Distinct organizational practices shaped how successor parties survived

Evidence

To examine the effects of organizational practices, this chapter compares both how different parties responded to similar exogenous shocks and how similar parties can differ in outcomes. First, the Polish and Hungarian parties followed distinct policies of societal engagement and elite advancement: The Hungarian party entered into a “social contract” after 1956 that minimized public conflict, promoted extensive economic and political reforms, and coopted the intelligentsia into the party. Meanwhile, the Polish party faced greater and more continual public conflict, was more cautious in liberalizing the economy and the polity, and fostered competition and pluralism within its own ranks instead of coopting the intelligentsia. Yet both parties had to respond to lengthy negotiations that eventually forced them to exit from power. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 152

Categorization

  • XREF: Cross-case design (same exogenous shock, different survival paths) is precisely the comparative structure the reader seeks for post-1989 communist successor parties. — connects to: Pre-democratic organizational practices shaped successor parties’ post-regime survival capacities — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 88; Communist organizational legacies paradoxically enabled successor parties’ democratic survival; Party survival in competitive postcommunist politics requires organizational adaptation, not weak rivals. — John T. Ishiyama, Party Organization and the Political…, 97 (+6 more)

Broader Connections