Enviable outgroups historically split from pitied ones along warmth and competence.

Evidence

In the intergroup domain, early on, one ethnic out-group (i.e., Jews) was viewed as competent but not warm, and another (i.e., “Negroes”) was viewed as warm but not competent (Allport, 1954; Bettelheim & Janowitz, 1950). Curiously, this older ethnic-group distinction echoes modern-day views about perceived subgroups of women (Deaux, Winton, Crowley, & Lewis, 1985; Eckes, 1994; Noseworthy & Lott, 1984; Six & Eckes, 1991): disliked, dominant, competent, nontraditional women (e.g., career women, feminists, lesbians, athletes) versus likable, dependent, incompetent, traditional women (e.g., housewives, sometimes “chicks”). Overall, the ethnic and gender distinctions both fit our hypothesized dimensions of competence and warmth. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 19

Categorization

• XREF: Directly feeds the reading purpose — the high-competence/low-warmth ‘enviable’ outgroup category maps onto the Jews/career-women examples the reader is after. — connects to: Groups seen as competing with the ingroup are stereotyped as low in warmth — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 1491; Envied out-groups draw low-warmth stereotypes that rationalize their exclusion — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 32; Mixed stereotypes combine high competence with low warmth or vice versa — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 3 (+10 more)

Broader Connections

• Groups are judged on perceived warmth and competence, which drive distinct emotions toward them #corroborates (0.88) — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 2272
• Out-group stereotypes split into stable competence-warmth clusters with half the groups showing mixed profiles #corroborates (0.86) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 155
• Envied out-groups draw low-warmth stereotypes that rationalize their exclusion #expands (0.85) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 32
• High-competence low-warmth outgroups share a stereotype of being too competent #exemplifies (0.83) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 30
• Groups seen as competing with the ingroup are stereotyped as low in warmth #expands (0.82) — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 1491
• Paternalized low-competence groups cluster high on warmth. #exemplifies (0.82) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 190
• High-competence groups are judged significantly lower in warmth, yielding mixed stereotypes. #expands (0.80) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 120
• Outgroup prejudice reduces to two basic judgments, warmth and competence #expands (0.80) — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 322
• Perceived warmth and competence of groups derive from their social structure and interdependence. #expands (0.79) — Susan T. Fiske, Stereotype Content, 18
• Mixed stereotypes combine high competence with low warmth or vice versa #qualifies (0.78) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 3
• Outgroups are universally mapped on warmth and competence dimensions #expands (0.77)
• Warm stereotypes of subordinate groups function to keep them placated and deferential #qualifies (0.74) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 44