sisters’ racecraft thesis - this is the book’s foundation Choudhury builds her legal argument on. — connects to: Race masks real socioeconomic relationships and has no analytic validity; Race is a political and social construct, not a scientific category; Race has no biological reality but is a potent social force (+12 more)
  • QUESTION: Key comparison with Aziz: does Aziz trace historical racialization while Choudhury grounds it in racecraft’s anti-biological definition?

Broader Connections