Muslim citizenship in America is negated by religious identity after crises

Evidence

Although Muslim Americans are bona fide citizens, their religious identity induces scrutiny of their citizenship status, patriotism, and belonging. This scrutiny is strongest after national crises, and specifically in the direct aftermath of a terror attack committed by a Muslim culprit. As constitutional law scholar Kenneth Karst writes, “In times of trouble … fears tend to focus on particular groups of cultural outsiders as a source of danger.” This is particularly true for Muslim Americans, whose religious affiliation can negate any legal or material claim to Americanness and hold them out to be threatening interlopers. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 340

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly extends Selod’s surveillance work on citizenship and Rana’s apparatus framing — the legal citizenship status fails to shield Muslims from scrutiny. — connects to: Muslim lives are less grievable than American ones in public memory; Muslim Americans appeared only as hypothetical threat in 1789, not as real persons; Religious minorities become politically suspect when religion ties to national identity (+27 more)
  • QUESTION: Karst’s ‘cultural outsiders’ frame generalizes beyond Muslims — worth chasing whether the same logic applied to Japanese Americans pre-WWII and what difference legal race cases made.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 340

Broader Connections