Mixed warmth-and-competence stereotypes ideologically justify existing social hierarchies.

Evidence

Nevertheless, our view is more general, at once applying to many more social groups and going beyond analyses of specific roles. We also emphasize the functional compatibility of combinations that mix perceived competence and warmth, whereby the high–low combination justifies resentment, the low–high combination justifies subordination, and both maintain the status quo. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 51

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Compact statement of how stereotype structure itself does ideological work: the envy combination (high competence, low warmth) licenses resentment, the paternalistic one licenses subordination.
  • XREF: Bridges directly to the reader’s target: why envied high-competence outgroups get scapegoated precisely through the ‘justifies resentment’ function. — connects to: Stereotypes justify existing social arrangements and preserve the status quo — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 1415; Stereotypes legitimize existing social hierarchy even against people’s own interests — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 43; Out-group stereotypes split into stable competence-warmth clusters with half the groups showing mixed profiles — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 155 (+10 more)

Broader Connections