Muslim Americans hold nominal but reduced substantive citizenship

Evidence

“[Muslim Americans] may now enjoy nominal citizenship status, but their members are, in fact, afforded less in the way of substantive citizenship than others in society” (30). — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 1344

Linda Bosniak, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (Princeton University Press, 2008), 30–31. “[Muslim Americans] may now enjoy nominal citizenship status, but their members are, in fact, afforded less in the way of substantive citizenship than others in society” (30). — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 1344

Categorization

  • SEED: Could anchor an essay contrasting formal legal citizenship with de facto second-class membership for minority groups.
  • DEFINE: The nominal-versus-substantive citizenship distinction names the core mechanism Beydoun uses to frame Muslim citizen status across national cases.
  • XREF: Echoes the Frankfurt School material on legal forms protecting nominal liberal rights but not real social power. — connects to: Islamophobia hits hardest those with the weakest legal hold on America; Muslim lives are less grievable than American ones in public memory; American tolerance of Muslims conditioned on their political quiescence and departure. (+31 more)
  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 1344

Broader Connections