Communist parties survived only where leaders grasped that 1989 changed the system itself

Evidence

The Polish and Hungarian parties had few illusions regarding the relevance of party membership as a source of support or the extent of change necessary. Democracy meant electoral competition, not internal discussion. Having already been challenged by society, these parties’ leaders understood that they were faced with considerable competition as political actors, and that under the new conditions after 1989, this competition was now given free rein. In short, they saw that 1989 was not a change within the system but of it. Although the parties gave up power reluctantly, they understood that the political changes meant they would have to compete with other political actors and abandon any appeals to continuing the past regime or its practices. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 348

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallel to the communist-successor-party literature the reader is comparing; the Polish/Hungarian ‘change of the system, not in it’ framing maps onto which successor parties found new purposes vs decayed after 1989. — connects to: Forced exit from power in 1989 was needed to compel communist party reform — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 112; Post-1989 communist successors varied from full regeneration to protest parties — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 110; Successor party resurgence combined post-1989 conditions, communist legacies, and crafted appeals — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 1197 (+3 more)

Broader Connections