Post-communist party success depended on internal organization, not nostalgia or economic decline

Evidence

Again the results indicate that the internal characteristics of the successor parties (coefficient = .72) contributed more to their political success in the decade following the collapse of communism than either the degree to which the standard of living declined (measured by declines in HDI and the misery index for 1992–1998) and the degree of nostalgia (both in terms of average nostalgia and changes in the level of nostalgia from 1992 to 1998). Further, average district magnitude also appeared to have little effect on the success of the former communist parties. Taken together, these results question both the nostalgia explanation for the success of the former communist parties and the extent to which institutional openings created political opportunities for the successor parties. These results suggests support for the internalist argument predicts, to a large extent, the degree of political success enjoyed by the successor party. — John T. Ishiyama, Party Organization and the Political…, 81

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly feeds the reader’s research question on organizational survival strategies of communist successor parties once the Cold War external-threat frame collapsed — party organization, not nostalgia, drove survival. — connects to: Communist organizational legacies paradoxically enabled successor parties’ democratic survival; Post-1989 communist successors varied from full regeneration to protest parties — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 110; Polish successor party victories did not rest on a traditional left working-class electorate — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 1148 (+16 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Relates to the reader’s broader interest in how groups sustain cohesion when an external enemy/threat frame dissolves; here organizational infrastructure substituted for the vanished threat.

Broader Connections