Punishing cheaters by withdrawing cooperation acts as third-party enforcement within the trading community.

Evidence

Consider the Adjusted Tit-for-Tat (ATFT) strategy according to which player i plays Honest at date 0 and then plays Cheat at date t + 1 if two conditions hold: (1) i made the play at date t that was specified by his equilibrium strategy and (2) M(h,, i ) did not make the play at date t that was specified by his equilibrium strategy. If either condition fails, then the ATFT strategy calls for i to play Honest. The ATFT strategy formalizes the idea that a trader who cheats will be punished by the next merchant he meets if that merchant is honest, e v h if that merchant is not the one who was cheated. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 52

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the formal microfoundation for Milgrom et al.’s private judges and the Godfather’s arbitration — punishment administered by non-victim third parties. — connects to: Cheating tempts traders while cooperation yields shared gains. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 42; Third-party trust guardians create new opportunities for exploitation. — Shapiro, Susan P., The Social Control of Impersonal Trust, 141; Community reputational enforcement works even without repeated bilateral interaction between traders. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 65 (+9 more)
  • DEFINE: Clean statement of the ATFT strategy and what it formalizes about community enforcement.

Broader Connections